Blatantly biased

No, both are right about diamonds.

Diamonds aren't a precious resource because there's too many of them. There's too many apples in the world to pay huge money for them, say if someone tells you an apple costs 300 dollars. Factually, apples aren't a limited enough commodity to pay that amount of money.

HOWEVER, if people WANT to pay that much for apples, and do, then that's their value.

Things have a rational price and a psychological price. At the end of the day it's almost all psychological though. For instance, there could be some really rare worm and really rare stone. People wouldn't pay anything for the worm because they consider it ugly but would for the stone because they think it pretty.

It's BETTER than Penn & Teller's show because Penn & Teller's show is just their opionion presented as fact.

My iMDB profile http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4297325/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

I knew diamonds weren't worth close to what you pay, but I had no idea that the tradition of buying an engagement ring (diamond or not) was all because of a jewelry ad.

I'm erasing you and I'm happy!

Remember that line in the "diamonds" episode where the "swell" sez to his "squeeze" something like, "All I can give you is my undying love"?

That's how my (now ex-)wife and I got together. A good values match: We both could see thru the sham of bits of shiny stone as an indicator.

(Eventually, she regressed. That's why we divorced, 20 years later.)

--
And I'd like that. But that 5h1t ain't the truth. --Jules Winnfield

The only purpose I've ever needed diamonds for are saws and drill bits. They're GREAT for those. :)

I love that he spoke about diamonds. I think it's the dumbest thing and a waste of money (this is all my opinion of course). If I was a dude and with some typical girl that thought "she just had to have one", lol good luck with that cause it ain't coming from me.

My engagement ring/wedding ring (I helped pick it out) is a sterling silver ring with my birthstone (and supposedly tiny diamond accents on it). Let's just say it was less than $100 and I couldn't be happier and it's beautiful. I'd rather spend our money on a nice vacation or a house than a wedding and a giant ring. But hey, everyone is different.

I told my fiance now we can properly laugh at any couple with a rock on her finger. I couldn't for sure say that diamonds are worthless, I haven't personally done the research, but we just feel its a waste of money.

Would you like to see my pride and joy?

Yeah, but it's not. The government has to build the roads too, and when you have large numbers of people traveling predictable routes, roads and individual cars is a horribly inefficient way to do it. Add those road taxes to the cost of owning a car, and it's really expensive for everyone.

Fuel taxes were implemented to pay for roads, but they've never made up for the total road costs. Today user taxes and fees make up less than 50% of highway costs, the rest comes from other tax sources. So even if you don't own a car, you're still paying for roads.

Public transit costs money too, but as Americans are rethinking their relationship to the car, many urban developers are working to make public transit a more desirable option. This involves more transit lines to connect distant neighborhoods, urban renewal to turn parking lots and wasted spaces into thriving communities, and slowing down suburban sprawl - the main reason we became so dependent on cars to begin with. The paradox is we have to spend money on a low-use system in order to make it reach where we need to go - and only then will it become useful enough to entirely depend on it.

I've lived in cities with really good public transit, and it was great not having a car. I saved a ton of money, and still got around just fine. You can complain about government inefficiency, but endlessly building bigger roads without other options is not the way to go.