MovieChat Forums > Manson's Lost Girls (2016) Discussion > THAT was Charlie? Pointless movie with ...

THAT was Charlie? Pointless movie with pointless casting

posted 8 years ago by disturbedtool68
5 replies | jump to latest

Worst-Manson-Ever

I guess the feeling was 'this movie is about the girls, so it doesnt matter who we cast as Charlie'

Big mistake. This guy didnt look, act or sound like Charlie. They couldnt even find a stringy long hair wig to give him.
I had to keep reminding myself he was supposed to be Charles Manson.

This movie had absolutely no point to it whatsoever.

If anyone wants to see things from the female perspective, try the Helter Skelter 2004 movie. Or even the original.

===

If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice

[–] ClaireRedfieldFanForever 8 years ago

Need to add all the actors had perfect white teeth and where clean,Where in real life Charles Manson and his groupies were druggies and dirty.

[–] JaggedDagger 8 years ago

This Manson looked like Kim Coates from Sons of Anarchy not Charles Manson!

[–] zznoory 8 years ago

I can tell from the commercial lol

[–] ammovies 8 years ago

I've seen this movie twice and nothing pissed me off more than the guy they got to play Charlie Manson. Didn't even look like him. Manson's supposed to be really ugly and homely looking, NOT some Jared Leto look a like!

[–] Abbalish 7 years ago

Gethin Anthony in Aquarius is 100 times better