MovieChat Forums > Swap (2016) Discussion > Dog was the Best Part

Dog was the Best Part


My favorite character was Professor Clarence Peterson's dog. So soulful.


No two persons ever watch the same movie.

reply

The dog had the best lines and made the most sense...

I could sense this was a 4/10 film almost from the start... then the kettles whistled and he poured his hot water onto the tea bag - from a ceramic kettle.. and I knew they'd not be bothered with logic or continuity.

The film was heavily padded out with waste-of-time slow motion effects - all over the place, almost nowhere that it was needed. I guess they couldn't think of any more crap to write for the story and padded a 60 minute film out to 90 minutes.

I've seen better stories written by ten year old kids in "Story Writing 101" class.

And the actors? have they managed their millions from the decent films they did so badly that they are destitute and need to act in crap like this?
I'd donate £100 for them not to make utter arse-gravy like this film!

And the basic concept - you have nanotech that "infects" people then you transfer consciousness into them (via what, radio? Nano WIFI?)..

If you had that technology then it's highly likely that you have the ability to control the brain - you don't need to transfer consciousness, just take over their brain and make then do the deed...

And - how do they transfer in anyway... we are told early in the film that signal disruption and blockers mean they can't get good intel of those areas..

Resounding and echoing "MEH!"..

And it seems that all they make now are this sort of diarrhoea and "Remake of..." films.

reply