MovieChat Forums > Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe (2017) Discussion > Why Our Children Should Hate Us - By Lan...

Why Our Children Should Hate Us - By Lance Simmens


Here is the VAXXED review written by veteran journalist Lance Simmons, that Huffington Post CENSORED without explanation:


Why Our Children Should Hate Us

Vaxxed, the controversial documentary alleging a direct causal relationship between vaccines and exponential increases in autism amongst children is a deeply disturbing and hence critically important piece of work that will cause many sleepless nights for parents of infants everywhere.

I had the honor of both watching the film and participating in a discussion afterwards with its Producer, Del Bigtree and Director, Dr. Andrew Wakefield. It is a must see film and deserves to serve as a catalyst for a national discussion of the role of mandatory vaccines for children and the role of the pharmaceutical industry in government decision-making.

Vaxxed represents another in a cascade of documented allegations calling to task not only the corruption of government regulatory agencies but the corruption of science and scientific method itself.

What is equally disturbing, however, is that the film represents another in a cascade of documented allegations calling to task not only the corruption of government regulatory agencies but the corruption of science and scientific method itself. And to the extent that the current Presidential election contest has sparked virulent dissatisfaction with our elected leadership and the institutions of government, we must take this opportunity to seriously question what many had taken for granted: namely, that government has as its most solemn mission the protection of public health, safety and welfare.

The film carefully documents decisions by the Centers for Disease Control that lend credence to systemic corruption.

As a father of two millennials, I have been bombarded with what has turned out to be a warranted cynicism, criticism, and rejection of government. As one who devoted nearly 40 years to the promotion of public service and government, I have come to reassess my initial reluctance to such criticisms. The kids have every right to be cynical and critical and as hard as it is for parents to accept it, probably know more than we do.

The corruption of science and scientific method has manifested itself most prominently in recent years with a spate of attempts to deny the existence of global climate change and the role that continued fossil fuel usage plays in accelerating it.


This, of course, finds refuge in the stalling tactical maneuvers perfected by the tobacco industry over a half century ago. These “Merchants of Doubt” cast an effective smoke screen that effectively blurs rational thought by an unsuspecting public that would much rather leave it to the experts. And the experts on protecting the public are those we elect to steer the ship of state.

Vaxxed has opened at Pasadena’s Laemmle’s Playhouse and Santa Monica’s Laemmle Monica Film Center.

Pasadena’s Laemmle’s Playhouse and Santa Monica’s Laemmle Monica Film Center.

But of late we have seen spineless political chicanery, which I must sadly admit is totally bipartisan, when it comes to issues like fracking and the substitution of natural gas as a purportedly transitional fuel to bridge the gap between coal and renewables. What, in essence, we are doing is substituting one form of greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide with its long-term atmospheric consequences, with a far more potent heat-trapping gas, methane, in the short- and intermediate-term. This is fossil foolishness that will sentence our kids and grandkids to a lifetime of gut-wrenching and maybe irretrievably lesser quality-of-life choices. But the effects will not show up until after those making the decisions have long left their lofty perches within the government.

Fracking is contaminating water supplies and the air we breathe, is causing public health problems and facilitating earthquakes in places that have never even had earthquakes in recorded history, yet the regulatory responses are negligible. While New York State maintains a moratorium on fracking its neighbor Pennsylvania continues to put communities at risk. California—with its tough-talking Governor Jerry Brown loudly decrying climate change and promising to be a world leader on mitigation strategies—is essentially missing in action when it comes to regulating fracking in the Central Valley and even within the city limits of Los Angeles. The inadequacy of California’s regulatory body to place the citizens’ health and safety above industry considerations borders on criminal.

We all witnessed the BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, and its dastardly cousin in Porter Ranch, California, that has been described as BP on land, the release of nearly 100,000 metric tons of methane from a leaking natural gas storage well. Yet we merrily proceed to push forward with government-subsidized fossil fuel production policies that benefit the richest corporations known to mankind.

