The problem is unfortunately deeper than that. Up until 2005, for almost 4 decades, America was a partner in the Vienna Accords on Consular Relations.
This states, that when a foreigner is arrested in a country, and charged with a crime, authorities are automatically obligated to inform their respective embassy or consulate the second the suspect is arraigned. It also says, that the second they're arrested, they enjoy the protection of the constitution of the country they were arrested in, and the one they're coming from. It states further, that an arrest cannot happen, or isn't lawful, if the crime isn't a crime in the country they're coming from. For example, public drunkenness might be, but private drinking isn't. When it comes to capitol offense, like murder, it states the highest punishment cannot be lethal, if either countries don't have a death penalty.
While most foreigners executed in America were Latin American Hispanics, and guilt was established, the corruption happened by informing their consulates after they were executed. This isn't a problem anymore. Ever since they stepped out of the accord, they can convict and execute anyone they like, at times based on an eyewitness testimony. The problem with that is glaring, and came to a head when that frat boy was convicted in North Korea, it means nobody else has to cooperate either.
As for adequately dealing... if it existed in a fictional drama it did, the real one is far from it. Judges run for reelection based on conviction rate, as do district attorneys, so mandatory minimum and private prisons were gift wrapped to supply bias. On the other hand, overcrowding leads to early releases or suspended sentences, and public defenders have 7 minutes for a client. Dostoevsky said, you can measure how civilized a country is by the number of convicts they hold, and currently the American prison system has more, than China. To be fair, China has 65 different capitol offenses that warrant the death penalty, including selling rotten produce, but that doesn't give a free pass. An additional problem, referenced in the show is the status of the mentally ill and challenged people. If prisons could run ads, it would say: "Your state cut funding for halfway houses and mental health clinics? Do you suffer from the burden of not having time and skills required for your relatives? At a 24/7 facility we can provide accommodation for these people, even if they can't understand why they are in, and can't leave. To combat frustration and violent outbursts, our specialists in riot gear will calm them down, and put them away in solitary confinement". Unfortunately that's happening, including tazing mentally ill patients despite manufacturer warning to never use it on them.
Based on these things, I'm not at all surprised, that they don't care who they execute. The horrible criminals are the ones, who are incapable of remorse, and toy with the emotions of survivors. Executing them is actually doing a favor, as that enshrines them in the eyes of their followers. Christopher Harper-Mercer committed suicide after he killed people, he was a white supremacist, a misogynist, and antisocial, and he frequented a board, where the users called Elliott Rodger a saint for what he did on all men's behalf in Santa Barbara. Execution, suicide or suicide by cop only emboldens them, and creates more problems, than it solves.
I live in the Gordius Apartment Complex, my interior designer was M.C. Escher.
reply
share