MovieChat Forums > WildStyle26
WildStyle26 (24)
Posts
Replies
Agreed. We hear so many complaints about how "SJW's" are whiners & overly sensitive. But that just seems like dogma for people who don't want to see minorities featured anywhere. Otherwise it's pushing an agenda just because they exist. lol
I liked it too. Possibly more than the first. The first was great, but sequels sometimes do tend to up the action more, and be more over the top, which great if done right.
I was worried when I saw reviews talking about how there's more cut backs to the real world than the first. I HATED that twist at the end because it took me out of the story and ruined the effect of the characters when it's just a kid playing with Lego's rather than staying legit Lego world. I rarely even watch too much of the movie once that part comes up. However, in this movie, it was handled better. There was something less obnoxious about it. I guess because it was done in & out during the final climax of the first film.
I had mixed feelings on Rex. I checked out spoilers before the film, so I knew the twist going in. But I still liked him & hated to see him go.
If I gave ratings, this one would get an 8/10.Again, I still could've done without the real-world juxtaposition. But it was handled better, so the score is better than the first. Would've given it a 9 if not for that though.
Well this has come up enough times. So I just meshed all my answers together into 1 long post. I'll copy and paste. Anyone is welcome to read if they care enough. lol
They were broken up. Rachel said so 3 different times. She tells Monica that they didn't get to dinner, because they broke up instead. Then she leaves a message on Ross' machine, saying she doesn't wanna get back together that way. You don't get back to something you never left. Finally, she asks to be his girlfriend again when he opens the door. So there's no question. They had broken up. Ross did not cheat on her.
Now, regarding his sleeping with Chloe. He was not right to do that. But he wasn't wrong either. He was emotional and upset. His girlfriend had just called it quits on their relationship, then when he calls to talk to her, he finds she's got Mark in her apartment after 10:00 p,m. Then she was caught lying about it. Ross asked her was anyone there, and she said no. Then he asks if it was Mark, and she reluctantly says yes, prompting Ross to hang up. Why did Rachel lie about having Mark over? Because she knew it would upset Ross. But why is she so intent to hang out personably with a man her boyfriend clearly didn't feel comfortable about? Even in the midst of a break-up, she can't stay away from Mark. Rachel lied about Mark for the same reason Ross tried to keep her from finding out about Chloe. Both knew the other would be upset at their actions.
Ross was rebounding when he slept with Chloe. He did love Rachel, but after she calls a break and has Mark in her apartment alone at night, he thought he'd lost her, and that she'd made her choice. He didn't go out looking for women to sleep with. He went out to have a drink, and Chloe came on to him very aggressively. Being slightly drunk and upset, he gave in to temptation, and trying to console himself with another person.
Rachel did the exact same thing. When Ross came home with Julie, Rachel was devastated and went to Palo's place and slept with him. Does that mean she didn't want Ross? No. it means she thought she'd missed her chance with Ross, and now he's chosen another woman. So she was hurt and upset. Even the following morning, she was upset over Ross and what she did that last night. But even though she'd just had sex with another man that night, she still had feelings for Ross and wanted him. Palo was a mere distraction and stress-release. No different than Chloe. So yes, Ross had sex with another woman. but that didn't mean he loved said woman. It was an emotional thing he did in distress over losing Rachel.
And Rachel doesn't give Ross enough credit. Does she really think so little of him that she thinks he went out to look for women to shag after the break? She should have understood he was upset and emotional -just like she was when he was with Julie. Rachel had nothing to be upset over. Ross just had random ONS with a rebound girl he cared nothing about. Is she honestly threatened by that when she's been dating him for an entire year and he loved her dearly? She acts as though he just casually slept around on her. Or like she just found out that he was cheating on her, and almost left her for Carol or something.
But when Rachel finds out about Chloe, she changes her tune. Then she turns everything on Ross. All her mistakes didn't matter when she found out what he did. He explains his feelings about why a break = break-up, and she had no answer. All she could do was say he was using technicalities. Then he again points out how he didn't want the break, and that she ran from things as soon as they got rough. Once again, she has no decent response and just brushes it off with "that's neither here nor there." That was very here and there. She broke up with him, and had hurt him. Then she further screwed up by having Mark over at 10:00, then lying about it.
She accuses Ross of jeopardizing their relationship by sleeping with Chloe. But she jeopardized their relationship by breaking up with him in the first place, and still keeping personal contact with Mark. When she called the break, Ross wanted to calm down and suggested they get yogurt. But Rachel corrects him and says she meant a break from their entire relationship. He stands there and stares at her for a min, and she stares right back, and says nothing -which told him all he needed to know. So, he left.
BOTH were at fault. But Rachel refuses to admit that she wasn't a perfect girlfriend. She made bad choices as well. And even during their fight, it was all about how hurt she was. She never once stopped to think about how hurt Ross is. He grovelled and begged all throughout that episode as if he was the only one who made bad choices, and victimized Rachel.
And I don't think Ross lied about still wanting to be with Rachel if she'd slept with Mark. Because it was the same with Carol. She cheated on him, and chose Susan. But when Carol was pregnant, he still clearly had feelings for her, and even aske
Some stuff you just don't notice.
Like Monica's apartment. We all remember it as purple. But when the show first started, her apartment was blue.
Jennifer's hair was the same. And really, it was worse than Courteney's.
Jen and Courteney seemed to have more wavy hair, but decided to make it bone straight. Courteney's fluctuated a bit more. Sometimes it was thick-looking and nice. Sometimes, it was thin and unimpressive. And sometimes it looked thicker, but had some scraggle to it.
Straight hair will just look more thin than wavy, curly, or bushy, hair.Fran Drescher on the Nanny. Wren she had her hair curly, it was known to look big, but when she wore it straight, it didn't stand out as too bad.
Now Jennifer and Courteney both seemed to have thicker hair in season 7. And it looked much better than it did in seasons 5 & 6.
Here's Courteney in season 7
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/wcw26/80220759/40818/40818_original.png
Her hair looks pretty thick. But she's also got it more wavy, rather than completely bone straight.
Then here's Jennifer -same season.
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/wcw26/80220759/41160/41160_original.png
Her's is looking a bit thicker too.
But Jennifer for the most part, NEVER had the beautiful hair she had in season 1 + 2 again.
Well some just like anything relating to babies. So they could be excited about the baby, not necessarily Phoebe.
But the entire episode was cringe lol
I think North West is worse. lol
Or better yet, the fact Rachel wanted to name their baby James, if it was a girl. Some insist it's unisex, but like Joey's purse, I am not getting that. lol
This post was deleted because it didn't say the F word.
This post was deleted because it wore Monica's underwear to work
This post was deleted because it was TO That Could Have Been
This post was deleted because it gave the worst massages in the world.
View all replies >