MovieChat Forums > Spider-Man: Far from Home (2019) Discussion > Challenge to budding scriptwriters...

Challenge to budding scriptwriters...


Your challenge:

i. How would you set up/ explain Spider-Man in the Sony Spider-verse?
ii. How would you write him out of the MCU?

My suggestions:

i. The first Sony Spider-Man movie opens with Tom Holland -- already established as Spider-man, no origin story needed again at this point, thank you -- waking up and telling his aunt that he had another one of his really weird dreams that he was part of this bigger group of superheroes -- no specific names mentioned.

In fact, he would wake up to the sound of J. K. Simmons as Jonah Jameson spouting off about Spider-Man on the TV in the background. This would make a natural segue from 'Far from Home'. (I assume Sony owns Simmons, portrayal contractually since he originated on their side of the house.)

His aunt explains that his strange dreams are probably due to residual anxiety from the death of his uncle a year ago, and from being a lone superhero. She would point out that since the death of his uncle he has had no father figure, or mentor, to guide him -- an oblique reference to Iron Man / Tony Stark without dropping his name.

Here's the humour though... every character in this new universe... May Parker, MJ, etc... looks almost identical to the actors who played them in the MCU. Something of an inside joke. Sony would do a search to find suitable actors.

ii. On the MCU side, they have it much easier. The end-credits scene where Spider-Man's identity was openly revealed gives them an easy excuse to explain his absence. 'He had to go into hiding to protect his family and friends'... a sort of superhero witness protection plan, maybe by faking his death. Furthermore, he was overwhelmed by the enormous pressure of having to live up to Tony Stark's expectations of him, and he needed a break from the world-threatening stuff.

A quick scene with Nick Fury, or Happy Hogan, referencing him only as 'the kid' -- again no explicit name dropping although we all know who he's talking about.

This also allows the character to re-enter the MCU at some future point with minimum issues.

Any takers? Studios might be reading this stuff, you never know...

reply

Call my jaded, but having seen the previous two Sony Spider-Man films and the Venom film, I don't think it matters. If Sony really is getting Spider-Man back, they're going to make a few more terrible films, lose money, then give up for awhile before the inevitable reboot. They can explain him however they want. Marvel doesn't even need to mention him again, as none of their films in the coming few years involve him in any way.

Meanwhile, let's take a moment to lament the loss. We finally got to see two real Spider-Man films, which were both magnificent films that transcended the super-hero genre, and brought the characters from the comics to life in a way we'd never before seen. Moreover, we were poised for a third film that would likely have integrated Daredevil into the MCU when Peter brought Matt Murdock in as his attorney, and likely his team-up partner against the Sinister Six. So let's take a moment to imagine Spider-Man and Daredevil teaming up to battle the Vulture, Mysterio, the Scorpion, Shocker, and most likely Kraven and the Chameleon.

Lastly, I read Sony is willing to sell Spider-Man back to Marvel for $10 billion. That seems pretty high, but can probably be negotiated down a bit. Let's hope Marvel and Sony work out a price and Marvel pays it, so we don't have to postulate how Sony will introduce Spider-man into their "universe," (and I use that term lightly because it's been but one film, and a lousy one at that) before ruining the character for a third time.

reply

Get rid of Holland and get an older Spiderman, 27 or 28, with a graduate degree in physics and a cool job, being the Marvel version of Batman except for having superstrength and not a billionaire, a standalone vigilante misunderstood hero who saves the city over and over again but is looked upon with suspicion by law enforcement and the Establishment.

reply