MovieChat Forums > Joker (2019) Discussion > 'Joker' Sparks Anger for Using Song by C...

'Joker' Sparks Anger for Using Song by Convicted Pedophile Gary Glitter


oops

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/joker-anger-use-song-by-convicted-pedophile-gary-glitter-1245803

reply

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2019-10-11/joker-gary-glitter-rock-and-roll-part-2

"For “Joker,” much of the criticism is centered on assumptions that Glitter was personally profiting from its use in the film, but Glitter sold away all his rights to the recording and publishing of “Rock and Roll Part 2,” co-written by the late Mike Leander, as well as his other songs more than two decades ago, according to Snapper Music, the London-based label that now owns Glitter’s master recordings.

“Gary Glitter does not get paid,” said a spokesman for Snapper in London who asked to remain anonymous. “We’ve had no contact with him.” The song consistently attracted filmmakers and TV showrunners long before “Joker,” landing in “Meet the Fockers,” “Boyhood,” “South Park” and “The Office.” “People generally come to us,” added the spokesman. “We don’t promote it at all.”

Snapper purchased the masters to Glitter’s catalog in January 1997, several months before the singer’s legal problems began with the discovery of child pornography on his laptop and in his home. His new label’s plans for a retrospective album were quickly canceled. Unlike other legacy artists on the label, Snapper does not sell physical copies of Glitter’s records, which are available only as digital streams and downloads.

In the U.S., rights to the songwriting on “Rock and Roll Part 2" belong to Universal Music Publishing Group, which represents Glitter, and BMG, which represents Leander. A representative for Universal’s publishing group stated: “Gary Glitter’s publishing interest in the copyright of his songs is owned by UMPG and other parties, therefore UMPG does not pay him any royalties or other considerations.”

reply

that is good to hear that he is not making money from it.

reply

Why doesn’t every radio station, everywhere spark outrage over playing this song instead of sensationalizing it’s use for a movie? Oh and also God knows maybe the thousandth movie to feature it on its soundtrack?

Me thinks someone is trolling.

reply

Why does the song sound like Dr. Who?

I thought the song fit well for the scene.

reply

Instead of a mass shooting like CNN was crying about was gonna happen we hear a song by a pedo in the movie which is even worse😬😬😬

reply

Snapper Music has confirmed Glitter will not recieve royalties for R&Rp2.

https://screenrant.com/joker-movie-gary-glitter-song-sex-offender-no-royalties/

Lol, be mad about something else haters!

reply

nothing wrong with hating pedophiles.

reply

They don't hate pedos(see Salon.com) it's all manufactured outrage and not real. The simple fatc is that this movie turns their narrative upside down, and they hate everything about it.

The salt is delicious.

reply

Anger over any song is purely lib bullshit.

None had a problem until 1 person pointed, then latch on... don't be leeches.

reply

Personally I think it's dumb to boycot a song just because the guy that made it did something bad. By that logic we should all burn our copies of Predator, Die Hard 1 and 3, Last Action Hero, and the Thomas Crown Affair just because John Mctiernan went to prison for not paying his taxes.

reply

And movies like The Pianist directed by Roman Polanski, or Wagner's music playing in concerts. Scummy people can create great art - it's just something we have to accept. Trying to wipe it away, even though the art itself is harmless, is a futile childish mentality. Classic "throwing the baby out with the bathwater".

reply

[deleted]