Painful to Watch


I don’t think this documentary is painful to watch because it was poorly made, or because I think Anthony Weiner is bad person or politician. I’m just not interested in his personal life. I would rather watch a documentary about politicians like Rob Ford or Silvio Berlusconi. Weiner’s sexual activities are boring when you compare them to the activities of some other well known politicians. I also think the documentary was painful to watch because it highlights one of the many things that I think it wrong with the American political system, and the average American’s perception of sexuality and marriage.

It would have been an interesting documentary to watch if Weiner decided to deviate from the normal American political rules and customs during his mayoral campaign, and run on a platform of brutal honesty. The type of honesty that many Americans don’t want to see or hear. The type of honesty that destroys cultural fallacies and illusions. He could have focused on important political issues, while refusing to apologize for his private sexual activities. And he could have let the public know that as long as he’s not breaking the law, anything that he does in his private life is none of our business.

Anthony Weiner isn’t a social conservative, so a campaign of honesty without shame wouldn’t have made him look like a liar or a hypocrite. An honest and flawed politician winning a mayoral race in NYC would have been a long shot, but at least he would have had a chance. And even if he didn’t win, at least he could have played an important role in the process of slowly changing the way the American public thinks about the private lives of politicians and other people in the spotlight. But that’s not what he did. Instead he chose to continue his risky sexual activities, and he bowed his head in shame when he was caught for a second time.

I think Weiner’s actions were stupid, but I don’t think he did anything that I would consider morally wrong. I’m not a woman that agreed to be in a traditional monogamous relationship with the man, so from my perspective it’s none of my business. Some people believe that Weiner’s actions proves that he has some kind of mental illness. If anything, I think it’s American society that has what I would describe as a social illness.

We embrace systems that are built on lies and half-truths. And then we get upset when the lies are exposed. Most of us foolishly expect our politicians to be perfect citizens with a set of customs and values that are definitely not in alignment with our biology. Any politician that breaks the illusion of traditional family values is usually perceived as bad. And most of us believe that they have the right to tell other people how they should and shouldn’t experience pleasure or happiness.

I have a “whatever works” philosophy when I’m thinking about pleasure or happiness. As long as you’re not causing any involuntary physical harm to someone in the process, then I don’t care how you get from point A to point B. I want my politicians and anyone else that’s working for me to be happy, because happiness is associated with better productivity. And it’s obvious that Anthony found a thrilling activity that makes him happy in the moment.

reply

Ms. Abedin' reactions make it clear that she was working hard to give him another chance. Whether that was out of genuine love for him, for the sake of their child, or for cynical reasons like political expedience, it doesn't really matter. She made the effort, and he repeatedly betrayed her, entirely on their own terms. Forget societal conventions; that thing he said, to her, he was through with, well, he did it again.

Oh, and he just did it again, again.

reply

This marriage was like the Clinton's. At least she had the balls to leave him!

reply

The Clintons basically introduced them and arranged their marriage. Classic.

reply

I think at this point, for me, the problem I have with Weiner is the dishonesty, both to his wife and the public. The first time this happened, again, for me, it was a blip on the radar and nothing more. The second time, when he promised that he wouldn't do it again to Huma and the public, I took that as a statement of honesty. He laid it all out that he was a flawed human being as we all are.

Now, with the third time, and with his son in the bed next to him while he was sexting, I'm having a real issue with his behavior. Huma leaving him is a good thing. He has said over and over that he would behave and he hasn't. It appears, if my math is correct, that he was in the midst of this while the Weiner documentary was being made.

It IS actually none of our business, however, Weiner made it our business. He's not running for anything and probably will never run for anything again, but he is a public figure. He found a thrilling activity that made him happy in the moment, and has also cost him a lot. It certainly messed with his productivity. Before this he was a great congressman and probably would have been a great mayor. Now, because of what seems clear is addictive behavior, he's toast. He's lost his wife (probably), his son (except for visitation), and the respect of a lot of people.

I also have a "whatever works" philosophy, but when one chooses to become a public figure, you have to appeal to as many people as you can. This doesn't seem to be possible for Weiner.




reply

I agree with everything that you wrote. I couldn’t care less about Anthony Weiner's sexual activities, but I wouldn’t want him to be the mayor of my city. It’s not even his dishonesty that I have a problem with, because dishonesty has always been a fundamental part of politics. I call it political linguistics. And I always expect some amount of dishonesty from my politicians. I just don’t respect him as a person. I don’t have a problem with the idea of a married man using porn, webcams, or telecommunications to satisfy his sexual desires. But I do have a problem with elected officials that are general perceived as stupid and highly impulsive.

A smarter man might have been able to find a way to have his cake and eat it too. A mayoral campaign of complete honesty (and a little openness) would have been an interesting social experiment. Politics are all about math and perception. I think he would still have a political career If he showed no shame, combined with a little remorse for hurting his wife, and he managed to convince the public that he’s a good politician and his sexual activities are irrelevant. If he never had any intentions of stopping his sexual activities, then apologizing to the public was the first mistake that he made. Huma Abedin is the only person that should have received an apology. The public apology ended up making him look like a liar and a pervert.

Anyway, at this point I don’t think Anthony cares about his marriage or his public image anymore. The thrill of sexting with the possibility of being caught was obviously more important to him than politics or his marriage.

reply

I heard rave reviews for it so I gave it a try. I couldn't make it past the insane rant shown right at the beginning of the doc that presumably was to make the audience believe in his passion. It was obviously a performance.

reply

>> I would rather watch a documentary about politicians like Rob Ford<<

I think that would be far more painful.

reply

Rob Ford documentary would be badass

reply