Maybe you shouldn't have linked to that "review". I mean, how dumb is this? I feel I should apologise for even repeating it, it's so embarrassingly childish...

"This is the first one, the World War nobody remembers, (Many descendant relatives still do), about which everyone alive 100 years ago can no longer offer any first-hand information (well, duh!). But major wars live on in libraries and movies, (and in living people's memories; see the second World War!) rarely as exciting or suspenseful as the epic and urgently demanding 1917. Even if you’re too young to care (or to write a sensible movie review), it’s a war movie that will leave you breathless."

Whoever wrote that and submitted it for uploading must have been struggling with his/her first drink of sweet wine at Xmas. Childish, uninformed, and more than a little dumb.

[–] mikeflatley (756) 4 years ago

I like Enemy at da Gatez esp when he wuz havin sex wid Rachel Weisz and she wanted 2 orgasm but didn’t wanna make a scene wid all da troopz there

[–] rudeboymurray (3241) 4 years ago

Letters from Iwo Jima, Tigerland, Downfall, Sophie Scholl: The Final Days, City of Life and Death and Testament of Youth are all better than 1917, and I'm sure there are others I'm forgetting.

However, 1917 is a very good film and better than Saving Private Ryan.