Only in white America


Only in America can you be exonerated 14x times over and a court of law.

Have your home raided like you are Osama bin Laden and the authorities find nothing

Have the FBI investigate you for over 10 years along with child protective services in which they found nothing, having factual proof of your innocence

Yet the words of discredited, money chasing accusers are automatically believed then pushed by mainstream media and other powerful figures in Hollyweird where the real child molesters have been protected.

What we are witnessing is the premeditated attempted destruction of a dead black man's iconic legacy

You are guilty no matter the lack of evidence against you or what the outcome is in a court of law

We are still living in very dangerous times in America

reply

Only in Black America can a black entertainer who hated his own race so much that he had surgery and skin bleaching to look white and who hired white people to produce his made-to-order children because he didn't want to use his own black genes, and who slept with a string of little white boys, be looked up to as a hero and martyr of his people.

reply

Typical deflective bs

reply

Those are valid points. Why don't you respond to them?

reply

Because the left doesn't like facts, so they choose to ignore them. Besides, based on the title, the loser is just trolling.

reply

If you can explain how that nonsense in any way correlates with the discredited abuse allegations & the media's collusion highlighted in the OP.

reply

Prove his kids are ACTUALLY his they aren't. Why lie and just not say he adopted them?

reply

Well the skin bleaching was because of his skin condition already losing melanin or something so he got patches of white skin among the black so I think anyone would've just bleached it or maybe he could blacked it up instead but eh I dunno.

I heard they're removing MJ and R Kelly songs from places now given these allegations coming to light. Wonder why people can't differentiate between performer and the person themselves. These people made nice songs so one can still enjoy it while not feeling raped or whatever triggers their imaginary vulnerable bodies.

reply

It doesn't make sense, particularly when they are dead, to stop playing the music. It doesn't punish them. Do you suppose people would not go to the hospital if it turned out someone who helped build it was a sex offender?

reply

Doesn't explain the nose job and the weird straight hair.

reply

People aren't offended by his skin bleaching or his insecurity with his ethnic features, hair and nose because they understand that during the time that Michael was growing up ONLY Caucasian features were considered beautiful and African-American features were considered ugly and bad. Did you not know about that? :-|

Did you not know there's a long history (or a short history really, because America is not that old) of ethnic features being marketed as ugly, bad and wrong? Literally marketed through propoganda posters, minstrel shows and stage plays about blackface. This was only a few decades ago.

Did you think that African-American features were actually widely accepted in the media when Michael was growing up? :-| Mariah Carey's label used to pretend she was white to give her a better chance. Michael Jackson was the first black pop star that they even allowed to become famous on MTV or television in general. He was the first black pop star who's image was widely distributed in the media around the world. When you don't have any representation in movies, or drawings in children's books that look like you, or faces on cereal boxes, and when a Mr.Roger's Neigborhood episode makes people flip the F out because Mr.Roger's dipped his feet in the same pool as a black man's feet for a few seconds....yeah you're gonna think that maybe you should have a thin nose and light skin lol.

David Bowie was the only one to call out MTV and ask why they didn't show black performer's music videos. It was considered mind blowing for Michael to sing "it doesn't matter if you're black and white." :-| You'll forgive him for being paranoid about his looks. I don't think you should tell African-Americans what they should be offended by. Saying someone is guilty of abuse is one thing, but your argument was that black people should think he's "mean to them" because he took away his black features. Lol. Both his white fans and black fans understand exactly why he did.

reply

MJ had vitiligo...the skin treatments were to fix the blotching....FFS READ.

What proof do you have that he hated his own race?

reply

"only in white America"

That is a racist statement and therefor you are a racist.

Congrats. See David Duke to get your cool hat.

reply

More ducking & dodging but no addressing the issue of how utterly unsubstantiated & disgusting this posthumous Michael Jackson public lynching really is.

reply

Were you there? Do you actually know if he did this or not? No, you don't. The only people who knew what happened were Michael Jackson and the kids he was with.

Speaking of deflecting, how about busting out the DEAD tired race card to justify the innocence of a man who was barely even black.

White American loved Michael Jackson. He owned the universe. Why the hell would anyone want to destroy him? Everyone loved him. He fucked up by having sleepovers with little kids, and more than likely sexually abused them, which if it's true, is some of the most horrific actions a human being can ever be capable of.

Shove your race card up your ass.

reply

I don't like the "white america" part, it's quite racist, but everything else you say is, sadly, true.
I don't think it's necessarily a racist plot: MJ was just an easy target, black or white, and america is, like you point out, a place where such a target is kept under the gun forever.
They would do the same if he were white because, the only color that counts here, is GREEN my friend.

reply

Jackson was tried once and found not guilty. That doesn't mean he's an innocent.

