MovieChat Forums > Loki (2021) Discussion > How come (spoilers)

How come (spoilers)


..the other (bad) variant is a female (Loki)? I don't get it.

reply

There are myriad variants. It could have been Teacup Loki or Bird Loki, but it happened to be Girl Loki.

reply

[deleted]

nope. It is a Variant: a version of THE SAME CHARACTER.

reply

Yes, of which there are many, many forms. One might be a puppy.

reply

Nope, since the TVA makes SURE there is only one timeline, the Sacred Timeline, it's literally IMPOSSIBLE to have other forms for the Loki in this universe.

Too hard for you?

reply

I'm explaining to you exactly what was presented in the show, which is consistent with the comics. That you don't understand, or choose not to understand, is fine, but don't insult me for trying to help you.

reply

yes, but "consistent with the comics" doesn't mean anything since comics aren't canon.

The show has yet to explain how multiple versions of Loki are possible. So, how do you know?

reply

Miss Minutes explained it. Throughout time there are numerous "Nexus Events" in which the flow of time is split. The TVA tries to rein them in, and prunes the ones they can, but they can't be everywhere at once. Each of those timelines experiences splits of their own. Each time one goes unpruned, a second timeline exists parallel to the first. Imagine that over billions of years. The universe is almost 14 billion years old, after all. On most timelines exists a Loki, and on any that came into being before his birth, different factors lead to different Lokis. Apparently, on one timeline, teacups evolved into Asgardians.

reply

> Each time one goes unpruned, a second timeline exists parallel to the first.

Ok, that would be when the graphic exceeds the red line on the TVA agents' handheld devices. Since there are already female - Hulk and Tour de France - Lokis it happened at least three times. Makes sense. Thanks!

reply

np

reply

"The TVA tries to rein them in, and prunes the ones they can, but they can't be everywhere at once."

actually they can since they are out of the normal time-space continuum.

And even if they cannot be everywhere, a different sex Loki is a far bigger variance than that random dude that gets purged for not picking up a ticket, would make NO sense for the TVA to pick up that variance and not a female Loki ...

reply

They are, but remember that they operate in real time. They have to become aware of a Nexus Event, get there, and stop it all within a certain amount of time.

Your last paragraph makes no sense whatsoever.

reply

remember in the first episode that random nobody that gets purged?

So you're saying that the TVA would prioritize that guy over someone as timeline disturbing as a female Loki? THAT makes no sense.

And to your point that they "can't be everywhere at once" - but they had tens of teams, that would mean that the judge would be swamped with cases, but apparently in the line there were ONLY 2 people: that random dude getting purged and Loki. And no one else after Loki. Not the crazy busy activity you are trying to paint.

So based on that scene we can get to the conclusion that no, the cases were not quite so overwhelming ...

reply

They've been trying, unsuccessfully, to capture and prune the female Loki. She hasn't gone unnoticed, she just has not been caught.

And, you are assuming that because there was only one other case on the day that our Loki was brought in, that over billions of years there were never times when there were dozens of cases at once, or a Nexus Event went unnoticed, or too many happened at once for them all to be handled, or a team arrived but failed and a new timeline happened.

If you want to base a conclusion on something you were shown in the show, you ought to conclude that at various times long ago, before the birth of Loki, a number of Nexus Events went unchecked, and a variety of timelines branched out, on which all manner of Lokis were born, including a teacup, a female, and one that looked like the Hulk, for we were definitively shown those outcomes.

reply

No, I didn't assume. It was shown in the show.

"They've been trying, unsuccessfully, to capture and prune the female Loki" - really? That female Loki was so awesome that since birth was so amazing that they couldn't capture her, even at 2 months old she manages to elude them. And somehow they couldn't catch her for several decades allowing her to become mature ... while our loki was picked up in one minute ... REALLY??

The nexus events don't happen "real time" - whatever you understand by that, we were shown how they went in different times in our timeline, from Pompeii to first WW and 20something.

