MovieChat Forums > Ocean's Eight (2018) Discussion > Considered a bomb,yay or nay?

Considered a bomb,yay or nay?


πŸ‘πŸΌ

reply

Yay. Film has made about $79 mil over two weeks, about 50% of that goes to the studio. Since the budget was at least $70 mil (not including advertising), the film will need to make twice as much just to break even. As far as the studio is concerned, this is a bomb.

reply

lol they get way more than 50%-.

reply

Actually, no... in most cases the studio's get right around 50% of the domestic box office:
https://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-box-office-revenues-goes-to-the-makers-of-the-movie-When-a-movie-is-said-to-have-made-10M-in-the-box-office-how-much-of-that-goes-to-the-movie-makers

To quote from that site:
Typically, slightly more than half of all dollars sold in tickets goes to the studio/distributor for the first few weeks of its release. This percentage does lower over time. This is why production companies, studios and distributors obsessively "front load" a big budget movie to have massive openings. YES, they do want a movie to make money for as long as possible ("Avatar" made its bazillions over months of time). But the movies that cost tons of money ("Blockbusters") need a massive amount of ticket sales to justify their production.

There have been cases for some major blockbusters where the studios have forced theaters to accept a different percentage (see the issue with Disney and "The Last Jedi"):
https://mashable.com/2017/11/01/star-wars-last-jedi-theaters-disney/#0Ict4PddnOqa

However, for most cases, determining the studio take to be around 50% is fairly accurate.

reply

No, as long as makes 200m

reply

$175 is the break even. It might not get there.

reply

It's already at $175M

reply

Thats still not very good for a stellar cast.

reply

For a comedy, it's pretty good. Also, it hasn't even been released internationally in that many markets.

reply

I'm sure it will be called a modest hit. It only dropped 50% in it's second weekend which I think is on par for a movie like this. It was never going to have the strongest of legs, especially against Incredibles 2, but it's pleasant enough to not be a total failure like Ghostbusters.

Have a short review of this movie if anyone is interested- https://youtu.be/txnygPaREUE

reply

Hmm not a bomb but not exactly a hit either. I agree with darkpast if it finishes over 200 mil it’s done ok. But it also puts it in a position for diminishing returns if they try and do a sequel as the film from all indications is just an ok film.

reply

It's not a flop, but it surely won't revive the franchise with these profits. However there are still some big markets internationally O8 has to open yet, I'm sure the 37M figure listed at BOM will increase. Domestically this will probably limp to the 100M mark, all in all it's the weakest of the Ocean's franchise money-wise. Not a bomb but a failure yes. Studios nowadays are in for making franchises, that's the easy way out rather than making original movies it's more financially secure to make a sequel. Disney does the same thing but most of their releases are hits. Sure there are few duds here and there (Tomorrowland, A Wrinkle in Time, Solo, BFG among a few) but when the year is over usually they're on the top spot(s). Looking at this year WarnerBros tried with the Tomb Raider, that failed. RP1 was a moderate success but not a smashing hit, however a solid portion of the money was due to nostalgia and they can't play the same card twice. Rampage domestically not so big, if it wasn't for China that would've failed too. Only RP1 of all WB's releases this year managed to cross the 100M mark.

Besides the Harry Potter prequels and the questionable DC movies, does WB has any other franchise-worthy movies?

reply

WB is struggling, might explain why they still try to push the DC thing even though they only have one truly successful film and there is no guarantees that will repeat. Perhaps if they cut the budget to Tomb Raider 2 and keep the advertisement cheap it may be worth a go, but its domestic performance was sad and the international wasn't world shattering either. Rampage wasn't a good idea to begin with and a sequel would be Pacific Rim foolish. RP1 is simply too expensive to risk on just ok box office I would think.

reply

I don't think a sequel is in the cards. It is underperforming, but mostly I think we are seeing a lack of interest in reboots period, but there are exceptions to that too.

reply

Not at all. This isn't a superhero movie. There's no cars driving through exploding skyscrapers. It did just fine.

reply

Well if we were to compare it with the rest of the franchise then it's not doing fine. So far the weakest link in the chain was O13 and that earned 117M domestically and 311M WW. Unless it opens huge and I mean HUGE in the remaining foreign markets, O13's numbers will be unreachable for O8. Competition is stiff and there's nothing extraordinary about its holds to suggest it will be leggy enough to surpass any of the previous Ocean's titles.

reply

Very true, and this is unadjusted numbers you are comparing too. If you go to the comparison screen on BOM you can see how poorly it is performing compared to the others when you set it to 2018.

reply

Better to avoid those unadjusted numbers, instead just go with what a movie earned in its time and leave it at that :)

reply

This isn't Clooney and Pitt in their prime. This movie should have had Jolie leading.

reply

I don't think it would have made a difference. Its not the stars, its the lazy concept and film not being all that great to begin with (based on user and critic review) continuing a franchise whose last film's performance said it was time to end it.

reply

Not a bomb... it has sold well enough for a movie about a group of middle aged con women....

It was never expected to beat any of the previous Oceans movies... it doesn't have the Star power of Sinatra, Clooney, Pit, etc...

reply

Actors: Sandra Bullock
Cate Blanchett
Anne Hathaway
Rihanna
Helena Bonham Carter
Sarah Paulson
Awkwafina
Mindy Kaling
Dakota Fanning
Griffin Dunne
Elliott Gould
Richard Armitage


If Awkwafina cant put butts in the seats then I don't know what will.

reply

I know that these names are popular in the States, but outside of the US only Rihanna is a 'name' but for music... Bullock is recognisable, but nothing like Clooney or Pit, even today nevermind back during the Oceans movies release...

I don't know which actresses would have been as big names, maybe if Jennifer Lawrence, Scarlet Johannson and Angelina Jolie were included it would be as big...

reply

Not a bomb, but for a movie released when it was, with the cast that it has, it ain't great either.

reply

its officially a bomb...

reply

a disappointment, not a bomb, budget not too much

but compared to Ocean's Eleven 450m in 2001, it is

O8 may make 225m

there a reason why men are paid twice as much ;)

reply