wheres this playing
visit http://billionsinchange.com/ October 5th!!!
sharehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY7f1t9y9a0
I placed a comment on the video:
I think your vision about the world problems is really spot on, but.... I have quite some remarks, so I started to type them during this clip.
10,500lumen of light requires at least 100W of LED lights. For a normal human being it's very hard to deliver 100W continuous during 1 hour of cycling (leaving loss due to friction and conversion-efficiency etcetera out of the equation). But after you stop cycling, the power production stops. 100W during 1h equals 0.1kWh of electric energy. Of course those people can do stuff with that, but not that many as in the video. Sure, you can easily charge your phone with 0.1kWh and use a 10W LED light during the night, but that's it.
Thermal energy isn't the answer. You need a huge amount of "pipelines" with graphene strings. And you can't put it into the magma. Graphene might not melt (melting point of about 4150K), but the drill will at such dept. And you can't push a wire trough a solid. Why don't you invest in nuclear fusion? That's the future and also provides unlimited energy pollution free.
Are those strings in the clip real graphene strings? Because nanotubes can be made as a string (has been done by scientists), but as far as I know, not graphene.
It's nonsense that the great inventions come from guys in their garage. Thousands of universities, technology institutes and companies invent millions of things every year. Some are small, some are large, but almost no one pays attention to those, because we expect them to make progress. But if some guy invents something in his garage, the local or sometimes national news makes an item about it.
Sorry but the distillation of sea water requires huge amounts of energy. Your machine doesn't work the way you're telling in the video. You just can't use the energy of the vaporized water to heat up the cold water. Of course you can get back some of the heat, but still you need about 4.18 kJ per degree per kg water to heat it up. And this is with 100% efficiency, which your machine doesn't have. The earth does this because the Sun radiates the earth with enormous amounts of energy per day. On a sunny day it is about 1kW per square meter of power at sea level.
You claim a thousand gallons of water per hour... Let's make a calculation. 1000 gallon weighs about 3800kg. If the water is about 20 degree celcius, you'll have to heat it 80 degrees. With 100% efficiency you need about 1.27 GJ to do this. Your machine consumes about 363kW of power to do this. I don't see the huge power cables to deliver this amount of power to your machine. Drinking water water doesn't contain more salt than agricultural water, but far less. Agriculture needs al kinds of salts to grow the crops.
The glass isn't filled in a fraction of a second btw. At a rate of a 1000 gallons per hour, it would could easily fill 3 of those glasses in 1 second. Besides, drinking "very very pure water" is really bad. Drinking 1/8 of a gallon of distilled water and you die. The cells in your body would explode if this water flows by (osmosis).
The ECP device is used against angina, but not against all those diseases you're mentioning in this clip. The scientific papers you talk about have nothing to do with the ECP helping against cancer or dementia for example. You just can't flush cancer cells away. Many of those diseases you're calling have nothing to do with viruses or bacteria in your bloodstream.
BTW, why are you showing a dummy in the video? Isn't the ECP safe for humans? A dummy also doesn't produce a pulse...
Sir David Lane might be a great scientist, but he never suggested to use an ECP against cancer or any of those other diseases you mention.
Just saw it on Hulu.
share