So no, your assumptions that somehow they didn't have "time" to go to an event at some point while having 2 cases at a different point doesn't make any sense, sorry.

Or the show doesn't try to make any sense and it's just a mess ...

reply

Okay, you don't understand what was explained in the show.

The TVA would have no reason to look for the female Loki when she was 2 months old. Their sole mission is to wait for a Nexus Event to occur, then go reset it before it redlines.

Female Loki exists because at some time before Loki was born a Nexus Event took place, and it redlined. A new timeline came into being, and the TVA was too late, or otherwise unable, to reset it in time. Most likely, a number of such events happened before Loki's birth, which means there are lots of parallel timelines. On each of those parallel timelines exist new, un-reset Nexus Events, which created parallel timelines branching from the branches.

On one of those parallel timelines, when Loki was born, some previous circumstance lead to her being born female. Maybe her parents were delayed by a minute, or an hour, before conceiving her by some situation unique to their timeline. Who knows? The important thing is, something happened differently on that timeline, and they had a girl.

The TVA can do nothing about this. Even if they wanted to go around murdering babies, it wouldn't matter, because all they would do is create a new branch in the timeline. In effect, murdering baby Loki would be a Nexus Event, and they could let it go past redline, but there would still be a timeline in which girl Loki still exists.

When I wrote that they have being trying to capture female Loki, I mean they have been doing so after she did something that caused a Nexus Event. That's the only time they would even have been aware of her existence, and the only time they'd try to capture her.

I know it can be confusing-- all discussion of time travel is-- but going by the rules laid out in the MCU, this is what happened, and why female Loki exists.

reply

Well, not quite. The TVA states that there is ONLY ONE timeline: the sacred timeline. And ANY variation from that timeline is a Nexus event, so the birth of a female Loki IS a Nexus event and MUST be reset.

"But then the all knowing Time-Keepers emerged. Bringing peace by reorganizing the Multiverse into a single timeline, the Sacred Timeline."

"The Time-Keepers were formed because of a multiversal war, where different timelines battled each other for supremacy. They brought peace to the Multiverse by reorganizing it into a single timeline."

So you either have a single timeline or you don't. If you have a single timeline as the MCU wiki suggests then there is no timeline in which Loki could be a female because ... gasps ... there is NO OTHER timeline than the Sacred one ...

If you have multiple timelines then there is no TVA. If there is the TVA then you don't have multiple timelines.

"Though most of the time the Sacred Timeline chugs along according to the Time Keepers’ grand design, every now and then an individual and their pesky free will can interrupt that timeline with their actions. This is called a Nexus event and could be something as grandiose as starting a war or as simple as being late to work. Individuals who engage in Nexus events are known as Variants. "

As you can see, a Nexus event is ANY variation. The birth of a female Loki IS a Nexus event and the TVA WILL HAVE to reset it ASAP.

Let me say it again: if the TVA works to keep a unique timeline (The Sacred Timeline) then there should be exactly ZERO parallel timelines.

reply

A Nexus Event happens when someone messes with time, usually through time travel or some other manipulation of the flow of time. I think this is what is confusing you.

The birth of a female Loki is not a Nexus Event. It is something that might happen in the future, *after* a Nexus Event splits the timeline.

The TVA's goal is to keep their sacred timeline intact, but they don't always succeed.

reply

You didn't read!!!

Did you even WATCH the show? Watch the first episode again. The Miss minutes explains CLEARLY that a nexus event is "whatever you started a riot or you were just late for work" and she CLEARLY states the the lizards "reorganized the multiverse INTO A SINGLE TIMELINE".

Can your brain understand, after I repeated again and again, according to MCU it's A SINGLE timeline. There is NO splitting, because the TVA doesn't allow it. FFS.


Here: watch it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m5cQB2QtOE

Again: THERE IS ONLY ONE TIMELINE. Not two, not three, NOT MORE.

Just ONE.

