That prisoner in Norway...


The one with the Mike Tyson tattoo. Is it just me, or did he totally look like Tom Hardy?

reply

I liked this movie a lot, and I've liked all of the sections in other MM movies where
he has talked about socialism and what the US is missing.

But, this thing with the Scandinavian prisons is harder for me to digest. What do you
think about that? That guy was a murderer. They did not go into the facts of the case,
but still, I don't know what to think of that?

reply

Not sure what you are trying to say other than "you don't know what to think." Do you think that punishment rather than rehabilitation should be the focus? Obviously the Norwegians disagree.

Perhaps it ought to be enough to remove the culprit from society rather than to brutalize him further. And think how much less brutalizing it is to be a guard in a more humane system.

reply

What is wrong with saying I don't know what to think ... I don't.
I can see both sides.
For someone like the BTK killer, or that Anton Brevik I think his name was who was the mass-murderer of all those kids I have deep reservations about treating someone like that as human, however, they are human? I think inhuman animals should be put to death humanely, but the problem in the US with this is that the police and judicial system obviously does not work and is biased against certain people and groups.
If I had to make a decision I would go with the way they it in Norway or some of the other countries. I did not notice a lot of problem racial issues there though, or terrorists.
It is a bigger question and problem than is shown here is the point, but certainly the law and prisons in the US South are disgusting ... as is most of the South, having lived there for a short while.
This is a great movie and I hope people will see it and start thinking, and maybe vote for Bernie Sanders. We definitely need a revolution in the US ... this way that all the other developed countries have taken clearly they cannot all be wrong and the US is the only place that is right, or there is some overriding reason why Americans have to live like this.
The school lunches in France compared to the US almost made me cry, and I am a tough guy ... that was revolting.

reply

Sorry - I didn't mean to imply it was wrong not to know what to think, just that the way you stated it was somewhere between statement and question.

I've read that many American children are growing up not knowing how to use utensils because all food is presented to them as finger food. French children are not only eating a variety of healthy and delicious food, but they are being painlessly taught the ways of polite society. Yet we are still transitioning to healthier burritos.

reply

Well I think the facts speak for themselves, sure you can put bad people into a bad jail and treat them like dogs or even kill them. But guess what, America's crime rate is not going down and the number of re-offenders are just going up.

In Norway the statistics and facts speak for themselves, their crime rate has dropped since this new prison system was introduced and the number of re-offenders has gone down to become the lowest of any country in the world.

At the end of day that is all that matters, what is the point of having police and a judicial system if it does not do the one thing it is in place to do? Namely decrease crime and keep normal citizens safe.

I think every country in the world should learn from this movie. It is impossible to become a perfect country, there will always be crime there will always be certain problems, but at least if they adopted everything shown in this movie. Hell the world would be an amazing place to live in then.

reply

>> In Norway the statistics and facts speak for themselves,
>> their crime rate has dropped since this new prison system
>> was introduced and the number of re-offenders has gone
>> down to become the lowest of any country in the world.

You might do well to remember that one does not cause or
imply the other. There are lots of things that Norway does
that may cause less crime, and since they have less crime
and have seen a new way to exist they may have implemented
more human prisons.

Also, I believe that in America the government doesn't really
care about the crime rate or the prison rate, except as to
how they can make money off it. The kind of money and
protection the wealthy have in America means they virtually
never face any crime, except maybe white collar Bernie Madoff
type crime. In the US no one with authority or power wants to
spend the money to make a better more peaceful or less
crime ridden society ... they just do not care.

America is going the opposite way from all the other developed
countries, and the developed countries of the world ought to
start to care about this, because the US is amassing money and
power that is threatening the rest of the developed world instead
of doing anything positive to develop the underdeveloped world.

True?

reply

Please explain the differences in the rate of reoffending? Unless they actually do something different AFTER the person has been released it can only be the prisons that make the difference.

reply

I think you are getting more statistical than human behavior indicates with that question.
You speak to people's motivations or perhaps their genetics or even their peer group.
It is kind of random, so I don't think you can make deductions about that.

reply

I know I'm super late to respond.

I know there's a Norwegian guy below who tells it like it is (aka: Norwegians don't approve of their lenient prison system, they're supporting REVENGE on people who did nothing to them).

I have absolutely NO IDEA what counts as a murder in your country OR HIS country.

But still - I'm sure you can think of a situation when you in some way take part in someone's death, and in your justice system it's consider murder. Examples are: you're drunk or drugged, someone literally falls of from the sky (jumping of a building or whatever) and you're the murderer BECAUSE you were drunk/drugged while observing that. Show me a country that doesn't punish people like that - and YES, Portugal would. Not putting people to jail for alcohol/drug usage is one thing, but assumption of guilt in case of usage is another.

And that was only an example. I'm sure you can think of a situation that would make you guilty in your country's justice system, even though you did nothing wrong.

And that's not even mentioning actual murders committed by someone who would never do that to anyone else (so again: revenge is one thing, but actual incarceration is supposed to isolate people from others to PREVENT them from doing the same thing - what if they killed someone on purpose but won't do it to ANYONE ELSE, EVER?)

