Owners are jerks


They pay the manager $35,000 a year and expect her to work 55 hours a week? That is garbage pay and they came off as total *beep* in that convo.

Then the dispute about the main street location. They agreed to move on a particular date and are not living up to it. Only reason they were doing so well on main street was a grandfathered monopoly allowing them to briefly be there with no competition. It would be unfair to others if the town went back on the rules already established and gave these guys a permanent main street monopoly

reply

No I don't think they should have a monopoly. I can see both sides to the debate on whether pot shops should be allowed on main street. But when someone commented how Alcohol can be bought on main street that seemed absurd. Granted it is IN a resterant setting, not a liquor store. It still seems quite unfair and arbitrary though.

As for the manager's pay "Cannabis meets Capitalism", isn't that the shows slogan?

reply

I too was a little surprised at the low manager pay. But on reflection, she was a manager without a degree (Brian brings up the point that when things were slow prior to legalization, the manager could study for school while at work). Plus, she was a manager that was essentially managing retail. Is her pay really that off the mark from department managers at the mall or the local Arctic Circle? And, while I was certainly sympathetic to her wanting a pay bump, I think her renegotiation tactic of saying, "Pay a whole lot more money and when someone sticks a gun in my face, I'll open the safe, give them all the money, and then I won't even complain about it!" was probably a flawed strategy. (I know, not her exact words, but that was the general vibe I got).

reply

$35,000 for 40 hours is $17.50 hourly. She is working well over 40 hours. Her paycheck equals that of an hourly worker making $11.20 an hour (factoring in mandatory time and a half after 40 hours).


That is very low for any retail management job. To run a pot shop that is horrendous. There is a very real legal risk. No job security. Does not exactly look good on a resume.

But that kind of a thing aside, there is an absolute ton of cash that goes through that place and its a heavily regulated industry of questionable legality. They should all be paying well and running a tight ship.

I agree that her reasoning for a raise was stupid, but they should be paying more.

reply

Only reason they were doing so well on main street was a grandfathered monopoly allowing them to briefly be there with no competition.


Didn't they initially have competition on main street but they all closed down but they survived then things went legal?

reply

There may have been MEDICAL marijuana allowed on main street. I think the BCC was medical marijuana before it was recreational marijuana allowed to open Jan 1 2014.

I don't remember if they had competition on main st. with medical marijuana or if it was all at Airport Rd?

Edited for spelling.

reply

I could have sworn they mentioned that there were other competing medical dispensaries in an earlier episode but I'm too lazy to track it down.

reply

I believe you are correct. I'm certain that Brian mentioned a time or two there were three medical dispensaries on Main Street at one time. I vaguely recall that Brian (and the owners/investors) made the a calculated business gamble to stay on Main Street in the belief that marijuana would be legalized for recreational use in the future. And that belief is why they put up with the high rent (for what was probably a year or two or three). Believing that if they could stick it out, they would reap the rewards when it was legalized.

That being said, it may have also been possible that the BCC had a business strategy whereby they garnered the bulk of the medical marijuana in downtown Breckenridge anyhow. So their competitors wouldn't have enough business to justify paying high rent on Main Street, and opted to relocate to a location where the rent justifies their sales.

reply

Don't like the pay, work somewhere else.
And that's what she did.

reply

I'm only on episode 3 but I'm in Denver so I'm hooked on the series and how it's playing out.

I don't think any of them came off looking good in that conversation. She framed the rationale for higher pay poorly. Brian came off brodouchy in justifying the current salary.

$35K a year is low considering how enormously expensive it is to live in Summit County. On that salary she's only renting a room in a house - and very likely not in Breck but a long commute away - which means high commute costs - gas and food in the high country is more expensive than Denver metro.

I do think given the all cash nature of the business, the legal risks and rules unique to the industry, and heightened risk of robbery, which Brian essentially refuses to acknowledge, combined with the high cost of living: a higher manager wage is warranted.

That being said - there is always the intersection of skills, market rate, and labor availability. Brian and Caitlin are right that other people would take the job for that rate. But they're also going to be essentially investing their time and money training the managers to eventually work for the competition if they can go elsewhere with the experience for more money.

What makes Brian a bit of a hypocrite is he says Breck is known for bad customer service and he wants to break that perception and be great in customer service. To do that: you hire, train and retain, and compensate accordingly, the people that will provide that level of service dependably under any circumstance. If you go for the low rate - you risk high turnover and never building a mature staff that provides that rock solid dependable level of service. So it's a business decision and what balance you really want between service, staff, and profits.


I was a little surprised at how fast B&C moved from "nice ambitious entrepreneurs" to a acting a bit douchy entitled as soon as the cash flow went positive. I would have focused on building a cushion and diversifying for some income from other sources (Caitlin mentions their credit is trashed from the startup costs). For as hard as they worked, and the plan they had, they seemed to get caught up way to quickly.

And then there's Gary Gallagher who moved to Breck in 2005 from Boulder (where he moved in 1996 he's a former NYC investment banker) and was all "our town" "our brand". I'm thinking "you rich jerks are what ruined the great local not terribly expensive place Breck (and Boulder) used to be in the 80's". 😎

reply

[deleted]

I thought it was crazy making a guy leave off a bench. This is America damn it!
Life is Good
:)

reply

grandfathered monopoly allowing them to briefly be there with no competition. It would be unfair to others if the town went back on the rules already established and gave these guys a permanent main street monopoly


"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

What hump? 

reply