Without a gun, the Joker would not be
Imagine guns not being allowed, Arthur's friend could not have gotten a gun for him, not that easy atleast and it would have cost a fortune to get one illegal, he would not have bothered, he could not afford one, maybe he would have given Arthur a can of maze instead.
Now, if Arthur had not shot those 3 bullys, had he not shot the talk show host, there would be no Joker, there would be no story.
If guns were not allowed in the US, and the laws were like in europe for instance, 85% of hollywood movie would and could not be made because guns feature in so many of them.
So the movie business must actually be the biggest advocate for guns still being legal to own and buy in the US, despite hollywood actors seemingly against them.......
Does anyone understand what i mean?
No easily available gun, no murders, no joker, no movie........ guns make movies, guns make money.
I am european, i have no problem with the US and their guns, all i am saying, no gun, no Joker....... am i right?