MovieChat Forums > Joker (2019) Discussion > Okay guys...the actuals are in...

Okay guys...the actuals are in...


The actual weekend gross was over 96 million...2.5 million OVER yesterday's 93.5 million estimate.

This is really going to leg out, guys.

reply

Overseas jumped up by almost 10 million...global opening weekend is now 247 million.

That's a quarter of a billion, guys, in three days time.

On a 60 million dollar budget.

Just let that sink on for a moment guys...

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2268) 2 hours ago
Overseas jumped up by almost 10 million...global opening weekend is now 247 million.

That's a quarter of a billion, guys, in three days time.

On a 60 million dollar budget.

Just let that sink on for a moment guys...
You should be hoping that your own comments don't sink. 🤡🤡🤡

If only you had the wherewithal to cover your favorite topics (Warner, Universal, Boxoffice) with a bit of research and even a bit of biased opinionated commentary. I misspoke, you already provide the biased opinionated commentary that uses a ton of hyperbole with a dab of simplicity. Give a critical viewing to Grace Randolph to see how it is done:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhF5CgHhIB4

Grace reports that the budget for The Joker is $70 Million and not the $60 Million as you have been flaunting and touting. She even backs up some of the budget spend with some detail. Additionally Grace reports that the Marketing and Advertising spend is at around $120 Million. I have also seen a $55-$70 Million production budget early on from Wikipedia.

Screenrant has a $64 Million budget reported. Where did you source your "The Joker" budget from?

Even with a $70 Million production budget The Joker is performing quite well and will probably have a financially great Box Office run. But as usual it is NOT going to be the earthshaking senses staggering Global Smash that you are hawking.

Thoughts on Grace's comments?

reply

If true, then it is STILL a low budget for a CBM.

As far as the marketing budget...it doesn't matter how expensive it was. It doesn't count against the theatrical profitability. It's covered by home media sales(per billbrown).

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2270) 3 minutes ago
If true, then it is STILL a low budget for a CBM.
Who is disputing that The Joker is NOT a low budget CBM? If you actually listened to that report by Grace Randolph even she is wondering where that rather meager Production Budget went, even though she gave a nod towards CGI and VFX as the probable culprit.

What are you so sensitive and defensive about by bringing up "Low Budget" for a CBM? For a CBM that is just about normal humans why would the Production cost NOT be quite low?

You ignored everything else that I asked you about.

reply

.

reply

.

reply

Sorry...uhhh I got my 60 million number from Scott Mendelson.

I answered what I thought of her comments. Sorry if you don't find them to be adequate. The sets/CGI and recreation of 1981costs money. I think the film has a "big-budget" look regardless of few action sequences.

Hey...I see billbrown is back. Maybe you can see if the "confirmed reports" of a "special deal" Disney got for TLK was something he gleaned from his regular perusing of SEC filings.

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2273) 13 minutes ago
Sorry...uhhh I got my 60 million number from Scott Mandelson.
Scott Mendelson's August 28th article has him reporting on the Joker budget as $55 Million. Scott also shared the following about WB's year-end slate:
Speaking as a film critic, I think Warner Bros.' end-of-year slate looks terrific, and I'm thrilled that one of the major studios is putting out such a slate in this era. But as a box office pundit... god, I'd love to be wrong. That's doubly-true considering that the likes of The LEGO Movie 2 ($191 million worldwide on a $100 million budget) and Godzilla: King of the Monsters ($385 million/$170 million) outright bombed while Shazam! ($363 million/$90 million) and Pokemon: Detective Pikachu merely performed "well" ($431 million/$150 million).

The great irony of Joker is its duel existence is both one of the least commercial movies of the year (it's an R-rated adult drama starring a Film Twitter fav about a guy succumbing to mental illness and life's many indignities) and one of the most commercial movies of the year (it's a prequel origin story for The Joker). It's a perfect example of how comic book superhero movies have essentially swallowed conventional genre cinema whole.
As you have been uber-promoting, or should I saw fawning, over the Box office performance of almost ALL of those titles, he projects a not so successful year for WB.

Scott Mendelson writes his articles with an eye and a nod to the investor in the studios as a service he provides. I understand his narrative and his stance. Do you?

reply

Oh no...I never noticed that he writes for Forbes. How silly of me. Please continue on with your haughty and pretentious act...it's not tiresome at all.

