Why is this listed on IMDB?


Not trolling, but a genuine question:
Why should this stage production be listed on IMDB? I understand it's televised live in theaters, but it's neither a movie, nor a television play, nor even a filmed play yet.

reply

Why should this stage production be listed on IMDB? I understand it's televised live in theaters, but it's neither a movie, nor a television play, nor even a filmed play yet.
The listing is for the filmed play. It is classified as 'event'screening. Its Thursday showing was listed as third in UK's films last week. It was shown in 87% of all UK cinemas, and drew an audience of 225,000 in 25 countries. Encore showings are already sold out in many places, not only in Britain, but around the world.

Not sure if I answered your question, but I hope it helps.


#JeSuisCharlie

reply

Its Thursday showing was listed as third in UK's films last week. It was shown in 87% of all UK cinemas, and drew an audience of 225,000 in 25 countries. Encore showings are already sold out in many places, not only in Britain, but around the world.


OK, I hadn't realized it was even considered for box office rankings, but still it's odd to me. Apparently it belongs in a different category altogether, that of "event cinema", as the Guardian calls it, or "event screening", as you said. I'm being nerdy, but I wish IMDB could in some way distinguish this type of showings in the database, like it does for TV movies and TV series for example.
Cheers for replying!

I passed on a free ticket tonight by the way, because 240 minutes seemed too scary!

reply

Yeah, I can understand why you're confused. It's a hybrid, isn't it? Both play and film. And I agree it would help if IMDb made some sort of clarification for this type of production. Then again, there haven't been too many yet, so perhaps it's too soon.

It's a shame you missed the showing -- and a free ticket, yet! The 240 minutes flew by. Honestly, not scary at all! This article is a great insight to the event and seems pretty even-handed in its reporting: http://mashable.com/2015/10/20/benedict-cumberbatch-hamlet-live/#X1zfpJOZRSq8

#JeSuisCharlie

reply

I passed on a free ticket tonight by the way, because 240 minutes seemed too scary!

I understand what you mean and I was a bit scared at the prospect myself. It's my probably erroneous but deep-seated belief that Shakespeare = boring. Not to mention a 3+ hour stretch of it.

I wouldn't normally plan to see a long film on a night where I have to get up early for work the next day, but I knew this would be worth it so I decided to stick it out. Surprisingly, the hours flew by and my eyes were glued to the screen almost the entire time. I've even bought tickets to see it again, that's how good and entertaining it was. If you get another chance to see it I definitely recommend you give it a try.

reply

If the play has been recorded and broadcast, then it is a filmed play. IMDb is a cinema database, and this production was broadcast to cinemas.

reply

The other user above you answered my question.
By the way, this was not a recorded play.

reply

If it's been broadcast, it has also been recorded. Given demand, they might show it again sometime, as they did with Tom Hiddleston's "Coriolanus".

reply

It's a play that was recorded. It's a recorded play. I'm watching it right now actually...

reply

Yes, it was a recorded play. Streaming would have been impossible in a lot of places because of the time difference.

I saw it tonight for the third time - two in the movie theater and one in London. I love Cumberbatch and thought he was brilliant. Had it not been directed by Lyndsey Turner who cut the play to shreds, he would have been even more brilliant.

Actually seeing it on screen is much better than it was seeing it on the stage. The set was so overblown, for one, and secondly, Turner didn't know where to put the focus. I mean, I never saw Gertrude drink the poison - there was so much going on and she was way stage right. As a matter of fact, the whole thing ended rather abruptly. The cameraman, however, knew where to put the camera, which made it better.

People have loved it, though, which is great. It is a classic story.

reply