And let's say that female loki IS from a different timeline (which as i said it's impossible since there is NO other timeline, as per the show) - why would she hang out and mess with OUR Loki timeline? And the TVA WHICH timeline is actually trying to fix?

The only way what you're saying would make sense only if there are multiple universes, each with it's own timeline. Or the timeline is not just one but then the show clearly states that it's JUST ONE.

reply

You're wrong, but there is no point in going back and forth. You don't want to learn, and you refuse to admit that you're wrong. Believe what you want.

reply

MCU: there is ONLY one timeline
Rando on the internet: but that means there are an infinite of timelines and an infinite versions of Loki
MCU: NO, there is ONLY ONE.
Rando on the internet: but that means there are more timelines ... and each timeline has a different Loki
MCU: NO, didn't you understand??? ONE FUCKING TIMELINE
Rando on the internet: but, but, but there could still be different timelines, right? right?
MCU: of for fuck's sake (smh)

reply

MCU: There is only one timeline

also MCU: There are numerous different versions of Loki and one of them was born a woman.

Rando on the internet: duuuuur.....

reply

Then MCU is confused and they don't know what they want :D

Nothing new.

reply

It's odd that the fact that a "variant" of Loki exists who was a variant from birth. She would have had to be born, grow up and spend 30 years living in her own universe before going rogue. They already clearly set the rules that after a few minutes a branched timeline passes a nexus point and can no longer be reset. The TVA would have had to reset lady loki as soon as she was born, or was conceived, or was taken by Odin, whichever was the splitting point. Clearly these things have never crossed your tiny mind.

reply

That was my point all along.

Here a quote from my post:

"As you can see, a Nexus event is ANY variation. The birth of a female Loki IS a Nexus event and the TVA WILL HAVE to reset it ASAP."

And another quote:

"That female Loki was so awesome that since birth was so amazing that they couldn't capture her, even at 2 months old she manages to elude them. And somehow they couldn't catch her for several decades allowing her to become mature"

learn to read ;)

reply

I think I assumed you were talking about the Loki tesseract thing and were talking about something else. You are correct and filmbuff is a moron.

reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcTQHo0soP8

this kinda explains why she is a female ...

Plus: it might not even be Loki but The Enchantress (Sylvie Lushton) ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enchantress_(Marvel_Comics)

Apparently it's even credited as Sylvie in the show credits ... (spanish language)

Plus Sylvie Lushton has her powers granted by Loki, so it would appear that the TVA is reading his signature as a result ...

https://insidethemagic.net/2021/06/lady-loki-actually-the-enchantress-ks1/
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/loki-lady-loki-enchantress-sylvie-lushton.html/

reply

And timeline that has branched can branch again an infinite number of times. So failing once is the same as failing an infinite number of times, which would render the whole thing piontless. Again, you are making stuff up. Nowhere in the series does it say that "sometimes they fail". It says that there was a mulitversal war, after which all timelines were merged to ONE timeline, and the TVA prunes branches from the sacred timeline.

reply

Nowhere does it say anything that you just wrote, either, at least not the part you are using to refute what I've written.

We've been told the following:

There were lots and lots of competing timelines, and the Time Keepers wrested them into one timeline.

The TVA exists to try to prevent new timelines from branching out, after what are known as Nexus Events.

When someone jumps timelines, almost anything they do can cause a split. Even something as simple as being late for work after a timeline split can have major repercussions down the road.

There are lots of Lokis who are very different from the one we know.

That's it. Everything else is up to us to surmise.

Nowhere have we ever been told that the TVA always succeeds. We know that a number of crews have been waylaid, and their reset charges stolen. We do not know if some of those new timelines redlined.

That a Teacup Loki, Hulk Loki, and (potentially) a female Loki exist, tell us that there must exist either alternate timelines or alternate universes that can access the "sacred" timeline.

