About One Percent


One percent of prisoners are innocent of the crimes they are convicted of. Even after some of the innocent are proved to be innocent you have some ignorant District Attorneys who won't admit they are wrong. It's heartbreaking to the families that this has happened to. A lot of the people who are there to help the innocent don't get involved because they get treated like pariahs and just look the other way. It happens all the time and people don't believe it because the tv and radio make false reports and people don't think for themselves. Sad

reply

I can only imagine how horrifying it would be to be falsely accused, let alone convicted, of something I, or someone I loved, was innocent.

They say that once convicted, it's EXTREMELY difficult to get an appeal, or any benefit of doubt, in ways I understand this, but it assumes all was just and fair in the trial, which we know isn't always the case. On one hand we don't want violent or harmful people back out on the streets to harm other innocent people. On the other we don't want innocent people to lose any portions of their lives in prison for something the didn't do.

It's gotten more difficult, now that so many people accept that. Defense attorney's JOB is to get their clients off, regardless of guilt, and so few plead guilty anymore. Pleading innocent, even if the defendants and their attorneys KNOW it's a lie, has become the default, and is accepted as such.

In this case, not being privy to video of the entire cas, but having investigated it as best I could, including reading trial testimony and watching the videos that are available, as well as reports, after 5 months of sitting on the fence I finally concluded that SA was most likely guilty. This is far longer a time to deliberate than the jury had.

I'm still unsure about Brendan. I think he knew something and tried to cover for SA as best he could, probably his life was threatened by SAm and or his family's lives. Brendan once sai this, but then he said so many things, and we know some of them weren't true. Ultimately, I don't know about Brendan, but I also have a great deal of difficulty believing that on his own, without being coerced, he would rape, stab, and help cover up for a murder. I may be wrong, bu that's my feeling.

reply

The system is set up to reward convictions. They need to reward people for getting it right (even if their side loses).

I would like to see a system where if you put an innocent person away you are punished. However, I wouldn't trust this system to police itself. Would probably just lead to more cover ups.

Also a lot of people can't afford good lawyers. Many have to get a court appointed lawyer. Most of the time these public defenders are so backed up that they can't spent a lot of time on your case so they almost always recommend you taking a plea whether you are innocent or not. I'd be willing to be that a large amount of that 1% that are innocent are from plea deals from swamped court appointed lawyers. John Oliver did an excellent piece about this on his show.

reply

The system is set up to reward convictions.



And people get re-elected based on convictions. Because all communities want to believe they are as crime free and protected as possible.

Most of the time these public defenders are so backed up that they can't spent a lot of time on your case so they almost always recommend you taking a plea whether you are innocent or not


Absolutely. So much less trouble and time and expense than having to prepare for trial. Prosecutors know this, too, which is why they often agree to a much lighter sentence than if they go to trial. Their attitude is: "if you make me try this case and your client loses, he's going to do more time than if I don't have to go to all that trouble." They may actually say it! Locally, we once had, in those days, a County Attorney (later DA) who, rumor had it, never tried a case. He plea bargained everything. He was a smart lawyer but he didn't like the courtroom, apparently. Or was afraid it didn't like him. He was eventually voted out of office, and, again, according to rumor, that was the reason. People began to distrust all those plea bargains.

I bet you're right about the 1%.

reply

I recall right before O.J went on trial the news made a big deal about the prosecutions win and loss record. I don't recall how many wins they had but I do recall they had zero defeats. I recall The margin of win loss being reported was overwhelmingly one sided. It made me wonder why anyone would bother going to trial in L.A.

reply

It's actually closer to 5% of innocent convictions and anywhere from 10-20% where charge or charges were not all met.

As in, a person committed petty theft and gets hit with attempted murder.

Not to mention drug offences.

Frankly close to half of all incarcerated in America wouldn't be there at all or for far shorter period in Europe.

reply