Keith and drugs
Richards's reputation as a drug fiend is of course well deserved, but that popular image of him obscures how intelligent he is about the music world. Forget his opinions on the Beatles, George Michael, or punk music. He's always spot on about the industry itself, as well as the root musical forms that inspired most every type of music from the early 20th century onwards. I also find him very sharp on general life matters. He's perceptive, articulate when he wants to be, and has a knack for clarity and cutting through the BS. Many people prefer simplistic views of others, and opt to romanticize Richards for his remarkable ability to survive the drug abuse, reducing him to a rock n' roll caricature and nothing more. He is not to be lumped in with meatheads also especially known for their excess like Axl Rose, David Lee Roth, Ozzy Osbourne, etc. He's light years ahead of those guys in brain power. As he states in his "Life" autobiography, he had what seemed to be a more intelligent and controlled approach toward his drug excesses, so far as his ability to function as a musician is concerned. Keith never had a long stretch where his drug habits completely removed him from the music scene, like Clapton for instance, who might never have survived heroin without Pete Townshend coming to his rescue.
share