ok--big spoiler


Not too bad, but the stepfather overacted, and we knew from the very beginning who the kidnapper would be when they showed a meaningful closeup of that woman's face. Suspicion did manage to shift from time to time to other characters--the boyfriend, the stepfather, himself, etc., and the real identity of the woman was completely unexpected. Typical Lifetime writers' assumptions that women become dangerous maniacs when they are unable to have children.

reply

I thought he overacted and it was seemed so fake. The stupid naive girl who geomaps all her locations. Same old plot about a busy mother who remarried. A teenager who feels she is not wanted. Typical kidnappers. Bad acting. Unreal acting, no one talks in real life as if they are reading from a script.

State champ in martial arts, trained with firearms, I eFF'n dare you!

reply

I thought is was an above average Lifetime movie. I would agree that most of the actors were mediocre to poor, with only the lead (the daughter) giving a credible performance. There were two aspects of the movie that I liked though. The lead being a half sibling with the little brother, which created a different dynamic than if they both had the same father. I also thought some of the social media stuff was interesting.

reply

Too much projection form Matt the stepfather. Yucky with the son and then shrill and hormonal for most of the rest of the movie. But good twist with the Lorraine character.

reply