The show has a fine cast, but better than "The Crown," "Game of Thrones," AND "Downton Abbey?" That's a little questionable.
http://www.thebluspot.com/single-post/2017/01/29/The-Winners-of-the-23rd-Annual-Screen-Actors-Guild-Awards
Winona's black cloud.She a shopliftah.Farizzle.
shareBecause Stranger things had the most diverse cast so they could make the Anti Trump statement which really sucks
If i had $1 everytime i had no clue what was going on, id ask people why they were giving me dollars
The cast isn't diverse, they have one black kid. That's it lol
sharethey still won only because they knew what kind of speech he'd give. its all *beep* they know all well what they will say before they go up there
game of Thrones should have won hands donw
If i had $1 everytime i had no clue what was going on, id ask people why they were giving me dollars
The cast isn't diverse you dip sh#t
shareWell deserved. Shame Harbour had to sour it with politics but I give him credit for making it vague enough to be exploited by both sides even if I know what he meant.
shareSame here. They did deserve the price, but putting politics everywhere is just... anyway, you are right it was vague enough and had good parts
shareHonestly, The Crown is better. But I was glad to see them win.
And Harbour gave such a kick ass speech.
If anybody doesn't understand what the show was about, they should find his speech and listen.
SAGs are voted on by actors. Maybe American actors got sick of British casts, The Crown, Game of Thrones, and Downtojn Abbey winning over and over. And Game of Thrones never wins acting awards. And Maggie Smith does the same thing over and over again, and it is not worth so many awards.
The Crown had two great roles, Elizabeth and Winston Churchill. The Sag award is for ensemble acting, for the whole cast, so not at all crazy that it won.
The most overated show is the only award it should have won for.
share