Bad


Extremely dated animation, bad writing, and so far with ep1, really bad story.

I could see Doctor Who superfans maybe getting something out of this, but the rest of us are going to be turned off by it.

reply

It's from 1966 did you expect it to be in line with the modern show?

reply

This doesn't change the fact that it's not worth wasting time on.

reply

Neither is the board for it.

reply

The animation is the only new thing. The soundtrack and dialogue are from 1966, because that is all that they could recover. So they took the original shot-for-shot (what they could recover), and animated it into a horrible washed out silvery cartoon.

reply

It's not actually Shot for shot.
Most of it has been reframed to limit the animation and get the thing finished on time and on budget, the old trick of people bobbing along from the waste up rather than animating a wide shot for example.

I'd like to know what the budget was before i criticize too much, They said it was less per episode than the Dad's army soundtrack they also animated.
I know the Budget for the animated episodes of the invasion was originally put aside for the doctor who website budget, which would have been a tiny amount, a few thousand at the very most, so if it was £3000 for 6 episodes the cheapness is understandable.

reply

You have it ass backwards. If it was L3000 for 6 episodes, then they should not have done it. Basically they released a soundtrack to a story arc and they might as well have filmed puppies running around. It is unwatchable, so the only benefit is to listen to it as if it were on radio.

reply

You can buy the soundtrack on cd, you've been able to for years... NoBody is stopping you doing that.

You can also watch the fan telephoto reconstructions from the 90's legally for free. Mission to the unknown and Shada had money raised by fans to animate too, so you can find them for free.

You get the new telephoto reconstruction on the DVD too, if you'd rather watch with still photos.


I'm guessing You've seen the other animated reconstructions and knew what this was, there have been 6 done over they years through 2 entertain (The dvd People), but only BBC america is stupid enough to air something that was made to fill in episode gaps as a fully animated series.

I think BBC America are at fault here they've clearly aired something claiming it to be a fully animated thing when it's really not, it's more of a limited animation Storyboard.

The crusade is good as it gives you the missing episode Audio, with a photo or two AND / or a choice of having Ian Chesterton telling you what happens in the missing parts of the story, rather than animate the missing bits.

reply

It's not actually Shot for shot.
Most of it has been reframed to limit the animation and get the thing finished on time and on budget, the old trick of people bobbing along from the waste up rather than animating a wide shot for example.

I'd like to know what the budget was before i criticize too much, They said it was less per episode than the Dad's army soundtrack they also animated.
I know the Budget for the animated episodes of the invasion was originally put aside for the doctor who website budget, which would have been a tiny amount, a few thousand at the very most, so if it was £3000 for 6 episodes the cheapness is understandable.

Actually, The Invasion budget they inherited from the discontinued online 9th Doctor web series was rather sizable. The budget was for two full stories online with more time to each story than the two episodes of The Invasion that they animated. With money lost to five years of inflation it was still big. That is why the BBC decided to spend it, all that money just sitting there for Doctor Who doing nothing. The quality of the animation for The Invasion truly spoiled us, as the BBC can't afford that for the rest of these kind of projects. I wish they could afford it for Doctor Who though.

reply

I wish they could afford it for Doctor Who though.


Alas, even in it's 60's and 70's prime they were only bugeted £2500 per episode. Doctor who has always been on the short end of the BBc's money.

reply

Doctor who has always been on the short end of the BBc's money.

Well, it was Science Fiction, and the BBC heads for a long time didn't see ANY value in that genre. Sydney Newman had to pitch it by comparing it to H.G. Wells the Time Machine to get any traction. Heavily comparing it to a literary classic and saying all the young people dig science fiction these days was the only way to sell it. Thankfully that changed in the early 2000's when they got a change of programming heads and they were open to science fiction programs. Otherwise we might never have gotten Doctor Who to return to our screens.

They still don't fund the old Doctor Who(and often new Doctor Who) worth a d*@#.

reply

The animation is less well-made than the old and still-creepy works of British Flash animator David Firth.

"Socks" is so delightfully WTF.

reply