MovieChat Forums > Triangle of Sadness (2022) Discussion > Ummm, very unappealing title. WTF?

Ummm, very unappealing title. WTF?


why would I wnt to watch a movie with that title? lmao

It doesnt even sound like a movie title. Sounds like a NYT article of marital infidelity lol

reply

Summary even more of a turn off, for me anyway

"A fashion model celebrity couple join an eventful cruise for the super-rich."

reply

I don't care about the title so much as the apparent gross-out marketing.

reply

It's not for you.

reply

You can say that again lol

reply

The title is explained early in the film, it has little to do with the actual plot.

Not sure I completely understand why the title would turn you off anyway. Did you boycott the film Misery for the same reasons?

reply

Well, historically titles are chosen as a marketing tool, to sell the movie. Often they are irrelevant to the plot or content.

You are correct I have not seen misery, but not because of the title, ; because I dont care for King and also that leg breaking scene.

I stand by my post, that this title sux.

reply

What King novels have you read?

reply

I dont recall. Why?

reply

Just always like to know what novels people have read when they claim to not care for King. Usually the answer is 0 and they’re basing it on movies based on his works that have nothing to do with him.

reply

But this is a movie board, and all my posts are about movies, so not sure why you bring up novels?

And for that matter not sure why the other guy brought up misery either, lol.


reply

Haha, fair, but as a hardcore King fan it always irks me when people say they don't like him but have never read anything he's actually written. I guess I would prefer if people said "I don't like movies based on King's novels" :P

reply

"" I guess I would prefer if people said "I don't like movies based on King's novels"""

ummm, I think I already did say that:

"But this is a movie board, and all my posts are about movies, so not sure why you bring up novels?"

reply

God damn, again, I thought we were being playful here, did you just get beat up or something and decided to come back all grumpy? Jeez Louise!

reply

i am just fatigued and headed to bed. i am sorry. take care

reply

Aw. Get some sleep, friend! :)

reply

all better lol

reply

But, do i have to actually read king to know he is not to my tastes?

reply

Definitely. You sound like that old lady in the grocery store who approached King and said he should be ashamed of his work, and that he should write nice stories "like that Shawshank Redemption."

reply

no, i don't. i can spot signs that his content is not to my tastes.

reply

Lol, woah! I thought we were being playful here, what the heck! You literally asked me a question and I answered it, how is that sticking my nose where it doesn't belong?! You also posted this to a public forum; if you didn't want any feedback, why would you ask it in the first place?!

--I don't recall calling you ignorant

--You seem to be the literal version of the "Don't judge a book by its cover" warning. If you don't want to watch a movie because its title sounds sad, then just don't watch that movie I guess. Why subject us all to your nonsense?

reply

you likened me to the lady who suggested he write shawshank, but who was unaware he wrote it already.

that was pretty demeaning. and yeah, i was being quite amicable until i saw that line about the old lady. so that's on you. don't try to turn it around.






reply

But you're literally doing that. You're saying you don't like King, but you know nothing about him. That's not me being mean, that's you admitting to not liking something that you know nothing about...

reply

From above: Aw! Get some sleep, friend! :)

reply

[deleted]