Sex scenes? - King Cobra (2016) Discussion

James hopefully

reply

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

I think the sex scenes had BETTER be explicit or at least simulate being explicit. I wonder if the audience will see an anal sex scene which is important because this is a gay porn film. Will also be interesting to see if the closet case James Franco does any gay sex scenes?

reply

[–] UpperEastSider 8 years ago

Remember, this is a movie, not an actual porno. I'm sure there will be some nudity and sex scenes, however, I doubt they'll be graphic.

Hope changes everything.

reply

[–] Meldove 8 years ago

It will be as explicit as an R rating will allow.

reply

[–] stevenmorrisseyx 8 years ago

Well there BETTER be some simulated anal sex scenes. The audiences need to know yes gay men BANG! Brent Corrigan became famous for being a POWER BOTTOM! If this movie does NOT have any simulated scenes of Brent Corrigian getting banged then the movie failed.

reply

[–] I_Heart_CM 8 years ago

I don't know if it's a mistake, but IFC's site actually lists this movie as PG-13.
http://www.ifcfilms.com/films/king-cobra

And for the record, I never thought you were cool. I only thought you were a lesbian.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

Here is Clayton's comment on nudity from OUT magazine:

One of those choices: to have just a single ass shot in his contract — and (spoiler alert) King Cobra saves it for the end. Adorned with a temporary version of Corrigan’s star tattoo on one cheek, the actor approached the scene with his token casualness and a mind for longevity. “The makeup artist is painting my ass, and the AD is like, ‘We’re losing light!’ ” Clayton recalls with a laugh. “And I’m like, ‘This is gonna project about 40 feet high, and I’m gonna see it for the rest of my life. So let’s get it right.’”

reply

[–] stevenmorrisseyx 8 years ago

This is pathetic and disappointing I know the movie is a Hollywood film BUT only ONE ass shot is BS. The film is about gay porn and Brent Corrigan got famous for BEING a damn power bottom. I understand the film has to not go too far since it is not porn. BUT I am extremely disappointed. The reviews I read kept on saying the movie is sexually explicit.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

Apparently the camera is kept only from the waist up....sad.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

I'm thinking there may be but the nudity is of stand-ins & body doubles, NOT the stars. Also, a very disappointing thing.

reply

[–] stevenmorrisseyx 8 years ago

It is reminds me of Lars Von Tier movie nymphomanic I was so excited to see it but decided not to when I read a lot of body doubles were used. What is the point making a film about sex YET the actors will not appear nude? I read an article that James Franco and Keegan Allen are almost completely nude but they are wearing cock socks. So maybe Franco and Allen have an explicit sex scene? I read an article which said Franco and Allen REALLY get into character and their sex scenes are supposed to be pretty hot.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

Franco has never been shy about being nude. Socks probably to keep the R rating.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

My mistake..it's rated PG-13.

reply

[–] I_Heart_CM 8 years ago

IFC has updated the page and it looks like it's actually "Not Rated".

And for the record, I never thought you were cool. I only thought you were a lesbian.

reply

[–] cfinde 8 years ago

that is good news

reply

[–] bongcastaneda 8 years ago

Why should the main actors appear nude just because YOU want them to?
This is why there are body doubles.
Actors should not have to be forced to do anything they don't want to and neither should any person in any job.
They aren't slaves.

reply

[–] stevenmorrisseyx 8 years ago

Well they are NOT dedicated to the craft of acting. I never said I wanted porn I understand acting is about well acting. But it does cheapen a film using a body double the good news in this film body doubles were NOT used.

reply

[–] matanil 7 years ago

HOW? How does it cheapen it? Nude shots are just nude shots. They are not related to actual acting, plot, build up, inter-textuality or anything else that actually matter in whether a film is good or not. So how does using body doubles cheapen it? How does allowing the audience to enjoy a good performance from good actors who prefer not going nude (vs poorer actors who are willing to take their clothes off) cheapen anything?

reply

[–] SteverB 7 years ago

I've read you tramping through these threads and you're just annoying now. Ignore list.

__________________________________________
"In your opinion?"
"Um, yes your honor, in my opinion."

reply

[–] Hushpuppy_20 8 years ago

For the record Franco, Clayton, Allen and I believe Spencer Lofranco all show their backsides at one point or another. Didn't check close enough to see if they might have been butt doubles.

reply

[–] stevenmorrisseyx 7 years ago

Nope I saw the movie only three characters showed their asses Keegan Allen, Garrett Clayton and Spencer Lofranco. James Franco did NOT show his ass although apparently he was naked in the scene when Keegan Allen *beep* him up the ass.

reply