Green ep.

I'll give partial credit on the cars, but this episode was ALL in on promoting leftist agenda. I was actually surprised and hopeful for some ideological balance and honesty when "ruin" going green. But as usual, the culprit was capitalism and that desire of businesses to make money... always with sinister methods.

I appreciate that he showed how all the things the greenies do don't accomplish anything, but they were all done under that the pretext that individually they can't do enough, and everything about society and the economy is "destroying the planet." Heck, he even argued that bananas were bad for the environment because at the companies that sell them, there are people who drink coffee and wear jackets with zippers. And those are both bad.

And he completely accepted the premise that climate change is real, man-made, and rapidly destroying the planet. So much so, the show ends urging people to call their congressman to support the Paris Agreement.

I enjoyed the series, but as each episode passes, it gets harder and harder to keep watching...

I myself am a left-leaning, animal-loving, tree-hugging, middle-to-left-side-of-the-road, registered Independent. However, I can fully see how Adam's liberal agenda is pushed in MOST of the episodes. The episodes that come to mind with overt liberal agendas are: the prison episode (anti-corporate greed/race inequality in corrections), the Wild West episode (pro-woman/anti-government's treatment of Native Americans), the green episode (pro global-warming/anti-corporate greed) and the internet episode (anti-corporate monopoly). Yet, he also discusses things that might ruffle the feathers of liberals, too. One example is how electric cars aren't always the answer to reducing carbon footprints or how big-game hunting might actually save more endangered animals.

Honestly, I don't disagree with too much of what Adam reveals ("ruins"), but I CAN see where much of it is indeed skewed towards his own viewpoint, which is probably quite leftist. Also, I appreciate that he lists his statistical sources in the top corner of the screen as he makes a statement. But, everyone knows that "data" can be skewed toward the outcome desired by the person crunching the numbers. Hard facts, however, are rarely disputable, such as the specific date that the first American woman was appointed governor in Wyoming.

I take the show with a grain of salt, and I would suggest that everyone do that. Some of the silly skits they have certainly fit my sense of humor and I find myself laughing out loud.

I didn't follow Adam when he blamed soda companies for litter. The consumers were responsible too return glass bottles back then like we are responsible to dispose of plastic bottles now. He does make me look at things differently though. It is in the soda companies interest to encourage consumers to not litter with their logo on it. That's why they would have started their own anti-litter campaigns.

Some counter science to how much of global warming is man made
https://youtu.be/Oh6zDbWMuP0
https://youtu.be/g5LpwL4NKbw