Easy to compare cherry-picked items and ignoring the whole...
I get what Moore is trying to do, and I agree the USA has lost its way due to greed and whatnot (most of these notions started indeed in USA). And I know Moore has only so much time to provide context.
But still, the resulting comparison seems at times really flawed:
a) All of the countries compared to USA are:
- SMALL in population (exception being France and Germany)
- With a very homogeneous population (exception again France and Germany)
- They don't exactly make it easy for people to immigrate to them (same exception)
- Many of them are almost third world countries (Italy, Portugal, Tunisia) most would think twice to emigrate to unless they got a job offer on hand (they can be nice to live WHEN you got a job already, good luck getting one if you land unemployed).
That alone makes them so much more manageable due to minimal conflicting interests from different groups.
And I mean, come on, he even mentions Iran as number 1 in stem cell research. Even if that's true, do we WANT the USA to turn into Iran to achieve that? This was cherry picking at its worst. May as well showcase Mussolini's Italy to show how to run a timely train system.
Regarding France:
- they conveniently don't show a place with significant immigrant presence, where you would realize how poorly Muslim immigration has assimilated and thus how problematic has become.
- they don't show their whole financial situation (people there ain't exactly raking it in or landing jobs as soon as they graduate).
- they sure as heck don't show you their prisons (if you think USA is cruel and unusual, take a crack at these ones)
Regarding Germany:
- not sure, for they are the economic engine of Europe and don't know if they have an assimilation problem like France (although recent attacks sure don't point in the right direction).
So Germany for me is the fairest comparison to USA as to what USA has neglected and should correct.