MovieChat Forums > Hot Girls Wanted (2015) Discussion > Were the filmmakers trying to portray th...

Were the filmmakers trying to portray the dark side of porn? They failed


If the filmmakers were attempting to be cautionary scolds, they could have found a much darker side to porn. None of the women in the film were dependent on drugs, they were living in a supportive collegiate household, the basic bro agent wasn't a creep, and even the family members/significant others depicted were about as understanding as you could reasonably expect. They even had puppies! The girls didn't care for the forced oral sex/ facial abuse scenes, but they didn't have to agree to them and could walk away anytime. They were chasing fame and attempting to escape small town despair. I just feel there are much worse stories to be told about the exploitation of women. Why not focus on international sex trade or something?

reply

I frankly don't get the assumption that the filmmakers were trying to portray the porn industry in a bad light. I think they let the people in the documentary speak their minds and showed things the way they are. More like reality television than an agenda being forced here.

If the message a young viewer takes away is that perhaps fame and money aren't worth the shame and blows to self esteem, then so be it. Others in the movie seem to have made some peace with their lifestyle choices, but it's up to we the viewers to decide if they are being honest and how long until they feel differently about things.

The documentary is as much about 21st Century American society and morality as it is about these particular girls and guys and their individual stories. Food for thought.

reply

More like reality television than an agenda being forced here.



I think so too. This was basically a reality show type doc. This wasn't meant to be some cautionary tale otherwise, we'd see some pretty dire circumstances for most of these girls throughout the doc but the worst thing we see is Tressa having to confess to her parents that she's doing porn. What we see instead is just a couple days in the life of amateur porn starlets and many of them have stayed i stayed in the industry and at least two of them are pretty popular, especially Brooklyn Daniels.

reply

Really? The music choices, the montages, the text they decided to put on the screen? You don't understand what the OP was getting at? Are you brain dead? Food for thought.

reply

I've seen several porn docs and they always seem to set up an agenda of "this industry manipulates people" but then they run out of steam to support that and just end up portraying the industry objectively anyhow and then the doc just ends up pointless. A summary of all porn docs....or maybe like three. :P


But it's so simple. This women sign contracts and are paid. "Here's money for sex." Where's the manipulation?

Porch Monkey 4 Life.

reply

I agree. I work in this industry (I'm a camgirl) and i was so mad and annoyed at how puritanical and moralising this was trying to be. And they basically tried everything to make that girl feel bad when she was pretty happy with her own choice. Porn is not the *beep* devil. There are so many amazing people in this industry and the vast majority of women i know LOVE their jobs, are their own boss and therefore take *beep* from exactly no one. If this film was trying to be feminist it miserably failed...

If anyone wants to see another sort of outlook on this industry you should check out Sean Dunne's "camgirlz" (it's more specifically about what i do, but still interesting if you're interested in the subject.)

reply

It seems pretty objective to me. I didn't see them trying to make anything look one way or the other. Why so defensive?

reply

This documentary reminded me a little of that reality show I used to watch in the 1990s called "The Real World" they just added the ups and downs of porn.. was interesting though..

reply

You can't have it both ways. Good documentaries are not objective: they present a point and back it up. Non-committal ones are unconvincing and, thus, boring and useless. Which was this?

reply

I don't think they were, I think it was neutral. I think they were more investigating the phenomenon of these professional amateurs rather than making a specific statement - they could have edited it very differently if that's what they'd wanted. As it was it showed different attitudes and good and bad things so that's it.

I do think the Texas girl (I can't even remember all their names) got VERY lucky with her parents and bf....she is one lucky girl. If anything that was probably unusually positive.

I would have liked to have seen more of the men involved. And what they think about their job. The agent seemed like a loser but not terribly creepy or weird or anything. They briefly showed two male porn actors, both of whom seemed hilariously normal in their little snippets, chatting or whatever - I know they knew they were being filmed, but even so, they didn't seem lecherous or anything. All very strange.

reply

Agreed. This doco wasn't trying to shame anyone, it just showed things for what they are. That's the best kind of documentary making.

reply

It was though...

reply