In other words, what you wrote was never explicitly stated, NOR WAS IT IMPLIED, while what I'm theorizing, though also not explicity stated, was ABSOLUTELY implied. How else do we get, say, a Teacup Loki unless there was a redlined Nexus Event long before Loki's birth?

reply

No, you just made this up. The show clearly says that there is only one timeline. If there were lots of split timelines that were left unpruned, then what would the big deal be about pruning timelines at all in the first place? The timekeepers existed at the beginning of the universe, the director confirmed it. In the comics the universe goes through cycles and starts again from the beginning at the end of time. The multiversal war happened before this cycle of the universe, which is why the timekeepers want to prevent the timeline from splitting so that they stay in control. None of this explains why a female Loki can possibly exist, which means up to this point it remains a plot-hole.

reply

Can they prune a timeline that's already passed the limit? (that red line on their handheld devices)

If there are timelines that passed that limit and can't be pruned anymore, that would explain multiple Lokis. Except now, those timelines contradict with the "one sacred" timeline.

reply

Not always what is presented makes sense.

And no, you are not explaining what is presented in the show.

I will say again: if TVA’s job is to make sure there are no variations to the timeline is clear that a Loki feminine variant would be impossible, because the TVA would detect that and reset it to “normal” as they do with all other things that change, as shown in the show.

So the show states that the TVA controls the timeline and doesn’t allow variances and it’s resetting, or even purging, variants that steer off but they do allow a female variant to reach maturity? Doesn’t make too much sense.

reply

Loki can shapeshift at will though. Who's to say the variant version of him doesn't prefer to be a woman?

reply

That's a fair but different point.

reply

Because it was the superior Loki, and we all know that women are superior to men........*yawwwn*

reply

If you look for spiders behind a curtain, you will likely find them there.

reply

Not if they are NOT there.

reply

Usually, they are.

reply

Is this some ancient chinese proverb? Doesn't make much sense. We were told repeatedly that Captain Marvel was the most powerful hero in the MCU. We were told explicitly that Scarlet Witch is more powerful than the Sorcerer Supreme. We were shown that Shuri is smarter than Tony Start and Bruce Banner. I had already been spoiled that Lady Loki was in the show, so the comment about the "superior" variant stuck out like a sore thumb. I wasn't looking for it. If there are spiders crawling out of the walls and the floorboards, then there are probably some behind the curtains.

reply

I wasn't listening to anyone telling me things.. I just watched the show. the female loki worked for me. even their weird attraction to each other. But I wasn't hoping for much.

Just a show, to pass the time. And I'm appreciative there is apparently going to be a second series..

But yeah, if you already have in mind something will be what you think, when you see it, you'll find what you look for.

Not quite Chinese... I mean, my glass was broken long ago, but I didn't realise it till it broke...

reply

triggered?

reply

Marvel lost any benefit of a doubt, several years ago.

reply

Bored.

reply

It follows the comics. Sometimes loki has a female form.

reply

And it's the superior form :D

reply

If I'm looking to hookup with Loki, I suppose that would be true!

reply

It's just a Loki from another dimension/timeline. Remember how they shows all different ones they've captured over the years? It's just like that - another version.

reply

That's what confuses me: they showed different Lokis, Hulk-Loki, Tour de France winner Loki, etc. but how can that be? All different timelines are still inside our universe. If they'd show us different Lokis from different universes (instead of timelines), that would make sense, because a Loki that looks like Tom Hiddleston wouldn't exist in other universes (and vice versa)..

reply

...what?

reply

Let me rephrase the question: a Loki (played by Hiddleston) exists only in our universe, right? Several (Hiddleston) Lokis from different timelines, yes, (like several Gamoras or Nebulas); but a different Loki.. where exactly does female Loki (and Hulk-Loki, etc) come from? Multiverse? I still don't get it..

reply

kuato is too dumb to understand your completely valid points

reply

Multiverse, I presume, an alternate timeline where Loki was born female. Or uses his illusion power to appear female, because he likes it.

reply

But then another question comes up: does the TVA control multiple universes? Because that's not how they explained it (?). Maybe Doctor Strange 2 will shed some light on it!?

