It is amazing that they have the money and tech to bring Brian back

Forget about real life foo.

The previous movie didn't "forget about real life" with the tribute and retiring of the character, so I don't think I should have to, either. At this point, Brian being "basically Dom's brother-in-law" doesn't matter. It doesn't. Because Paul Walker died and the last movie tastefully acknowledged that. There's certain lines you don't cross when it comes to the circumstances of someone's death, in this case, Vin Diesel just wants to exploit his co-star's death in the name of greed. And it's pretty obvious. They went through all the trouble of retiring the character for an understandable reason and closing his story, and because it played a part in its financial success (and it would've made money anyway had Paul lived, but let's face it, his death did contribute to it), now they want to pull a 180 and bring him back for no reason other than to capitalize on that. Paul's death is a lot more important than Brian being Dom's brother-in-law. It's not about "making the franchise the best it can be", it's about greed and nothing more. It's interesting how you seem to be ignoring that, or you're just failing to wrap your mind around it. We can't "forget about real life". We're not talking about an injury or something trivial. We're talking about a person's death, which there's no coming back from. And you think it's alright for them to just forget about what happened to him-- and even worse, try to use it to their advantage, so I'm not quite sure what's the matter with you. Let's think about the concept of having a little respect for the deceased, which overrules the idea of bringing back a character who was retired due to said fact, all in the name of capitalizing on his death, before calling someone a "foo".


Logan, buddy. It's me, Deadpool! I shot youuuuuu....

reply share

add reply

formatting help