MovieChat Forums > Moderator4
Moderator4 (577)
Posts
Replies
This is true.
Censorship and some new underhand tactics are still being used on X, like removing followers, disabling notifications for some accounts even when it shows they are switched on and shadow-banning is still rife.
What is the point of handing someone a microphone in a crowded hall but not switching it on so only the people in the front row can hear you? That's not free speech: it's just more weasel words for censorship.
Also, your first hire as owner shouldn't be a pro censorship CEO with ties to the pro-censorship WEF.
Also, unlike X, we will give you an explanation as to why something was removed or someone was temp/banned.
I think you misunderstood. 'I' don't claim they are the same person. The media claimed someone with the same name, around the same age, living in the Windsor area and with a Portuguese connection took the image. I point out that a person answering that description on LinkedIn says it was not him while the image the media presents 'appears' to be AI generated.
Many years ago, I was once accused by someone of something which was not true after reporting to my bosses finding some creepy documents he had written about me and my daily routines etc on my (shared) work computer. He claimed I wrote them. I eventually managed to prove he was a liar with dogged determination and a program called xtree gold and that I could not have possibly have done what he accused me of because 1. I was never in the building during the times when the documents were saved and had witnesses to say I was always in the cafe for lunch and 2., the printer listed as being used to print off the docs did not exist in the building but was tied to his work documents as being his home printer. That set me off on a lifelong journey to prove what is true and to not believe what someone claims and what others at the time are willing to believe. I've become a lifelong sceptic of many claims but also love to theorise on what may or may not be. I like to investigate stuff. It's not weird or sad. It's healthy to be sceptical rather than blindly believing everything you are told. Especially so when you are being lied to (or about). What's sad is people who continue to believe the people who keep lying to you and every time they say 'trust me bro' you believe that too.
If the real creator of the vid wanted to remain anon then they could have said so. They would have been paid either way.
Which link doesn't work for you?
And you didn't answer my question about if she doesn't appear in public at Easter, will you start to have doubts about her wellbeing too?
Apparently even TMZ are now having some doubts about the authenticity of the Kate and maybe William too in the video - https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OuSgiq3nVmc?feature=share
Did I say I believed him or did I present EVIDENCE that their claim was not true?
Again, you seem to mistake what I believe with what I can prove with alternate THEORIES that I present. That he lives next to Windsor and speaks or is Portuguese is maybe a coincidence or more evidence of a fake story.
Here I will present EVIDENCE that their claim about the 'person' Nelson Silva (pictured here https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DD-kate-splash_COMBO.jpg?strip=all&quality=100&w=1080&h=1080&crop=1 ) may not be real via a website which claims it can detect AI generated photos and says there is a 97.52% chance that the image is AI generated. https://isitai.com/ai-image-detector/
Would I trust The Sun to tell the truth? Hahahahahahaha.
Ever asked yourself why a perfectly normal family photo would even need to be photoshopped in the places that it was?
Piers Morgan always supports the Royals so for him to now say let's back up and say this is not normal or right says something.
Why would it be fair when they lied already and have now put off the Easter date?
Also, did TMZ & The Sun get conned with that video as the person they claimed took it & paid a few thousand for says he didn't take it?
By the way, the man who TMZ & the MSM claimed took the footage has publicly stated on LinkedIn that he did not - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nelson-silva-7003391a7_weirdest-disclaimer-ive-ever-had-to-make-activity-7175884982836436992-B4Tf?trk=public_profile
Where did I say that she is dead or dying here? I'm just asking questions over obviously questionable actions with unsatisfactory answers and I'm not the only one and if even Piers Morgan is asking questions and saying it's a bad look for the royals that they are doing more harm than good and that William and Kate need to directly address the issue then you know something is a bit off more than they are saying (and what does he know, given his contacts, that he isn't saying?).
If she still doesn't appear when 'they said' she would, will you still think there's nothing wrong?
Sigh. Do you know the difference between evidence and proof? Surprisingly many people cannot differentiate between the two but they mean entirely different things.
You have been presented with evidence, not proof.
They claimed it was a photograph. It was not. They then claimed Kate edited it - no proof of that other than a text saying so which could have been written by anybody which means it is evidence.
There's also evidence that they were all wearing the same clothing as an event they attended in November only different colours (https://www.tiktok.com/@allynaston/video/7344921409816251678)
They also refuse to release the original image which is suss in itself. After all, what is there to hide if was a genuine photo she edited?
They claim she is still too ill and recovering and then show she is outside almost skipping along looking all fit & healthy after abdominal surgery, (which I know first-hand is not possible). So which is it? Too ill or not too ill? Not too ill to make a statement?
If I show you the back of someone's head and say it is me, is it me? You have no way to know so that image is up for discussion as evidence and not proof. If you look at the the brickwork inside and outside the car it does not match so again, that is suss and looks edited.
British taxpayers deserve to know if she is ok because after all, they pay for their upkeep and people at large around the world are concerned as to whether she is ok or not, which is reasonable.
Nobody is asking for her personal medical details but she could end all speculation easily with a short vid addressing people's concerns saying yes I am ok so no need to worry or make memes and jokes and speculation which is becoming highly damaging to TRF anymore. And yes people heal at different rates but abdominal surgeries are notoriously painful.
They've also changed the date of when she will appear in public so it's not going to be Easter now. Hmmm.
She may be ok but what if she isn't?
I prefer to deal with facts.
The fact is that they portrayed a photoshopped image as a genuine thing, then put out a TEXT claiming to be from Kate saying it was her, then showed another doctored image of the back of someone's head and claimed that's also Kate and a genuine image. Then showed a video which is clearly not taken at the time they claimed, of someone they claim to be Kate sauntering away without a care in the world whilst also claiming she is recovering from abdominal surgery (and I had an abdominal surgery myself some years ago and I can tell you I was NOT able to walk for months without being in great pain) and also looks nothing like her when zoomed in.
What they haven't done is to produce Kate herself, in person, saying she is fine. Until then, I will continue to poke holes in their stories instead of believing proven liars.
True. I like to roll it up in a ball and throw it at the heads of people who believe that a photo of the back of someone's head in a car automatically makes it Kate Middleton and not an image of the back of someone's head provided by the people that just lied to you about the last picture that was faked.
View all replies >