They say there is no such thing as bad publicity. I can see a charity wanting to be on the show if there is a second season (and that is a BIG if) despite all the bad press this show has gotten. But after what LeeAnne has done on camera this season?! I can't see who would want people to think "LeeAnne Locken" when they think about their charity.
Thoughts?
BOOM! bazooka joe. -Randy Barry of The Real World: San Diego
If I owned a charity organisation, I wouldn't want to associate it with that woman. Besides, what sort of charity was that Mad Hatter event for? Who does these kind of charities? High Society charities disgust me, the whole idea of it, the hypocrisy.
shareAnd who would pay $1000 to hear her talk?
I thought the same thing and started another thread. I couldn't believe she didn't change her act for the reunion. Figured her charities would have sat her down and told her to tone things down if she wanted to stay the face of their organizations.
The charities that these ladies are involved in are examples of fake activities to give them something to do, to give them somewhere to wear their expensive clothing and to have a sense of self congratulation. They rationalize all their hedonism and narcissism with "see, we raised $10,000 for charity!".
Often, the ladies in this milieu spend more time and money on clothes, hats,jewels and venues than they actually raise for the charities.