Why low rating ?
I think it was enjoyable.Why did low rating ? 4/10 really! I think it should be 6/10.
sharethe rating was a suprise... I gave it a 7. Cage was awesome as usual.
(SSDD)
MovieChat Forums > Arsenal (2017) Discussion > Why low rating ?
Agree, this movie was a fun ride, and it knows what it is. Expected 5.5 for sth like this. Voted it a 7, but 4 def seems low.
shareDefinitely agree with you. Was this movie flawed??
Absolutely.
How was Cusack so close to them? Why didn't ANYONE have a Southern accent?? How'd Entourage dude become such an assassin???
Either way, it was a fun ride. 7/10 for sheer entertainment value.
Well, I haven't seen the movie yet, it's on my list , but about the rating thing , the movie still showing and the rating haven't finished yet , give it some time .
shareMy guess is because it sucks moose cock. 2/10
shareif you are A fan of Cage and Cusack like me and have time to kill then you can watch it,they are great in this mediocre film.
Ask the guards, they'll deny it. Ask the inmates here—they'll cut their tongues out before they talk
because its Arsenal everyone know Arsenal = 4
shareI felt that my time was wasted just for watching this. I would never watch this if there are not Cage and Cusack.
This is pure garbage. Cusack and Cage are both terrible in this but not worse than Grenier that is laughable!
Next movie they should add DeNiro to the mix and blow them all up.
I give this worthless pile of garbage a 2.
Perfect example of how badly made this movie is how Grenier drives at 43:41 into the movie, ridiculous!
I started watching this after watching the 3 stooges and I forgot that this wasn't a comedy...
Watch any of the movies in the top 250 movies of IMDB instead!!!