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2280) 3 hours ago
Oh no...I never noticed that he writes for Forbes. How silly of me. Please continue on with your haughty and pretentious act...it's not tiresome at all.
I guarantee you I am neither acting nor am I being pretentious. 😂 It wasn't the working for Forbes that I keyed your attention to but his past writings for https://www.fool.com/, The Motley Fool, where he and a second writer would report on both sides of the film industry performance and studios, kind of a "fair and balanced" or "Pro versus Con" duo. Bottom line was that his position had an agenda for his employer and that was to get you to BUY or SELL through them as an Advisor. That was my only full-disclosure. So haughty of me to do that. 🤦‍♂️

reply

I know how Mendelson's name is spelled, thank you. My phone always wants to change it to "Mandelson" for some reason. I edited my post.

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2302) an hour ago
I know how Mendelson's name is spelled, thank you. My phone always wants to change it to "Mandelson" for some reason. I edited my post.
You sure editing your post is a wise thing to do given your history with BillBrown????

I kid, I kid!!!

In other meanderings.... Given what is sure to be Boffo box office results for the Joker will there be a "The Joker Deuce:Die Laughing" the sequel? You've also yet to give an infamous and legendary "Gut" prediction. Methinks you're a bit gun shy after so many poor predicts and are waiting to see which way the financial tide is flowing?

The Joker opened higher than Justice League.
Has a higher Cinema Score than JL.
Has a higher RT score than JL, audience and critics.
Does have a lower IP value than JL. Your concept not mine. 😎
Has little if any real competition.
Has a longer run-time than JL but infinitely more story and a better received story.
Has an oddly high social media value than JL, along with WB "Goodwill".
Has Oscar Buzz.

That would mean the absolute floor has to be JL's performance both domestic and International.

$700 Million.

What say you ol' Boxoffice Savant, sleuth of the financial predictions, imperfect Prognosticator of Pecuniary Performance? Sharing is caring!

Did you make a prediction for The Joker and we all just missed it?

reply

I wouldn't be surprised if it crosses 300 million domestic but a 'safe" prediction would be around 260 million domestic. Overseas has really been a surprise so hard to predict how far it goes. We may be looking at a worldwide close to 900 million.

reply

[–] QueenFanUSA (2304) an hour ago
I wouldn't be surprised if it crosses 300 million domestic but a 'safe" prediction would be around 260 million domestic. Overseas has really been a surprise so hard to predict how far it goes. We may be looking at a worldwide close to 900 million.
That's an interesting prediction for the Joker. $260 Million domestic and a $640 Million International. JL did ~$428 Million Internationally and just shows you how JL was received so poorly. JL should have been a $2 Billion dollar film easily with all of WB's favorite and best IP's in the mix. Best besides Cyborg. That no doubt hurt JL by having Cyborg instead of Green Lantern or at least The Martian Manhunter.

Do you think WB will be disappointed if The Joker doesn't hit that amount given the amount of critical praise and apparent audience enthusiasm? Has WB found it's groove and an audience for their films?

On a side note I discovered this little missive from you:
Now...you had a quasi-defender on these boards that goes by "Norrinrad" suggest that the answer may be fpound in Disney's SEC Filings. He implied that maybe THAT is the "confirmed report" for this SPECIFIC TLK "special deal"? Do you peruse SEC Filings? Seriously? LOL I dunno...if I was to bet dollars to donuts I'd say "no". Honestly, you just don't strike me as someone that does that in your spare time.
While I don't mind the "shout-out" I am NOT a BillBrown defender or quasi-defender. Neither am I a QueenFanUSA attacker. I'm not even a mediator between you two knife wielding combatants. As I have said once before, "Stay Focused", this is the Joker Board. Your little Disney contract based on "Confirmed Reports" brouhaha has little if anything to do with me.

I am tempted to say, "Keep my name OUT of your mouth!", but I did suggest to you possible "sources" for the content of BillBrown's statement.

reply

Okay guys...the actuals are in...


The actual weekend gross was over 96 million...2.5 million OVER yesterday's 93.5 million estimate.

