You need to watch the full interview Comfort did with Krauss. The fact that it appears Krauss is comparing DNA directly to snowflakes in the movie is partly because Comfort edits his films heavily and uses voice overs to make it seem like they are talking about one thing as opposed to another.
In the full interview with Kruass its easy to see that they are talking purely about "apparent complexity in nature". This is why Krauss brings up the snowflake. To say "dont be fooled by what looks complex in nature". In the movie Comfort does he even adds a little voice over at the end saying "well thats nice but that does not explain the information stored in DNA".... well..... duh because that is not what you actually asked Krauss about. You asked him about COMPLEXITY not information. Its like if i asked you to describe why an apple is red and then went "aha! But that does not explain the taste!" since we are talking about two different things here. You can also see in the full interview Krauss DOES mention (briefly since it was not the topic of their conversation) the origins of DNA. However Ray saw fit to edit this part out for his own movie since discussing the origins of DNA would disprove his entire argument that DNA just arose fully functioning. Ray normally says he makes this edits "for time" but that can not be the case here, since Krauss literally only takes a few seconds to mention the origins of DNA.
NEVER take anything Ray presents as the full truth. Remember this is the guy who thought human altered bananas were proof of god.
reply
share