MovieChat Forums > Doctor Thorne (2016) Discussion > I wish they'd just film the book.

I wish they'd just film the book.


If I hadn't read Dr. Thorne this series would have passed as a reasonably enjoyable pretty little costume drama. But having read this and Trollop's earlier books in the series I was looking forward to a gently meandering story with little asides to the reader and subtly sketched characters.
So what happens when they extract the bare bones of the story, select a talented but totally mismatched cast (compared with my vision of the characters) and jolly it along to fit in to a 3 hour drama.
Well, to answer my own question, you get this program. What a pity that every novel that is a potential costume drama is stripped back to a series of tropes such that they could have been written by anyone. It would be nice if someone had the radical idea of actually adapting a book as it was written and putting that to a audience - you never know but we, the goggle eyed folk behind the 4th wall, might have the patience and intelligence to appreciate something closer to the original source.
I don't fault the cast, there are several favourites of mine and some interesting new faces, but not a single character seems quite right for the part - at least as I saw them when I read the book. Particularly annoying is the casting of Miss Dunstable as an American. I enjoyed watching Alison Brie but making this character an alien diminished the perception of an interesting clever woman moving amongst these entitled people whilst gently refusing to be like them.

reply

I enjoyed it, but felt it was too short for an adaptation. I haven't read the book yet, but maybe that's why -- I felt like the sisters subplots were truncated. (How about SHOWING me the proposal, instead of TELLING ME about it?)

reply

(How about SHOWING me the proposal, instead of TELLING ME about it?)


That's one of Julian Fellowes's hallmarks; he did that sort of thing all the time in Downton Abbey.

reply

Show, down't tell, dude.

That's like the first rule of writing. =P

I enjoyed DA for about the first two seasons and then I caught on to its redundancies and lack of creative scope.

I feel, actually, that Fellowes does just fine when 'adapting' material -- I liked his "Young Victoria," and enjoyed this as well, despite a few nitpicks (it felt too rushed / condensed, and I wanted more of the subplots).

reply

I caught on in s1, lol. I couldn't believe he didn't show Matthew's proposal to Mary on stage! And what about Sybil's ball? Huge letdown.

As for rushed/condensed, Fellowes probably didn't have much control over the number of eps.

There are delicious subplots galore in earlier Anthony Trollope adaptations, like The Pallisers, The Barchester Chronicles, and even He Knew He Was Right and The Way We Live Now (the latter two of which did not have such long, luxurious episode schedules).

reply

I would bet money that Fellowes changed Miss Dunstable’s nationality to American so there would be an obvious parallel to Cora in Downton Abbey.

reply

Maybe, or perhaps to make it more attractive to a potential American audience? It bugged me because as written Miss Dunstable is such an interesting character - and very British.

reply

A potential American audience isn't going to watch this just because there's an American supporting character, or not watch something because there aren't any Americans. Americans who watch films and series like this are Anglophiles who read books.

reply