^^^^^


Man I'm just having a really hard time Understanding what is going on here???

or more specifically, I'm just not understand why you Queen are making these threads?

again I get why anyone(Other than you) would want to make a thread noting A film "Increased in Box office" from the estimates

but Unfortunately I just dont get why You are doing it? It goes completely AGAINST your history....

for example

I do Not remember you making a thread saying "Okay guys...the actuals are in..." When Avengers Endgame Increased from 350 M on Estimates to 358 Million on Actuals?

I do Not remember you making a thread saying "Okay guys...the actuals are in..." when The Lion King increased from 185 M on Estimates to 191 Million on Actuals?

I do Not remember you making a thread saying ""Okay guys...the actuals are in..." when Toy Story 4 increased from 118 M on Estimates to 120 Million on Actuals?

I do Not remember you making a thread saying ""Okay guys...the actuals are in..." when Aladdin increased from 86 M on Estimates to 91 Million on Actuals?

I do Not remember you making a thread saying ""Okay guys...the actuals are in..." when Black Panther increased from 192 M on Estimates to 201 Million on Actuals?

I do Not remember you making a thread saying ""Okay guys...the actuals are in..." when Avengers IW increased from 250 M on Estimates to 257 Million on Actuals?



Now hang with here, because I'm about to suggest something completely crazy....

but it almost seems like your intentionally not Making Positive threads noting Great Box office for Disney films

now again This just crazy right now? because this would prove you are in fact BIASED and are Trolling...Yet Queen you strongly deny trolling and being Biased toward Disney.

but Boy it just seem so odd though that Disney has so many box office hits that seem to be doing the exact same thing you are Praising other movies for, yet for some reason you are as quiet as a ghost when a Disney film not only does the same thing but does it better and makes/increases even more














basically Queen.....

this is another example of what makes you the worst at trolling....

While I get on the surface why you'd make this thread, Hilariously though really all this thread does is make it impossible for you not to be seen as Biased and confirms your just trolling....

you need to think about these things before hitting "post"

reply

I have noted the box office on every one of the film's you listed.

The problem that I have noted with all of those Disney films is that they are so damned expensive. The Joker has a budget of 60 million dollars!

Now...just let that sink in for a moment bill...

reply

What will you do now queen , go out with your friends and celebrate? Troll fans of Dinsey movies ? Wind bill brown up some more ? Tell me what needs to sink in? That a movie was very profitable on OW? Were you not around when paranormal activity was released?

Whats the ROI for joker ? Dont answer that you wouldnt have a clue.

reply

The problem that I have noted with all of those Disney films is that they are so damned expensive. The Joker has a budget of 60 million dollars!

Now...just let that sink in for a moment bill...

^^^

Poor queen, didnt think before you post.....

Queen, if theres 1 THING you have made very clear about your beliefs and standards when it comes to box office is ...YOU care MOST about PROFIT!

at the end of the day, all your trolling can be circled back to.....Profit....


lol your trying to use the excuse, You didnt Note Disney Films box office because of expensive Budgets....Yet Those Disney films with expensive Budgets Went on to Make Astonishing Larger amounts of Profit than the WB films your Noting with Modest Budgets.

what good are WB's Modest Budgets If They arent Making any Profit

you bragged about Shazam's "Modest" 80 Million Budget, which ultimately ended up making NO Profit.

Which is more NOTE Worthy, Aladdin's "Expensive" Budget that resulted in Hundreds of million in Profit or Shazam "modest" budget with netted no Profit?


how Is Joker and its Modest Budget More note worthy than The Lion King and Its expensive budget, When the end result is going to be Disney Will Net MORE profit than WB ?

you just didnt think Queen, You excuse of "smaller budgets" only works and makes sense If the End Result is WB is making MORE profit than Disney with their expensive budgets...

The films I listed above are Making between 350 to 700 M+ in profit from Disney.