We see government failure and most likely criminal negligence if not outright prosecutable actions on behalf of government officials with regard to the contaminated drinking water in cities like Flint, Michigan, and evidently in cities all across the U.S.

There are crimes against humanity being perpetrated by chemical companies like Monsanto as glyphosates and genetically engineered foods find their ways comfortably into our kitchens and stomachs. Steven Druker, in his seminal book Altered Genes, Twisted Truth has meticulously documented systemic corruption in the Food and Drug Administration.

In Malibu, there is a local effort to address the existence of PCB’s in window caulking in schools yet the school board spends millions of dollars to fight its removal rather than simply remove it. Once again it seems to be far easier to spend money denying the evidence than in fixing the problem. This is obscene and unfortunately the problem extends to schools throughout the country. Why is it we have so little regard for the injuries we are inflicting upon our children?

Last but not least we are witnessing a monumental failure on the part of the Fourth Estate, the media. Bowing to the pressures of deep-pocketed advertisers, the media refuses to even make an attempt at investigative journalism.

A glaring exception to this is the case of the Spotlight investigative team at the Boston Globe, which uncovered massive corruption within the Catholic Archdiocese in sheltering child molesters and pedophiles among the priesthood.

We celebrate this as an act of great valor, when in essence it ought to be business as usual. This should not be the exception; it should be the norm and the media is abdicating its responsibility to expose the truth and instead prefers the safer course which is to be complicit in the cover-up. Richard Dreyfuss and I recently penned an article calling attention to this complicity here.

I have worked in numerous governmental agencies at senior levels where I attempted to defer to the scientific expertise when contemplating major policy decisions affecting millions of people. To see the systemic corruption that is occurring in government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services including the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration not only makes me sad but it makes me mad.

There has always been an attempt in this nation to balance out the avarice of the private sector with a regulatory framework in the public sector that protects those most vulnerable in society.

That balance has been totally upended and as the latest effort on behalf of those involved in Vaxxed shows, we as a society can no longer depend upon our government leaders and institutions to protect us.

We must begin by electing leaders who will restore the balance that is needed to protect at the very least our children. If we do not our legacy to our children will be one punctuated by scorn and anger. In this instance our kids actually know us better than we know ourselves. What a sad commentary on the state of affairs of the human race.

Lance Simmens



BIO: Lance Simmens has spent nearly four decades involved in public service at all levels of government: Federal, State and local. In the process he has devoted his professional career to a search for the most effective and efficient public policies, programs, and processes to benefit the society at large. He most recently served as the California State Director for Gasland Grassroots, an organization devoted to public education on the issue of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and promotion of the current HBO documentary Gasland 2, and was California State Director for the Citizens Trade Campaign, organizing efforts to defeat the Trans Pacific Partnership.

He served CA Governor Jerry Brown as Deputy Director of Communications for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, the largest public works program in the history of the U.S. In this position he helped to steer the program forward with a business plan that has largely been hailed as realistic during a most difficult economic period. In addition he served as the chief spokesman for the project, doing innumerable interviews, both on and off camera, oversaw placement of opinion-editorials in all major newspapers in the State, and appeared in dozens of public for a to advance this visionary transportation option for future generations.

Mr. Simmens has spent fifteen years in Federal service, largely serving in senior intergovernmental affairs positions for four Cabinet Secretaries, six years as Assistant Executive Director of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, where he staffed the powerful Urban Economic Policy Committee charged with setting national economic and budgetary priorities for the nation's largest cities, six years as Senior Economic Counsel to U.S. Senator James Sasser on the U.S. Senate Budget Committee, and for nearly eight years served Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell as Special Assistant for Intergovernmental Affairs.


In this capacity he received the most distinguished non-member awards for public service by the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors, and is the only person to have ever received the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities' Public Service Citation twice. He also served as the Chairman of the Governor's panels on development of both wind and solar energy and engineered groundbreaking model ordinances that have been emulated nationwide.

