Makes you wonder what exactly she took away. Probably incriminating evidence.
https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/06/michael-jackson-death-moving-vans-arrive-at-singers-holmby-hills-mansion.html
Because if there's anyone with a keen knowledge of forensic procedures, it's Janet Jackson.
shareShe wouldn't have to be an expert on forensics to understand that big brother's 'home movies' of his sleepovers and his kid porn collection would not be something that authorities should find and should really be taken away.
shareHow does the article support any of that speculation? There's no evidence that Janet possessed any knowledge of her late brother's activities, let alone the precise locations of any incriminating evidence. Also, if one were to enter the domicile of the recently deceased to remove items that one would rather not be made public, why do it in broad daylight with enormous moving trucks? Nothing in the article you linked supports this notion. It just mentions the presence of moving vehicles (while police were present on site) and shifts focus to the legions of fans mourning his death.
shareIt is so obvious Janet was frantically scraping off the interior of the house because of the very real possibility there would be incriminating evidence left behind, such as pornography, erotica, mock marriage props etc.
shareOh, so Michael must have trucked that stuff out himself during the previous 2 investigations since nothing was ever found. I guess it was a good thing Janet was there to help him out this time since he obviously couldn't do it himself.
share😂
share