MovieChat Forums > freefallin > Replies
freefallin's Replies
He didn't actually catch the bullet with his teeth if that's what you meant. You can see him moving the bullet out of his mouth. I agree with the other stuff. The T-X is about to shoot Brewster but pauses when Arnold pulls up in the car. Why? Why not just shoot the car? John opens the coffin and sits up when the cops are still firing at the car. Why would you do that? Nevermind how the coffin is bulletproof in the first place and why Sarah decided to make it that way.
This wasn't a smart movie where characters try to behave intelligently or logically as they can which makes it hard to suspend disbelief or really like the movie. It was just another mindless summer popcorn flick.
It turned out pretty well since they didn't get caught. A cave? Where the hell do you find a cave? You might as well say put the bodies in my secret bunker that nobody knows about.
That's why you dissolve in acid!
I just finished watching the trilogy and it was quite a chore. They weren't bad but they didn't need to be so damn long. I don't think I can rewatch it again even though this fan edit is "only" 4 hours long.
Right but I mean the scene where Walt is trying to figure out the best way to kill Crazy 8. It shows him grabbing a knife, a hammer, a gun, then he decides on the plastic bag. But he'd have to physically hold the bag over his head and suffocate him. He could have just put some phosphine in a bucket and put it under Crazy 8's face and left the basement and come back later when he's dead.
With what? They didn't have shovels.
Well at that point Walt was still a very squeamish person. He wouldn't want to touch Crazy Eight if he could help it. With the phosphine he could dump some in a bucket and put it under his face and he'd be toast.
A billionaire could hire his own private force to do it and not involve outsiders. This movie was all kinds of stupid. Such a bad film. Hard to believe Snyder went from Dawn of the Dead which I liked a lot to this trash.
You must be a lucky individual, traveling all over the world looking at gorilla suits.
We already knew this in Civil War. He and his father supported the Accords but then his father was killed and he wanted to go after Barnes by himself to kill him. I wish they had brought that up in this movie and in Civil War. Like "hey, you say you're in favor of the Accords but yet you acted without approval because of vengeance. So it's ok to act unilaterally when you feel it's personal?"
My explanation is the suit opens from the back and he left it open so he could get in and out quickly. Plot hole averted lol.
The only one who's saying he's gay is you. Maybe you got some special gaydar.
I hope they do make a famous MK character officially gay so we can really see you b|tch and moan. That would be funny.
GG
<blockquote>He literally says the man exploited orphans like him, and clenched his fist -- it was pretty obvious he was referencing his childhood based on how emotional he became when mentioning the man preyed on orphans.</blockquote>
Or maybe he just really hated people who prey on children? Regardless, even if he was abused as an orphan that doesn't automatically make him gay.
<blockquote>Another Left-wing nut who has zero respect for the source material.</blockquote>
What source material? The original video games that don't mention Kang's sexuality at all or the later games where the characters have all sorts of different endings including getting killed off? Or the '90s films where they were making shit up also? I don't care if Kang is straight or gay but you're basing this on zero proof except he "seems gay".
<blockquote>Typical. Do they breed you bunch in a tube someplace?</blockquote>
Yea away from hateful trash like you.
I think you're an idiot or a troll but there was nothing to indicate that Liu Kang was gay, not that there's anything wrong with that. He was never a child prostitute. He said he was a stray found by Bo Rai Cho, taken to the Wu Shi academy. After he graduated he was given the name of a man who exploited children and Kang killed him. Where did you get child prostitute and "his pimp" from?
He sees Lao as a brother so when he says they were supposed to die together I understood it as die together fighting in Mortal Kombat.
He's sticking needles into Cole's wounds of course he's going to be gentle about it.
You're so focused on seeing gay things that you can't even understand the movie correctly.
There's riots and then there's treason. You can decide which is worse.
Well this comment didn't age well considering what happened Jan. 6.
I don't get why he put out his cigarette. Is it illegal to smoke in your own car?
"... Haley Joel Osment? Was about to reveal his wives fate. What did I miss?"
Osment's character Mesmer can only read minds and memories. He couldn't tell Butcher anything he doesn't already know. Butcher just wanted Mesmer to read his mind so he would know Butcher was about to kill him.
"I was so confused by that scene and how it was just glossed over. Up to that point Butcher could be seen as an ani-hero who skirted the lines of villainy but that act alone was just as evil as anything Homelander has ever done, making Butcher not the slightest bit better. And the audience is supposed to root for that POS?"
It wasn't glossed over. Mesmer betrayed them all to Homelander putting all their lives and their families' lives in danger. Obviously Butcher was gonna kill Mesmer for that. What else would he do?
Pretty sure Homelander is wearing a muscle suit and nobody seems to care about that.