MovieChat Forums > Holy Hell (2016) Discussion > Cult documentaries are all pretty much t...

Cult documentaries are all pretty much the same


They start off with attractive 20 something followers frolicking near-naked in the woods and cold lakes, with a charismatic spiritual guru/master, a "good guy" at first, who becomes increasingly erratic and needs to be increasingly worshipped. Those followers who can't pull themselves away become increasing ensnared in the guru's "spiritual energy" eventually engaging in something incredibly stupid or criminal. This cult wasn't as bad as some in that no one was murdered (unless you count all those abortions that this particular guru insisted on) although there was rape aplenty.

Anyway, as far as cult documentaries go I though this was a pretty good one because the movie maker had incredible access to the cult by being a devoted member himself for years, and who was allowed by the guru to shoot all this video. I guess where it falls short is there was no analysis by professionals - but that was minor for me, because I've already seen "analysis" of the cult phenomenon many times. Bottom line - young adults want to feel they belong and can lose a sense of identity real fast, especially surrounded by attractive like minded people. Worshipping a guru is far easier than living one's own life. And these gurus are good at what they do, which is to make people love, worship and fear them at the same time.

reply

Just saw it last night at The Austin Film Society....

I agree with most of what you said... but I still found it enthralling

reply

Very good analysis, ckanelevy

reply

Honor those who seek the truth.
Be wary of those who find it!

reply

ain't that the truth!

reply

Good analysis. But I think there's a streak of narcissism or mental illness in the people who get sucked into this, as well as in the leaders.
It's so hard for me to understand how people can fall for such nonsense or why they'd want to be such followers and/or need a group so badly.
Gross.

reply

Yes, this reminded me a lot of the documentary on the Source Family. But I'm fascinated by the phenomenon, and this doc is better than most, offering the members' perspective rather than being sensationalized from the outside.

Cult groups often offer some form of utopian escapism. Jim Jones' Peoples' Temple, for instance, was about racial harmony, and it appealed to a group of people who were looking to create a new and better society together. Heavens Gate was about leaving the corruption of the Earth behind for a new life in space. The Buddhafield was more about being part of a welcoming, accepting community helmed by a loving mentor who could introduce you to God -- hence many people who came from Catholic or fire-and-brimstone Protestant backgrounds.

I have felt the pull of a cult myself -- though I'm too critical/suspicious/emotionally-stable to actually join anything like that, I can see the appeal. In my case, the two cults I have experienced up-close seemed autonomous and self-sufficient. From the outside it seemed that if you joined, you wouldn't have to worry about "the world" anymore. You would spend your days living in a cozy group home, farming vegetables or doing other manual labor tasks, wearing their approved clothes, and not making any decisions on your own. In a way it could seem freeing to give a cult group total authority over your life.

You might be interested in this article: https://blog.longreads.com/2013/09/28/caught-up-in-the-cult-wars-confessions-of-a-new/

Though I'm not an official cult-researcher like the writer, she captures part of why I find these groups so interesting to think about.

reply