In 1999 Mr. Simmens served as senior advisor on the President's Council on Y2K Conversion and was responsible for preparation and publication of a government-wide Scenario Policy document on the issue at a Cabinet-level meeting held at Blair House that Fall.

In 1993 Mr. Simmens was appointed by President Clinton to help establish the Federal government's first Office of Sustainable Development in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the U.S. Department of Commerce. Over the next four years he was instrumental in developing and implementing programs, policies and regulations for sustainable fisheries that would earn him the highest award from the Department of Commerce, the Gold Medal Award, as leader of a team of government officials who pioneered sustainable initiatives off the coast of New England, the Pacific Northwest, and the Gulf of Mexico.

As Assistant Executive Director of the U.S. Conference of Mayors from 1987-1993 he was responsible for economic and budgetary resolutions and policies on key issues facing urban America, including NAFTA, the Census undercount, targeted fiscal assistance, and reordering Federal budget priorities to capture the "peace dividend" afforded by the end of the Cold War. In 1991 he led a delegation of Mayors to Moscow to participate in a conference on Federalism to help with the transition of government under the collapse of the Soviet Union. In 1992 he organized an historic meeting of Russian and American Mayors at the United Nations where they heard testimony from major world leaders including Carl Sagan.

During the 1980's Mr. Simmens served as Legislative Director for U.S. Senator James Sasser and his Senior Economic Counsel on the U.S. Senate Budget Committee. He directed his energies to fighting to preserve domestic discretionary spending against the ravages of the Reagan supply-side spending cuts. He played a major role in preserving the Railroad Retirement System, school lunch funding, education funding, and Community Development Block Grants and the Social Security Disability program from further cuts. He drafted legislation, offered by Senators Sasser and Moynihan to stave off elimination of the General Revenue Sharing program that was eventually unsuccessful.

Over the years he has written extensively, drafting statements for the Congressional Record and Committee publications, op-ed articles, and speeches. He has published over 200 articles under his own name. Over the past three years he has published nearly 90 articles in Huffington Post. He has co-authored an article for the Loyola Entertainment Law Review and is regularly quoted in newspapers and magazines. In his career he has published over 300 articles in journals, newspapers, and magazines.

In 2006 he was chosen by former Vice-President Al Gore to be one of the first class of individuals to be trained to deliver presentations on the implications of climate change. As a climate change messenger he has delivered over 100 presentations worldwide during that time, including an invitation to present at the London School of Economics.

He has a Master's degree in Public Administration from Temple University and completed courses for a doctorate from George Washington University, served as an Executive for five years at the Iacocca Institute at Lehigh University, has taught public policy at Santa Monica College, and completed Executive programs at the John F. Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Institute for International Development at Harvard University and the U.S. Army War College.

In his spare time he is a voracious reader and he has written a screenplay, a novel, which is expected to be published soon that touches on the perils of drilling for natural gas, a book of political and personal stories, has appeared in several political documentaries including 14 Women, Electile Dysfunction, and Gasland 2.

He is the author of "The Evolution of a Revolution".

He is the father of two boys, Christopher, 22 and Nicholas, 20 and resides in Santa Monica, CA.


reply

Vaxxed, the controversial documentary alleging a direct causal relationship between vaccines and exponential increases in autism amongst children


Actually:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25108395

Baxter AJ, Brugha TS, Erskine HE, Scheurer RW, Vos T, Scott JG. The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2015 Feb;45(3):601-13

The conclusion is that over the last two decades, while diagnoses of autism are increasing, these are consistent with a combined increase in awareness, combined with a broadening of the diagnostic criteria.

In other words, there are very good reasons to believe that the increase in rates of ASD may not actually exist.

--Drew

reply

The conclusion is that over the last two decades, while diagnoses of autism are increasing, these are consistent with a combined increase in awareness, combined with a broadening of the diagnostic criteria.


In other words, there are very good reasons to believe that the increase in rates of ASD may not actually exist.

Sorry....This just don't make no sense.

