MovieChat Forums > Finding Jesus: Faith. Fact. Forgery. (2015) Discussion > Archaeologists reveal there is ZERO evid...

Archaeologists reveal there is ZERO evidence the bible is real!


This confirms what you ALL know deep down inside! Archaeologists find NO evidence for ALL 4 main stories in the bible thereby destroying the foundation of this VERY false middle eastern religion! 


How Archaeology disproves the Bible: The Bible Unearthed 

If all this blather by religious fanatics like Bill O'Reilly regarding the supposed war Atheists are waging on Christmas got me thinking: Would these fundamentalist folks be so right-wing if they were aware of the relatively recent conclusions regarding the book they take so literally? 

A book offering a comprehensive overview of this subject and a mother lode of peer-reviewed research is still*The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts*by Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman. 

New findings point to completely different histories of Israel and Egypt than those in the Bible and thought to be true, including by Finkelstein himself: 

• Archaeological evidence contradicts all four stories that make up the foundations of the Bible; and 

• the Bible was written, re-written, edited and redacted for the purposes of propaganda. 

Early archaeologists in that part of the world were typically trained as clerics or theologians, the authors note, and so forced artifacts they found to match with Bible stories. That all changed once new excavations, chemical analysis of soil samples and refinements in the carbon-dating technique to determine age, revolutionized the study of these two of the most heavily excavated areas of the planet. 

Because many references to places and events in this period show contemporary details were integrated into stories biblical authors maintained happened hundreds or thousands of years before, the modern assessment that the foundations were laid during the late 8th and early 7th centuries BCE appears to be an open-and-shut-case. 

Why Was the Bible Created? 

To provide motivation and moral justification for the territorial aspirations of a little kingdom called Judah. 

Contrary to biblical history, Judah was a backward little region while its envied and despised neighbor to the north, Israel, was far more advantaged economically. Both, however, were usually under domination by one foreign power or another. * 

Finally, in the 8th century BCE, came Israel’s destruction and later the Assyrian retreat. That’s when King Josiah went to work. 

An ambitious plan to take advantage of the political vacuum required powerful propaganda, the authors note, and so one of the religions practiced in the area was chosen. That of the Israeli cult fit the bill. 

Archaeologists say at the same time the literacy rate rose, prompting “an unlikely coalition of Judahite court officials, scribes, priests, peasants and prophets” to create a new movement. By weaving in ancient heroic tales, legends and folklore, along with further reworking, elaboration and censoring, stories of the Old Testament were to “become a coherent and persuasive prophecy for the people of Israel.” 



The Patriarchs 

The first story molded with these goals in minds is that of the patriarchs in Genesis – starting with God’s favored family, that of Abraham, whose descendants would include Israel and Judah. 

Besides the fact the genealogies of the patriarchs, some of whom were said to have lived hundreds of years, are contradicted in various passages, the “combination of camels, Arabian goods and Philistines and place names, which were prevalent at the time of writing but nonexistent during the time period depicted in the Bible,” showed the story to be written centuries later. 

This story was crafted to provide Josiah’s subjects with a common ethnic and religious history, and ultimately fulfill the promises given to the patriarchs by God of a unified people living securely in their land. 

The belief that God had their backs would bring on Judah’s success. 

The Exodus 

The second foundational tale is that of the Exodus, where God chose Moses to liberate 600,000 men from enslavement in Egypt, and they proceeded to wander around the desert for 40 years. 

However, there was no record of any Israelites being in Egypt at that time, and hundreds of thousands of people trekking the desert would likely not have been allowed by Egypt, which tightly controlled the area. There are records of small bands passing through, yet none indicating a mass movement of people. There is also no evidence such a group camped for extended periods – including in the places mentioned in the Bible. 




http://m.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/24/1265119/-How-Archaeology-Disproves-Biblical-History 



Jesus NEVER existed! He is Judeo Christian MYTH!

reply

Shut up Satan.

reply

LOL..another Christian myth!

Jesus NEVER existed! He is Judeo Christian MYTH!

reply

Archaeology is all theory. Theories are constantly being discarded and replaced by new ones. Theory is just a guess.

I could be a morning person if morning happened at noon.

reply

Angel, Archaeology is a science, and a Scientific theory is based on careful examination of "facts". Which is different than a colloquial theory. Which is what you described. You should have learned the difference in your early years of education.

reply

Archaeology is a science that is based on theories formed of information that is known at a particular time. Those theories change based on new discoveries. It is never static, and we never know all that there is to know. You should have learned that in your early years of education.

I could be a morning person if morning happened at noon.

reply

Still, a scientific theory is not the same as a "guess". For a theory to warrant ongoing serious consideration, there must be data to support it. So far, no archaeological data support the theory that Jesus existed as a person, let alone as a deity who performed supernatural tricks, rose from the dead, and ascended to Heaven before witnesses. There are fringe "archaeologists" and even some real archaeologists whose integrity is clouded by their religious bias who claim otherwise, but they cannot be taken seriously.

reply

David Rohl an archeologist and agnostic, actuality has pretty strong evidence of Joseph and the exodus.

Also even atheists, agnostics, Jews, and pagans all agree and attest that Jesus did exist, was crucified, and His followers unlike other Jewish sects spread like no other.

reply

Atheists, agnostics, Jews, and pagans do not "all" agree that Jesus existed. There are no "strong" archaeological data of Joseph and the Exodus. As an archaeologist, I can prove that Mexican California of the 1820s existed, but that doesn't mean Zorro was real.

reply

Daily Kos! Only raving loonie Marxists read that.
Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman anti Semitic Jews.

reply