I'm sorry Queen, But based on YOUR own history of trolling where you made it pretty clear, PROFIT is the most important thing, Disney and their "expensive" budgets are resulting in The Much More NOTE WORTHY success and Profits...



also...please take at least 1 Minute to think before hitting "post"....this excuse you desperately tried to come up with saying "you dont note Disney films because they are too expensive" completely falls on its face when you think about your history...

again You have no Problem NOTING WB's extremely Expensive movies.....You had no Problem Making Dozens of threads for Justice League(300 M+), Ready Player One(185 to 200 M+) and Godzilla 2(170 M+)....Hilariously You Prematurely tried to claim all these films were box office hits, You made threads Noting their pre release hype, Tried to spin their low Opening Weekend, then made threads claiming They would Leg out before finally given up and taking the walk of shame.

bottom line, You need think of better excuses, Literally ask yourself before posting "wait, I'm about to give some desperate excuse, does it make sense?...is what I'm about to say literally going to go against My entire history here on these boards"


the facts are, You have proven, Budget sizes does not matter...you history unequivocally shows that "expensive" budgets dont matter to you as you have embarrassingly tried to make threads for WB films with Massive budgets that go on to be flops...

you dont have a leg to stand on....Not only are Disney's "Expensive" films More successful and Literally Making Double and Triple the Profit of WBs "Smaller" budget Films....But You've proven beyond all doubt your more than happy to make Threads for "expensive" films....ummmm you know just as long as they are not Disney...



PS.....


I have noted the box office on every one of the film's you listed.

^^^

No you havent....

you've done the opposite...

just for the Ultimate Example...here....

so, You IMMEDIATELY make a thread Sunday, reporting Jokers 93 Million, where you claim Its Amazing and you bet its going to increase.....The next day within 5 minutes of actuals coming out you IMMEDIATELY make a thread bragging about the increase.

Yet, In April Avengers Endgame comes out to an unearthly 350 Million(near 100 Million more than you predicted and expected) You not only DONT make a thread, You instead start replying with "Too bad it didnt make 358 Million instead of just 350 M", The next The day actuals come, Shockingly you dont IMMEDIATELY make a thread reporting that Endgame in fact increased 8 million and came in at the 358 Million you were trolling about, You instead then Hide for the next 5 days, Only to return and claim "EG is going to have big drops in its 2nd weekend"


lol You have somehow trolled yourself into a corner where you truly have to no escape, whatever you say, whatever excuse you try to come up with, all I have to do, Is OWN you with you own history...All I have to do is wait for you come up with some desperate excuse, and Then Take your Own Words, History and past trolling to destroy...theres nothing you can do to overcome Your History


reply

LOL

Once again...how can you say Shazam made "NO Profit"?

Using YOUR idiotic financial model it made at least 90 million for WB.

Remember...you said that marketing costs don't count against a film's theatrical run. You said they are "covered by home media".

Soooo...

Budget: 90 million
WW Gross: 360 million
Breakeven point: 180 million
Net profit: 90 million

I'm just using YOUR stupid "math".

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

reply

And...uh...bill?

Are you finally going to come clean and admit you made up the whole thing about "confirmed reports"(your exact words) of a "special deal"(again your exact words) Disney got for The Lion King where they get 67% of domestic ticket sales and 55% of international grosses?

I mean...even your defenders on this board can't find these " confirmed reports". I even made an open plea a couple of months ago for SOMEONE to please steer me in the direction of these "confirmed reports" but...nothing.

reply

Hey bill...

Now...LOL...AGAIN...about those "confirmed reports" of a "special deal" Disney got for The Lion King of a whopping 67% of domestic ticket sales/gross and 55% of international grosses...just where are they?

Not ONE to be found. There are "confirmed reports" of a "special deal" for The Last Jedi(and you can bet your ASS that won't happen again for Rise of Skywalker LOL) but Not. A. One.

Now...you had a quasi-defender on these boards that goes by "Norrinrad" suggest that the answer may be fpound in Disney's SEC Filings. He implied that maybe THAT is the "confirmed report" for this SPECIFIC TLK "special deal"? Do you peruse SEC Filings? Seriously? LOL I dunno...if I was to bet dollars to donuts I'd say "no". Honestly, you just don't strike me as someone that does that in your spare time.

reply

Box Mojo has Joker at 250 million worldwide with the biggest October opening EVER in the U.S. That's outstanding for a movie that cost between 55-70 million.

reply

LOL...uhhhh...THAT's an understatement.

LOL

reply

Good.

The media campaign to sabotage this movie really backfired.

The Streisand effect is alive and well.

reply

I'll probably see it this coming weekend. I'm not a fan of comic book movies, but it seems to be living up to the hype, and isn't an action movie.

It does feel like it has some legs. Usually I skip the theaters altogether.

reply