Edit: wording

reply

I presume they don't control multiple universes, because they seem to be dedicated to controlling timelines, that is, preventing access to multiple universes.

Damn, I hope that sentence makes some sense!

reply

Do you view alternative universes/timelines as the same thing?

reply

Pretty much, a timeline is more or less an alternate universe, where things happened differently by a little or a lot. Right?

I'm sure there's some serious sci-fi geek out there who wants to debate the difference, but there's a heat wave on here and I'm just not up for that.

reply

I think it gets confusing because I do think there are people who have used the terms interchangeably and those who have not.

Alternate timeline has always struck me as something that replaced what originally happened. Someone messed with time and created a new timeline; replacing the original one. Like in Back to the Future 2.

Alternate universe/parallel dimension always implies a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. Earth, Asgaard, Mars, etc. That's where a Multiverse comes into play.

reply

IMHO an alternate timeline isn't one that replaces what originally happened, I thought the idea was that all timelines exist simultaneously, and all are equally valid except to the people within a given timeline. To them the timeline they're in is the "real" one, the one and only true one, and same for the people in all the other timelines. And it seems the Timekeepers have taken this to an extreme.

The only thing I can say for sure is that in all science fiction, traveling between timelines is asking for trouble.

reply

"IMHO an alternate timeline isn't one that replaces what originally happened, I thought the idea was that all timelines exist simultaneously,"

I know, but that was sort of my mind - it's portrayed differently in different works, which makes it a little confusing. In Back to the Future it replaces the original timeline. In the MCU we were TOLD - though it was never really proven - that it coexists "along side" one another; but here we are seeing multiple Lokis.

reply

Well presumably the multiple Lokis are all traveling between timelines, or getting into the "real" one, which true to the laws of sci-fi saying skipping timelines is bad.

reply

But for there to be multiple Lokis there has to be multiple timelines and we were told there's only 1 before girl Loki did what she did. Either The Avengers didn't fix it or it's a plot hole.

reply

We're told there's one TRUE timeline, which does imply the existence of other, less desirable timelines.

reply

We are showed it too though. In Endgame, the fixed everything to make sure the main timeline is the only one. The "training video" at the TVA shows many becoming one. At the end of the most recent episode, many timelines are seen branching off as a result of Lady Loki setting those bomb thingies off.

But the fact that she exists is confusing. Before that, we only see one timeline. So how are their alternate Lokis? It's a potential plot hole.

reply

Well, I wouldn't accept that "training video" at the TVA as an explanation of the real physics, more like what they want the variants to believe.

reply

So you think the TVA is actively lying about their being more than one timeline (currently? That's certainly possible, I'm just confirming that's what you're saying?

reply

It's a possibility. Certainly I'd expect that cute little video they show the Variants to be an oversimplification at best, and not the whole truth.

reply

This discussion is making me want a war between the TVAs of two different dimensions.

reply

Perhaps Loki will be kind enough to arrange such a war!

He does want them out of his hair, after all.

reply

There is no difference. The only possible way of drawing a line is if you say that the alternate universe was a different universe from its birth. But then it would be totally different, have different laws of physics and would not have any loki's in it. I suppose the Dark dimension is something like this? What are the "realms" again? Was Asgard an alternate universe? That always confused me.

reply

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------nounNorth American
noun: alternate; plural noun: alternates
/ˈôltərnət/

a person who acts as a deputy or substitute.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There's differences depending on the work of fiction.

Back to the Future says meddling with the past changes the past. There's still only 1 Earth, just a different Earth because history was changed.

In comics and the MCU it means multiple Earth's existing at the same time. That's their version of it, but they are technically using the word incorrectly.

Asgard is just another planet.

reply

Asgard is not a planet, it is referred to as a "realm" and in The Dark World portals are opened to the nine "realms" which are clearly other universes. According to comics it is a "pocket dimension".

I am not talking about rules of time travel. I am talking about he difference between a "timeline" created by a nexus event, and the "multiverse". Is there a difference between an alternate universe and an alternate timeline and if so what?

reply

What the fuck is a "realm" if not a planet?

