These amatuer porn girls, seems not bought up propety. Are they mostly from lower class (working class), or lower middle class? It seems to me any typical middle class family would not have these kind of girls. So the majority of them should be in lower class or lower middle class?
shareThey're mostly middle class or lower. Girls with rich parents don't need to be abused for money.
shareIt's probably safe to assume that they did not have scholarships lined up to go to university in the fall.
shareI'm guessing middle class and lower class girls who are obsessed with sex or the ones who are in desperate need for $$$. But one thing is certain in most cases, they aren't brought up properly. Teens with low self esteem do things that are beyond reckless when they're off their leash.
http://i.imgur.com/Zqh7md9.webm
So "rich" = Good, healthy, and proper. You believe exactly what the rich want you to believe.
shareMost of them are white and from decent backgrounds.
Yeah most of these girls are going to be lower class, or at least lower middle class.
I know lawrence fishburne's daughter did some porn but I assumed she had a drug habit. Most women from the upper class would have the time and money to look attractive and would just marry a well do to man if she's not going to get a career of her own so wouldn't need to whore herself out so she is a rare case.
Sex is a way most women can make money, which isn't the same with guys unless he's gay or willing to do gay for pay. Sorry but most women don't need to pay for sex. Even fat chicks can get laid by someone. She he may not be attractive and would be a horrible husband but fat girls can get some dick from desperate men who can't score a woman with self worth.