But I do agree that it's a fair point that he's dead and can't defend himself or get a trial. The truth is we'll probably never really know the truth about Jackson.

reply

We do know the truth because we heard indepth testimonies form 2 victims and testimonies from witnesses and other victims.

reply

More pulling "facts" out of thin air which is typical of the sick people who propagate this. Two discredited Johny come latey proven liars cashing in on the Jackson extortion industry, whose stories were so weak & inconsistent that their lawsuits were dismissed and the other 2 other cases which Michael Jackson was completely exonerated.

reply

did you watch the film?

reply

The lawsuit was dismissed solely because the statutes of limitations had run out. Stop making things up to support your position.

reply

Wrong. Their inconsistent stories had no merit. No court with an ounce of integrity is going to accept two verified liars soley at their word in pursuit of their absurd billion dollar money grab.

reply

Please provide a credible source where it shows the suit was dismissed for any reason other than the statute of limitations having run out.

Also, please provide a credible source for the "billion dollar money grab." The FACTS are no dollar amount was ever mentioned in the lawsuit.

reply

Provide a credible
source that explains away the glaring inconsistencies in their stories. Whether it's a billion dollars or hundreds of millions of dollars is a distinction without a difference when it comes to greed being the common denominator either way.

reply

If you don't like deflection and lying, don't do it yourself.

There's a HUGE difference between billions and millions. Someone floated out there the billions figure, and it's easy to see why.

reply

Lying about exactly what? If the reported $20+ million was enough in the first extortion case against Jackson than all you have to do is multiply that greed x a minimum of hundreds of millions. As i said a distinction without a significant difference. Temptation & greed either way.

reply

Oh please. You lied about:

1. The lawsuit being for a billion dollars.
2. That the lawsuit was dismissed for any other reason than the statute of limitations had run out.

Jebus, just own it. All you're doing is digging yourself a deeper hole.

Where you see extortion, others see payoff.

reply

What may be the exact amount of the reported billion dollar figure is another irrelevant deflection.You're deflecting by arguing the semantics of fairly insignificant details comes across as futile attempts of someone without a tangible defense of what is clearly a two part shamefully orchestrated posthumous media lynching & money grab.

reply

Deflection again. Just DON'T accuse anyone else of it, because that's your own MO. Found out in a lie? Deflect.

There was no amount named in their case. None. For all any of us know, it could have been $5k. Only they and their attorneys have any idea about that.

You do realise that all civil cases, every civil case ever tried, has to name some amount at some point? Do you believe every civil case is a money grab?

reply

With the lack of tangible facts on your side to legitimize your biased lynch mob crusade your rinse wash and repeat routine focused on of the same exact irrelivent sidetracking deflections is coming across as plain trolling. Not interested in playing that game.

reply

Deflection again. You're avoiding answering my questions because you can't.

reply

The estate is suing HBO for $100 million. That must be a money grab too.

reply

That's the most pathetic false equivalency I've ever seen

reply

😂

Because it doesn't suit your agenda.

reply

It's plain to see but that wouldn't fit the agenda of the lynch mob people of your ilk.

reply

"People of your ilk" 😂

Yep, well, when you've got nothing, there's always "people of your ilk" to fall back on.

reply

The juror in the film said they believed it could have happened, the burden is on the prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, and they didn't meet that standard, so they could not vote to convict.

reply

Racist moron.

reply

Nothing to do with race, this is about pedofilia

reply

Right. That's why the established the verified perverts like Woody Allen, Roman Polanski, Hugh Hefner, Bryan Singer , Elvis, Jimmy Paige, & dozens more examples of famous white men who are arbitrarily given passes for their sexual indiscretions involving minors. Never mind the reported Hollywood pedophile rings that aren't being talked about or investigated.

reply

You forgot R. Kelly on your list.

reply

The point was hoards & hoards of white male celebrities who aren't publicly persecuted. It's agenda driven, selective outrage.

R. Kelly is being taken down as we speak.

reply

Why did this innocent man pay off so many boy's parents? Are you blind, or do you really think that a middle-aged man should have little boys as his besties and call them every day?

If a white man had acted like this, he'd have gotten the same treatment, and would likely be in prison. That is, unless he was outrageously wealthy and had been the #1 pop star in the world. THEN he'd have gotten off.

PS -- why DID Jackson decide to use white makeup instead of his natural skin color for his vitiligo? He wasn't the only black man who had vitiligo. There was a reporter who had the same problem. Rather than slowly morph into a white man, he chose to use makeup that matched his natural skin tone, even though about 80% of his face had lost pigment. Because he was proud of being black and didn't want to look in the mirror and see someone else. MJ desperately wanted to look in the mirror and see someone else.

Yes, we are living in dangerous times in America -- if you're popular enough you don't even have to hide acting like a child molester. Everyone will give you a pass based on the skin color and facial characteristics you worked so hard to leave behind.

reply

Please stop astroturfing.

reply