Of the four experiments, one man did not go through with the push. The other man did, but only after a lot of second-guessing and doubt.
The women... no problem. A quick wipe of the face then straight over and push. Especially, that second woman... didn't hesitate or slow her pace down at all.
So are women just one step away from being stone-cold killers? Or are they so weak-willed they can be easily swayed?
You decide...
Your thinking has some serious flaws. Two women out of 200 million women in the English speaking world is not even close to a representative sample. If Brown repeated this with 100 women and 100 men and got dramatically different results for men and women, we might have something to discuss. But your reasoning is hogwash, not to mention sexist (and I'm a male by the way).
share[deleted]
LOL... based on your inability to defend your arguments, I'm pretty sure you have the intelligence of a little girl (very little girl).
shareYou're right: the sample size is too small. But I don't think it's a bad guess that women are more likely to join a group and men are more likely - in general - to rebel. That could be a good trait (as here) or a bad one, depending on the context.
share