And that's only murders. Then we have people who stole or lied or made someone make a bad decision... or people who did absolutely nothing to anyone, but were caught smoking weed (remember Norway is not The Netherlands/Czech Republic/Jamaica/whatever).

And I didn't mention this but kind of have to... The glorious USA happily kills people having brain tumors, who can be cured with a comparably simple surgical procedure. We know some of the "murderers" had half of their brains shut down when they were committing their crimes. And we know it wasn't actually them who committed those! You aren't yourself when you have a tumor shutting down half of your brain. But it's more important to get revenge on the umm... animal (for lack of better word), than to bring back the human that was supposed to live in that body. And those cases are piling up even though we've started diagnosing the death row waiting list very very recently. Go read up on it.

Yeah I know, no one will read this :( TL;DR: most people are sociopaths demanding revenge for stuff they never experienced, or were, or will ever be, in any way, affected by. Meanwhile they want a revengeful justice system, instead of something fixing people who did something wrong.

reply

[deleted]

I can tell you that most people in Norway are against this lenient punishment for violent criminals. We don't want them back into society. But the politicians only think about their reputation around the world and do whatever they can to look super enlightened, humane and progressive. It's not something shared by most of the norwegian people at all.

reply

And yet it seems to be working fairly well since your violent crime rate is so low, much lower than ours.


"How was the war, sir?"
"As any war, ma'am, a waste of good men." (Poldark)

reply

There are people that are against the system but there is also a lot that is for it, although a lot of people in general thinks it is a bit too kind. Breivik (the mass murderer) probably has the hardest sentence in Norway because of the isolation even from other inmates as none of them even wants to be around him. The government then does the humane thing and keep him away from other people to prevent others from killing him. To be fair though i dont think most people would actually care if he ended up dead though.

Personalty I'm for a rehabilitation system though not because i think they deserves anything at all but if you dont have a prison system oriented against making your prisoners good citizens what is the point to even have them there at all? If you are just going to put people you dont like in a 2x3m cage for the rest of their life, they will forever just be a drain on society. If you also just keep someone in isolation for lets say 10 years most would be bound to have social problems and therefor struggle with getting into society. Bastøy ( the Island prison) is a place that a lot of criminals go to in the end of their sentence simply because it is isolated but it also prepares you more for society.

lets say you steal something while you also got drugs on you and you get caught in the US. Your sentences are simply added together. This results in some people to end up with stupid long sentences that servers no point at all for a lot of small crimes.

We are also seeing the legalization of weed in some states in the US now, but there is also people who serve a life sentence, were the only crime committed is related to weed.

- A Norwegian

reply

Well, for a country that a lot of people think of as "Christian," we in the US haven't done a lot of turning the other cheek lately. Not that that concept refers to crimes necessarily, but you'd think it would influence people more than "an eye for an eye," etc. I tend to think that if we make the effort to treat everyone humanely, even people who commit crimes, most of whom were abused as children and have a lot of problems from that, we'll have a more humane society with fewer crimes and more opportunities for more people to live a decent life.


"How was the war, sir?"
"As any war, ma'am, a waste of good men." (Poldark)

reply

Well the "an eye for an eye" also have a longer version "an eye for an eye, makes the world blind". The fighting needs to stop at some point...

reply

how naive is it too think that would actually work with prisoners in America

"These Pretzles Are Making Me Thirsty"
- "Michael Richards - Seinfeld"

reply

What would work? Are Americans so different from any other human beings? Are we more terrible than the rest of humanity?


"How was the war, sir?"
"As any war, ma'am, a waste of good men." (Poldark)

reply

i doubt that there are Arian and Black gangs in the Norway prison just as an example. No America is not bad its just a huge country so saying prisoners in Philadelphia are the same type of people as the one in Alaska or Utah would be naive too.Just like Belgian prisoners aren't the same as the one in Albania. These are just some examples why it wouldn't work but there's more too it.

"These Pretzles Are Making Me Thirsty"
- "Michael Richards - Seinfeld"

reply

The thing is that there is the vast majority of any subject, and then there
are the "Breviks" ... the special cases that people try to use to prove the
general point.

In one sense, I don't care what happens to Brevik as long as he does
not get the chance to harm anyone again.

On the other hand, I believe that just in general, Brevik's actions is some
way show that he is not human, or even more of that, he is anti-human, and
I think the hygienic thing to do with something like this is to end its life
in order to keep others safe. That is assuming there is nothing to gained
by studying this person to find out as much as possible about this
genetics and environment in order to learn something for the greater number
of people alive.

The thing that I think did not serve this movie well, at least in terms of the
Norway prison system, was to explain the circumstances of the blonde man
with the Mike Tyson tattoos ... what was he really in there for? Without
knowing that, or the circumstances of the worst murderer in the system,
most likely Brevik, the movie turns into something that hinges of deception
and not on facts, unless Michael Moore is trying to also pander to ex-cons?

reply

[deleted]

I have yet to watch the movie. It's on my to-do list but I'm just curious, since everyone else completely ignored the post, ...did you ever get an answer to your question? 

reply

Yes. It's just you.

reply

He was hot! A very handsome man.

reply

@datacacher I don't see it, but here's a screenshot so that others can give their opinion:
http://imgur.com/a/HA5D4

reply