Red Ice Live - Michael Hoffman on "Denial propaganda BS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuzQY1klxzo
shareWell, what do you know. An "alt-right" (read: neo-fascist) internet "radio" site has a well-known Holocaust denier on, and -- surprise! he denies the Holocaust.
And the poster knows he can't defend it, so it's the passive-aggressive paste-link-and-run.
Just more evidence that Holocaust denial, for all of its efforts to present itself as academically objective and intellectually sustainable, is really just a toy of the sieg-heil droolboys.
@%<
You are just another propagandist, being paid to counter the facts of many people from around the world, who are finding out the real facts.
So, David Cole, who is also Jewish, is a liar than?...for the past twenty five plus years of investigation, that even he received has to go to ground because of death threats by extreme Jewish mafia.
Mate!, the lie game is almost up!
You are just another propagandist, being paid to counter the facts of many people from around the world, who are finding out the real facts.
Yeah, that's what you losers have to tell yourself. I've never been paid a dime for showing how crazystupid Holocaust denial is, and how crazystupid people like you are for buying into it.
So, David Cole, who is also Jewish, is a liar than?
I always find it hilarious that the wackballs who declare that the Holocaust is all a big Jewish scam, in which literally millions of Jews participated by pretending to be dead, are suddenly: "David Cole can't be a liar -- he's Jewish!" share
For a crime to be proven you need forensic evidence. Witness testimony from people who profit from said witness testimony and confessions proveably induced under torture are inadmissible in court. Forensic evidence trumps all others.
There is zero forensic proof of the jewish holocaust.
FACT.
Another double post. You're not the quite sharpest cheddar in the cheese shop, are you.
shareFACT.
You keep using that word, but I think you don't know what it means.
Remember the last time you claimed that nazis were tortured into confessing their role in the holocuast? But you thought you could pass off unconfirmed claims of torture in another trial? You thought your Roden crap was something good; just made you look like a dipstick, again. share
There is zero forensic proof of the jewish holocaust.
Where's the "forensic evidence" – or any hard, documentary evidence for that matter – for the existence of your alleged massive conspiracy of forgers, instructors and torturers (quote: "lolohoax")?
Any memos? Any written orders? Any correspondence? Any equivalent to a Führerbefehl?
Or at least some "unreliable" eyewitnesses, for example some Nazi whistleblowers explaining the exact details of this conspiracy, preferably with corroborating evidence?
Exactly. It simply does not exist.
All you guys do all day long is claiming that "the official story cannot be true because of this and that". Perceived inconsistencies that only exist in your ideologically conditioned minds most of the time, but no hard facts. Not even a fraction of the evidence that does exist in support of the factuality of the Shoah.
It's somehow ironic how deniers doubt the plausibility of the history of the Shoah all the time, yet don't realize that their implied conspiracy theory has not a shred of plausibility at all.
The "Hoax" – where's the evidence?
http://www.phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/~jamie/the-hoax.shtml share
[deleted]
For a crime to be proven you need forensic evidence. Witness testimony from people who profit from said witness testimony and confessions provably induced under torture are inadmissible in court. Forensic evidence trumps all others.
There is zero forensic proof of the jewish holocaust.
FACT.
For a crime to be proven you need forensic evidence.
Nope. Still, it's hilarious to see you guys try to sound all lawyer-like. share
Are confessions now admittedly acquired under torture at Nuremberg admissible?
Nuremburg was a real trial with real defenses and real acquittals. Sorry if that goes against your defense of the Nazis.
shareQuestion still stands. Is torturing defendants against all international conventions???
A simple yes or no will suffice.
Question still stands.
Just like all the questions of mine that you've dodged in your half-assed imitation of a self-appointed prosecuting attorney, you poor thing you.
share
Haha Mr Tel Aviv your little trial you claim is evidence used vicious torture to obtain confessions entirely invalidating any convictions therefore completely invalidating the holocaust as a serious historical event. It doesn't even merit any discussion Mr Tel Aviv.
shareMichael Hoffman wrote a book about the Talmud didn't he. Doesn't the jewish religious book that trumps the torah declare that sex with prepubescent children is perfectly legal??
Rhetorical question because of course it does.