However, you just had to get insulting. It's not surprising... that's a very conservative thing to do, and VERY Trump.
so it's a pity, HerrSupahz, that you then had to respond with your own tirade of insulting language. "Trumpalumpas" ...such a creative neologism. BTW, who exactly is a "conservative". Presumably, you're referring to right-wingers? Some of the most conservative people I've met were lefties. They had been left-wingers since their youth and they were so inflexible and dogmatic in their political and social views. They had some of the same religious zeal and closed-mindedness often ascribed to religious fundamentalists. Trump, in a very real sense, is the progressive. He's seeking to usher in change. Clinton, on the other hand, is offering more of the same...no change. Obama promised change..."change we can believe in", he said. Yeah, right. I think what he really mean't to say was "change I believe my Wall Street donors we permit me to offer"
So, can we assume, HerrSupahz, that you're satisfied with the current status quo and don't want to see any change? Do you want more of the same?? I agree that Trump is a risk. But revolutionary actions are so disruptive they sometimes bring unintended consequences. A case of "you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs".
Anyway, let's agree on one thing: what "The Art of the Deal" says loud-and-clear is that HOLLYWOOD is solidly anti-Trump. Yes, Fox News is pro-Trump. Difference is Hollywood has a global reach far greater than the Fox News. Anyone who disagrees with the Hollywood-line on anything is ridiculed. It *is* propaganda. Merriam-Webster defines propaganda as "ideas or statements that are often false or exaggerated and that are spread in order to help a political cause or leader.QED!
reply
share