You contradict yourself.

reply

Sorry....This just don't make no sense.


It does if you realize that diagnoses and actual prevalence are very different and, at best, weakly-related quantities. Prevalence is the number of people who actually have a given condition. Diagnosis is the subset of that population that are actually found. The latter quantity, unlike the former, is dramatically impacted by factors that are completely unrelated to the condition itself. For instance, awareness of the condition: if you have a condition, but you go to a doctor who is unfamiliar with it, you're unlikely to be diagnosed. Diagnostic criteria also change over time. If diagnostic criteria change, the number of people who are diagnosed will change with it. The impact of changes in diagnostic criteria is not without precedent, incidentally: after new diagnostic tests were developed for prostate cancer, there appeared to be a sudden increase in the number of people who had it. There was no sudden epidemic of prostate cancer in that case. The same number of people had prostate cancer before as after, it's just that a larger fraction of that population was actually being found.

It appears that a similar effect is at play with autism. Autism, as a condition, is now better understood, and more readily diagnosed (actually, the case could be made that it's somewhat prone to overdiagnosis). On top of that, the diagnostic criteria for autism were significantly broadened in the 90s, resulting, surprisingly enough, in more children landing on the spectrum. The findings of this paper are that rather than actually having more children who are actually autistic, we are diagnosing a larger fraction of those that do.

All this was laid out quite clearly in the paper I cited, so I'm actually surprised that you missed it the first time you read it. Perhaps you should read it again, more carefully this time. They summarized their results thus:

After adjusting for variable study methodology, our models show that the prevalence of ASDs seems to have remained relatively stable over the past 20 years. A community case-finding survey of adults by Brugha et al. (2011) found that prevalence of ASDs in younger cohorts was consistent with that of older adult cohorts, supporting our finding of a stable prevalence. These results support research findings (Fombonne, 2008) that suggest that early childhood factors, for instance vaccinations, have had no observable effect on the occurrence of ASDs.


Note: not "increasing" and certainly not the "exponential increase" described in the OP. They describe an actual incidence of autism that is relatively static.

In their discussion, they also included the following:

It may be that methodological differences, particularly more inclusive diagnostic criteria and more comprehensive sampling methodologies, are responsible for the increased identification of cases (Wing & Potter, 2002; Wazana et al. 2007). Our models showed that more recent diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV and ICD-10) identified a greater number of cases compared with earlier criteria. This is not surprising in view of the addition of Asperger’s disorder to DSM-IV and the broader definition of autistic disorder, which led to children previously being diagnosed with mental retardation being reclassified under an autistic disorder (Croen et al. 2002; King & Bearman, 2009).


In other words, if you create a more inclusive definition of what it means to be autistic, you can hardly act surprised when more people meet that definition. Further, it's hard to argue that the vaccine schedule is resulting in an increase in incidence of autism when, in reality, there are very good reasons to believe that there is no such increase.

Oh, and before you ask: no. Not one of the authors works, or ever has worked for any company that develops, manufactures, or distributes vaccines. This isn't terribly surprising, as the paper has practically nothing to do with vaccines directly. It is primarily addressing the incidence of autism worldwide.

--Drew

reply

we are witnessing a monumental failure on the part of the Fourth Estate, the media. Bowing to the pressures of deep-pocketed advertisers, the media refuses to even make an attempt at investigative journalism.


Stellar review - thanks.

reply

Bowing to the pressures of deep-pocketed advertisers, the media refuses to even make an attempt at investigative journalism.


Yes, at least in the USA and Canada. The media in Europe is a bit more forthcoming and people are in a valid uproar. When the media colludes to keep their citizens from being aware of what is really going on, it creates the illusion that everything is okay. In spite of this, people do eventually find out the truth and that backlash is becoming even greater against the media and those put into positions of authority. This is why you'll see more propaganda than ever promoting vaccination and since that isn't working and many wise people are refusing these shots, then the government steps in tries to force it upon us.

reply