MovieChat Forums > I Am Mother (2019) Discussion > The daughter became the mother (story ex...

The daughter became the mother (story explained)


The story is like this:

1: AI annihilated all humans to protect humans from themselves.

2: AI begins to rebuild Earth and make new, and better humans to populate it later.

3: AI makes a plan to create a first Mother to complete that task.

4: This plan includes creating the Daughter we see (and we learn of failed attempts before her).

5: To properly educate her, AI creates a Woman to come knocking on the door forcing human interactions, learning human inabilities, human challenges, etc. And ultimately ingraining a sense of motherhood and connection to the cause of repopulating Earth.

6: When Daughter finally takes her brother with the aim of raising him herself, she passed her final test and AI concludes it had created a better human and a better mother.


In the end:

* Daughter had become Mother.

* Woman had served the purpose and was erased.

* AI is still lurking and making sure it all happens concordantly.

dot dot dot

reply

You literally copied this from another thread.

reply

Nope, it is all me. But I posted this on other places...

But of course, I am curious if someone else worded it similar to me. If so, could you provide a link?

reply

This needed an explanation?

reply

Quite a few ask what the ending meant, so yes. It would seem so.

reply

Having now had a look around, I guess so. Oh dear.

reply

This does seem like the most logical explanation of the ending/movie. I just wonder about the memory of the woman having about the mines and the other survivors that started to go crazy(she hinted at cannibalism).

reply

We know the woman lied. The question is about how much?

It think her existence comes from this:

AI realizes it needs human contact in its test to create the perfect Mother. It creates a person (we know it can increase growth/biological development of babies) and implant memories in her, and keep her at bay by the beach. Providing her with minimal survival stuff, a dog for company and when the timing is right, make her "seek refuge" and have it play out.

This has merits for the following reasons:

* She looks eerily similar to Daughter - hardly a coincidence by the scriptwriters. Almost as though they share genetic material (perhaps a failed daughter, with erased memory)

* The names Woman mention comes from the same Bible story. It was not merely names from the bible, it was from the same bible tale. Like she just read a story and then used this as her "friends"... something fishy about that. The camera focuses twice at least on her crucifix (made from cotton, it seemed), which leads me to think it has significance. I do not believe it did this to show human still have faith (not really relevant here). It did this to show some deeper meaning in light of the story being told... when she mentions people who happen to have names from the same bible tale, and we see she holds a crucifix ... I think it is filmed/told like this to show us she is making stuff up.

* Woman is gifted at drawing. Daughter is gifted at Origami... are the scriptwriters hinting that "Daughters" have creative abilities? They make a point out of both these abilities. Daughter origami things she has never experienced. Woman draws people she had never met. Also, Daughter leaves an Origami dog as their final communication. It was the first time, she had experienced one...

* Ending monologue (from Mother) says Woman can't remember her mother (how would Mother know this? and why to emphasize this in the last spoken line of the movie).

She was part of the training, and so, logically, she had to be fostered in a way that suited this plane. It seems too big a risk having a stranger come knocking, I feel.

IDK. Having Woman be a complete fabrication, just seems more ingenious and sinister. I think there hints supporting a bigger connection. Besides, was she just a survivor, I find Mother's opening sentence in her final monologue misleading to this fact...and I suppose, I just like more the version, where Woman is a fabrication as well. :)

reply

I agree with others that this is so obvious it didn't require an explanation just to bolster HAL 9010's ego, and that HAL 9010 copied the ideas if not the words from others.

reply

You are the second one who says this... why would you say I just copied it?

I know it is all me, so dare I say someone else copied me?

(although the idea or outline is indeed copied... as it is the movie)

reply

Dare not. It's easy to see that the other posts were earlier than yours. Admit it and move on. You got the idea from someone else, which wasn't hard to do because your points are as obvious as the nose on your face. Sorry to deflate your ego.

reply

I admit it; I got the idea from watching the movie. I also admit it is obvious, as it is all in the movie. And on top of this, I also admit that reading discussing threads inspire... and when I made this one, several were discussing what was obvious or not about the tale, which is why I made this post, in my own way... you see, I enjoy discussion threads like this. And so, sure why not.

I have the same post on TMDB which fueled a good amount of interesting discussion there.

But, I cannot see why you would get ruffled about any of that... show me this ”post” that I so obviously copied (because I agree, that wouldn't be cool)... my guess is; you can't.... .... and reading how your other comments in here are, makes this guess kind of obvious, wouldn't you admit?

reply