A starting point? Okay, I suppose you also believe the idea that these jobs are for high school students. I'll debunk both of those myths. If these jobs were for high school students, they wouldn't exists. Most public schools are in session from roughly 8 AM to 3 PM. They obviously can't work before school and preparation/commuting for work after school would take about an hour, so businesses with minimum wage positions couldn't operate before 4 PM. Saying that it's not something to live one's life on is basically saying that they're expecting to miraculously find a better-paying job, get a promotion, or attain an education. I've discussed the education bit, already. There aren't enough positions within any establishment to promote all the minimum wage earners to higher paying careers. Plus, there'd be no one working the lower-paid jobs unless the business has poor employee retention which is a sign of a poor business.
As far as what happened in Seattle with people wanting less hours, it's because it makes sense. You see, liberals wanted a hike of the minimum wage straight to $15 per hour while conservatives argued it would be a bad thing. You can blame that on them. Instead, the decided to incrementally increase wages as a method of adjustment. The minimum wage increased from $9.32 to $11, a difference of $1.68. Post-tax, that amounts to only $60 per 40-hour week. If someone is only receiving SNAP benefits, by the end of the month, that person only has $45 more each month from this so-called minimum wage "hike." Most people receive much more than that because they have dependents. They can't afford to lose all their benefits for a total increase of $240 per month. That's ridiculous.
Now, you want to condemn people for having children? I guess you're also pro-life. That plays people into a corner. "No, you can't have an abortion, but you better be able to take care of your children without using welfare." If you aren't pro-life, you aren't considering the circumstances for which people do have kids. Some are raped, some don't believe in abortion, some were married and had to divorce or had a spouse that died. Yes another irrational argument on your behalf.
And have you just COMPLETELY forgotten the figure on corporate welfare versus social welfare? You're upset with the wrong people, my friend. I don't understand why people trust corporations. We have Google. Just take a look at how many times they've screwed us over. Not paying taxes, getting multi-billion dollar bailouts, getting unnecessary subsidies, displacing jobs for their own interest, selling us products that kill us, et cetera. Self-imposed poverty exists, but that's not the case for most people. People are born into poverty and are statistically less likely to find upward mobility. There are countless reasons for this and I'll be more than happy to share them with you if you ask nicely. Again, corporate welfare = 92 billion (from rich people who can afford to pay up); social welfare = 59 billion (from people who are in poverty).
Oh, and you must have no idea what your rights are or what a police state is. Seriously, look up to the events and requirements of people that led up to Nazi Germany. The cop was on a power trip, the DA said it, everything about that situation was wrong, and you know all of this. I wouldn't expect a racist to admit it, though.
reply
share