Anyone feel that both Stephen Amell and Grant Gustin's voice acting is a step below their normal acting? They didn't seem very comfortable with it and their acting seemed forced. It's kinda jarring when you watch them as live-action characters. Both Carlos Valdes and Emily Bett Rickards did a much better job. Although having less lines probably helped.
Save a horse, ride a cowboy!
Yup, especially Stephen Amell's. Grant's is weak until the end when it finally gets, shall we say, up to speed?
share Would be nice if they filmed a live action version of them doing the scenes again.
Save a horse, ride a cowboy!
Well I would doubt that they'll do the whole 30 minutes again. They might pull, say, 5 minutes or so and recreate it--probably two or three tiny bits from different parts of the 30 minutes and recreate them. Like we might see her getting the necklace from her foster father for two minutes, and then learning how to use it later for another three, or something like that--just enough so that if you haven't seen the animated version, you'll understand that she inherited the necklace and it gave her the power to take on the attributes of animals.
shareHopefully. Otherwise it would be weird if they did a flashback in cartoon. People who didn't see the webseries would be so confused as to why their memories were animated.
Save a horse, ride a cowboy!
The point isn't that they're not going to animated memories, but that they're not going to redo the whole 30 minutes of animation in live action. It's possible that they won't redo any of the animation in live action, and just treat the animation as backstory which audiences of the live-action show can view if they want.
share