It's in the Milky Way:

"Asgard, also known as the Realm Eternal, was one of the Nine Realms, located at the center of the milky way galaxy."

https://marvelcinematicdatabase.fandom.com/wiki/Asgard

It's one of the Nine Realms. Earth is one. They call our PLANET a realm. It's just a word. Asgaard is still a physical tangible place in our universe.

I answered that - it depends on the person telling the story.

https://marvelcinematicdatabase.fandom.com/wiki/Nine_Realms

https://marvelcinematicuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Realms

reply

Calm down. Asgard is not a planet, it says so in the link you shared. Did you not bother to read more than 2 sentences? But "what is a realm" is a good question. I was going by the Marvel comics, in which they are seperate dimensions, which actually is more consistent than the fudged MCU version.

reply

"a Loki (played by Hiddleston) exists only in our universe, right?" who said that?

Who says that the Loki from a different universe MUST be different? it COULD be different but it DOESN'T have to.

reply

You had to go there :) If there are infinite universes in the multiverse, then yes, there are, mathematically speaking, infinite Lokis that look likeTom Hiddleston. Satisfied?

reply

Just trying to understand your train of thoughts, don't get so easily offended D :P

reply

NP ;) Might be my English, still learning.

reply

There could be another timeline where Loki looks the same, but he's a sweet guy who's given up mischief and is using his illusion powers to "heal" visible deformities in children from developing countries.

reply

Oh, well I don't think you're gonna get an answer to all of that in the character's first appearance.

Alternate universe/timeline/Multiverse, I presume. But I get what you are saying, because we are led to believe there was only 1, because the Avengers saw to that.

I think there's a few possibilities.

1. The Avengers were wrong and didn't fix the timeline and there ARE multiples ones.

2. I don't think alternative universes (the Multiverse) and alternate timelines are necessarily the same thing.

reply

I would go for 2. They are not the same thing ...

reply

If you rather skip looking up the character’s history in Marvel, then just keep this in mind: Variant. That said, the popular theory is she’s not really Loki (any variant of Loki). ‘Matter of fact, her being someone other than “Lady Loki” (Enchantress) seems like a foregone conclusion to many. I still say… stay away from popular theories from now on! XD

If this *is* who we’re supposed to believe it is though, then fantastic. (If not, bring on the character that’s expected.) And why female? Why not HER? Either way, this is in fact all based on the comics. Yes, female Loki? Guess what…. it’s also based on the legend.

But this not coming from out of nowhere is something the propagandist reich wing incel manbabies (who thank f’n goodness Marvel, Disney and most studios today will never appease) couldn’t care any less about. (To say they can’t tolerate the supposed agenda they have a real agenda against would be an understatement.) Hell, but if this wasn’t based on any previous thing, I wouldn’t be bothered by it one damn bit. Loki be…. gender fluid?!? REEEEE! WOKE PC ANTI-STRAIGHT WHITE BRO AGENDA! Yeah son, reality and the non-reactionary agenda triggering the con reich as always (spewing their tired fascist red pill drivel like the projecting little snowflaky chuds they be, what else is new).

reply

It makes no sense.

A variant is a version of the EXACT character in that universe. No, you cannot have a Variant being a different sex, unless shapeshifting. Or, is a Variant of a different Loki from a different universe, then why hiding in and altering this one?

reply

A nice discussion about a cool show and you go and shit in the middle of it like some homeless lunatic. Your first two paragraphs were very nice and I agree with them. Then you schitzo'd out and spilled hatred into the formerly good soup.

Political people ...

reply

Actually you make a good point. If all the variants come from the same universe but are produced as alterations of the main timeline then they should ALL be versions of the main one. Which is a male.

Unless that Variant is coming from a different universe or it was shapeshifted (which would be strange since she had the horns, no need to shapeshift unless you want to hide who you are ...)

reply

There's an alligator Loki.

reply