MovieChat Forums > TM1617-2 > Replies
TM1617-2's Replies
Erik Destler is my favorite alternative slasher. He's not the same kind that Voorhees and Myers are, but his work follows the same pattern and idea. How convenient for Freddy Krueger to play The Phantom Of The Opera!
It's fun that you always dress as Jason Voorhees, ShogunofYonkers. He's my favorite slasher.
Thank you mav100000! Happy Halloween!
Thank you popactor! Happy Halloween!
Last year I walked past someone dressed as Ghostface from [i]Scream[/i]. I assumed that the child was a boy, but it was just an inclination of mine to think that a girl was less likely to wear the costume.
Okay. At least you fit in with Halloween!
MecuryMars, Michael is always briefly stopped by physical invasions, so he must experience pain. However, since he is immortal, his body recovers rapidly from getting hurt. The masked killer probably feels the extreme heat for a moment the way that we would if we were to get moderate burns, but continues to drown the woman because his injury disappears immediately. Also, the water is not scalding the instant that the murder begins. That makes it easier for Michael to keep his grip.
Is this a joke about yourself, aliensalmon, or are you referring to a real costume?
TaRaNRoD, regardless of where your perspective lies, you do not have the right to apply names to or produce ludicrous tales about me. Wanting to be inside my brain while scoffing at its functioning is a very queer contradiction. If a subject does not accommodate your interest or understanding, then you are not required to discuss it. Your post is highly redundant, has no substantial root, and is almost identical to an earlier message on this thread. All three say a great deal about your social level.
I have continued only because my response to your question for me has not originally seemed thorough for you. There is a portion that I have called an alternative possibility, which is the admission that it probably does not happen in the film. However, all of my other points are illustrated though things that I have already referenced, such as the newspapers, the television report, and Doc's words plus what others say about him. You have agreed that there is nothing wrong with hypothesizing as long as you clarify it. I can attest to doing so, and have complimented two of your ideas. Deriding me is unwarranted, and the lengthening of our conversation is fruitless.
That is quite a narrow observation. All questions asked for legitimate reasons should be considered valid on a discussion board.
You have twice made disparaging remarks about my intelligence, strntz, yet cannot be troubled to explain [i]your[/i] post. If you think that my topic is senseless, then why are you responding to it? My presence on this forum is your assurance that I am literate, so you need not repeat your sentences.
Oh, yes, it would be an excellent matter to explore, especially through comparison. It's another topic, though.
Oh, thank you. I have never seen it until your usage and know very little about cars.
Yes, but what does MK stand for?
Please do not mind the deleted post above. I've realized that this is probably a better place for my extension. If a method for tracking plutonium were available, then surely Emmett Brown would be cognizant of it, which is a mismatch to his confidence that he is free of the Libyans. The way that this thread has carried out proves that my questions are topics that have been ignored in sketchy storytelling and cannot be settled. That aspect is the culprit for a complicated discussion. By the way, what does MK2 stand for?
I appreciate your attempting to follow me, wearsalan. Perhaps one of my suggestions needs more details. I don't believe that this one is what happens, but wish to explain it for the sake of completion. Suppose that Doc were the one to take certain contents from the vault. He would do so after being asked by the foreigners to build a nuclear weapon because they know that he can get the required element. That is a saver of time and money for the group members even though they are capable of breaking into the facility. From the perspective of the criminals, the scientist would be stealing from them since they are counting on the plutonium for the bomb to function and thus viewing it as their property. The movie seems to blame the physical removal of the radioactive substance from the building on the Libyans. Assuming that this is the manner of the theft, Dr. Brown uses what his time machine lacks after being entrusted with it. He implies that he tries to lessen the burden on his conscience through the by-product of preventing a piece of warfare. The inventor is also murdered for making dolts of the Eastern nationalists by pretending that he is willing to create a bomb, not just for his larceny. I know that the terrorists are not caught, which is one of my chief points.
They instead confess, and never would consider such a thing without hefty compensation. The only person in play who can provide the reward is Doc, so there has to be a connection between him and the laboratory. Your hypothesis about the news report is savvy, but cannot be applicable because The Pacific Nuclear Research Facility would increase their security after the burglary and require government assistance to do so if they have a national contract. I'm afraid that I have run out of textual room, so please continue to my next post.
Thank you, LivingMCM.
Buttercup does not have a greater social class than Westley, but he is employed by her family. She is infatuated with him and suspects that he shares her feelings, so she pushes her limits with him.