Fairly disappointing


As a big fan of Adam's Power Of Nightmare's over 10 years ago, when I saw this had come out, and it's subject matter, I was very excited. However after watching two-thirds of it, it's very disappointing.

The subject is very interesting and makes for a great story. But this 2 hour documentary has been padded out with random clips that rarely have much to do with the story. The dialogue is scattered through-out with long periods of just clips. At times it feels like youtube the movie.

Adam is a good documentary writer, and PON showed this. But this documentary should be half the length, and have much more dialogue as to how the clips shown relate to the story being told.

There was so much more he could have built upon with relation to the Saudi-funded Wahhabist schools, and how they relate to conflicts that have sprung up worldwide. The story of the dam in Helmand is good, but he tells it at a sentence per every 10 mins, and it feels lost.

Like I said, just disappointing.

reply

Adam Curtis loves to use archive footage and he loves to create a story/picture from one moment in time that ultimately relates to another that might not have seemed connected, but actually it becomes apparent later that it is. I think that's what makes his documentaries interesting and thought provoking.

Even with power of nightmares, he makes some glaring errors and his complete denial of Al-Qaeda existing, is one. Now if he argued that they were used simply as the boogie men, fair enough, but he went as far as completely down playing them and making them almost none existing or not a threat at all, completely made up, which isn't true..

In this, Bitter Lake he's trying to explain how Wahhabism was allowed to flourish and in fact be encouraged for temporary gains or for private motives, instead of simply being educated away and that's why we have a islamist problem today. He uses Afghanistan as a reference point to where even the Americans indirectly ended up benefiting being part of the problem. Nor is the Russians free from any guilt, as with their harsh treatment of Afghanistan from the start just simply ended up making the Afghans go closer and relate to Wahhabism or more accurately allow Wahhabism to take advantage of that. For example, the Russians may have had sort of what they assumed was good intentions, but because in 80's nobody actually understood what the blow back would be actually far worst than if they did nothing.

I think each video has a meaning, just it may not seem directly relevant to the subject, but in fact there's two subjects playing out, Saudi Arabia / Wahhabism and then there's Afghanistan / Russia & US involvements.

reply

Even with power of nightmares, he makes some glaring errors and his complete denial of Al-Qaeda existing, is one.


Complete denial? It isn't the existence of al Qaeda he disputes, but its extent as an organisation (at the time and before), and its official history. Curtis isn't so nuts as to deny al Qaeda's existence.

reply