Why is this listed on IMDB?
Not trolling, but a genuine question:
Why should this stage production be listed on IMDB? I understand it's televised live in theaters, but it's neither a movie, nor a television play, nor even a filmed play yet.
Not trolling, but a genuine question:
Why should this stage production be listed on IMDB? I understand it's televised live in theaters, but it's neither a movie, nor a television play, nor even a filmed play yet.
Why should this stage production be listed on IMDB? I understand it's televised live in theaters, but it's neither a movie, nor a television play, nor even a filmed play yet.The listing is for the filmed play. It is classified as 'event'screening. Its Thursday showing was listed as third in UK's films last week. It was shown in 87% of all UK cinemas, and drew an audience of 225,000 in 25 countries. Encore showings are already sold out in many places, not only in Britain, but around the world.
Its Thursday showing was listed as third in UK's films last week. It was shown in 87% of all UK cinemas, and drew an audience of 225,000 in 25 countries. Encore showings are already sold out in many places, not only in Britain, but around the world.
Yeah, I can understand why you're confused. It's a hybrid, isn't it? Both play and film. And I agree it would help if IMDb made some sort of clarification for this type of production. Then again, there haven't been too many yet, so perhaps it's too soon.
It's a shame you missed the showing -- and a free ticket, yet! The 240 minutes flew by. Honestly, not scary at all! This article is a great insight to the event and seems pretty even-handed in its reporting: http://mashable.com/2015/10/20/benedict-cumberbatch-hamlet-live/#X1zfpJOZRSq8
#JeSuisCharlie
I passed on a free ticket tonight by the way, because 240 minutes seemed too scary!
If the play has been recorded and broadcast, then it is a filmed play. IMDb is a cinema database, and this production was broadcast to cinemas.
shareThe other user above you answered my question.
By the way, this was not a recorded play.
If it's been broadcast, it has also been recorded. Given demand, they might show it again sometime, as they did with Tom Hiddleston's "Coriolanus".
shareIt's a play that was recorded. It's a recorded play. I'm watching it right now actually...
shareYes, it was a recorded play. Streaming would have been impossible in a lot of places because of the time difference.
I saw it tonight for the third time - two in the movie theater and one in London. I love Cumberbatch and thought he was brilliant. Had it not been directed by Lyndsey Turner who cut the play to shreds, he would have been even more brilliant.
Actually seeing it on screen is much better than it was seeing it on the stage. The set was so overblown, for one, and secondly, Turner didn't know where to put the focus. I mean, I never saw Gertrude drink the poison - there was so much going on and she was way stage right. As a matter of fact, the whole thing ended rather abruptly. The cameraman, however, knew where to put the camera, which made it better.
People have loved it, though, which is great. It is a classic story.