MovieChat Forums > Brotherhood (2016) Discussion > Why all the Nudity.

Why all the Nudity.

posted 7 years ago by trunks78
2 replies | jump to latest

just found all the nude scenes completely irrelevant and unnecessary. I've trained a in boxing clubs, a jujitsu club and various gyms in London and never have I seen guys walking round mean mugging people in the changing room with their dicks hanging out. Why did those guys have the towels over their shoulder instead of round their waists??? Did I really need to see those dicks and Noel’s butt like the added anything to the scene. Also all those naked women just hanging out in the house. Not even with lingerie, just completely naked??

[–] SteverB 7 years ago

I think this series may have run out of "edgy" in the second movie so that was supposed to replace it? I have to agree with you on this one, the dicks were only a few seconds, but the female nudity in the house with EVERYTHING on display was just gratuitous and, like you said, completely unnecessary and irrelevant.

__________________________________________
"In your opinion?"
"Um, yes your honor, in my opinion."

[–] sea_goat 7 years ago

Completely agree. The female nudity was totally gratuitous, unnecessary and unrealistic. It made the film feel like a sexploitation flick of the '70s. When you see that stuff these days you know the film makers are not confident the quality of the material is strong enough to hold viewers' interest...

Add to this the fact there were next to no female characters, those it had were poorly drawn, and it is generally a film that exploits women, but has no female voice. How this film got made in the current film making climate - in which the way women are portrayed is coming under the spotlight - I'll never know.