MovieChat Forums > mark > Replies
mark's Replies
True. Should be avoided if you dont want your discussion sidetracked ...
You have to get the right ones. many are pointlessly small, and far too thick . its a pet hate of mine. I was going to start webpage to shame the worst offenders. "World of baps"
Warburton's "Large barms " in the green packets are the best - you can get a good load of bacon, egg , cheese & mushrooms into those!
lost bread?
trump was only 1 of the 5 examples i gave of "bad things" , and the list wasnt even the point ,
The point was "how can you be angry at bland , mellow , ambient music - when there worse things to direct your anger at"
Also i was trying to be funny and steal this guy's material:
https://youtu.be/a7TzJezL07s?t=53
coincidentally i just made a post about about his "smartness" , which did admit that for some definitiions of smart he fit them.
https://moviechat.org/nm1477533/Ivanka-Trump/591d3c6f01b3f100116e3c79/as-bad-as-Trump
'bad' was then translated into 'smart'
so its Mr Trumps smartness thats in debate.
The Problem is terms like smartness / cleverness / intelligence are all highly debateable as to how they are measured.
A guy whose got himself elected President has to be smart in some ways,
but in every normal measurement , i bet he falls flat.
If he had any kind of evidence of cerebral aptitude you can bet he'd be bragging about it (well , proving it i mean , i assume he's bragging about it regardless)
Instead he's lying about ever having read a book and refusing to reveal his high school results.
You hate Vangelis? how can you hate vangelis? theres so many other more worthy things to hate!
You got the Orange Idiot in your white house ...
The Iranian nutjob threatening the world
Simon cowell churning out shite..
The kardashians making the world a dumber place..
Covidiots spreading a killer virus around
Hating Vangelis is like being angry with a waterfall
That music is , like , silence colored in
why, is your immune system completed?
same here
need to rewatch that
i certainly do not!
I was quoting the idiot-in-chief
The explanation is in the post below the quote genius
"released in the UK on 20 May, 1980"
Well , if i'm ever going to watch any of them again , it'll probly be this one , and I'd better do it tomorrow!
You dont wanna throw Rogue One in as 3.5? that was pretty good :)
<i>Sorry, but your logic doesn't work. So in your eyes, the ideal Star Wars is Episodes 4 thru 6? In that case, shouldn't they really be named 1 thru 3? You see my issue, now?</i>
no i do not. Thats the most pointless and confusing comment ever to muddy any water.
We're talking about wether the prequels and sequals were worth having and you are proposing a new naming system. now , in any further comments when someone says "ep1" no one will know if they mean 1 or 4 .
<i>Wouldn't the lack of ANY 1-3 bother you? </i>
NO! it wasnt even called ep 4,5,6 until Lucas pulled the idea for 3 prequels out of his ass some years later!
You could say that about any film! You know John wick 1 , 2 and 3? well actually we've got an idea for a prequel so we've renamed them 2,3 and 4 - that dosent mean you have to watch / like / buy or entertain in any other way the new (1)
yeah , i watched "Flu" recently , good Korean thriller
ah.
Well , its a fort , waddya expect?
also the outer wall of that thing isnt a significant part of the movie
nah , those local high street shops need to be stamped out like the dinosaurs they are.
they are now an unnecessary step in the chain , that we shouldnt waste time , and resources polluting the earth to visit.
here's him saying it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulTxGwNxo74
I dont "kind of get what he’s saying" even after watching him say it .
what thing they were "all on" , the atol? , the tanker ?, that lovely trimaran?
why does flammable and inflammable mean the same thing?